Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/11/2019 12:03:29 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson Top Graded #Vikings on offense yesterday via @PFF - Adam Thielen 85.0 - CJ Ham 78.4 - Chad Beebe 73.2 Lowest Graded #Vikings on offense yesterday - Garrett Bradbury 35.1 - Ameer Abdullah 48.5 - Pat Elflein 58.1 (Matt Anderson on Twitter) I saw some film breakdown on Bradbury and he was instrumental in several of our best plays. Do people actually care about what PFF has to say? I heard, don't know how true it is, That Chris Collinsworth is part owner or a high level executive for PFF. That's was all I needed to know. No useful information there at all. Why does it have to be that PFF is either the bible or 'no useful information at all'? On a scale of 1-100 with 1 being no useful information at all and 100 being rock solid nailed it I'd say PFF sits at about a 65-70. It's better for certain positions and worse for others. The majority of their guesswork comes in trying to determine what the players' assignments were on any particular play. Easy for WR, RB, TE, DE, S, CB, and to some extent - QB. Very hard for T, G, C, DT, and to some extent - LB. My favorites are the people that quote PFF when the results are positive and crucify them when they're negative. They're far from the "be-all-end-all", but they're a useful supplemental piece of information. I'm not sure they are any more useful than any individual fan's voice ... but if nothing else, they are a non-viking entity. So referring to them at least feels like you are adding some arbitrary weight to your argument. However zany they can be at times.
|
|
|
|