Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (11/30/2020 12:40:47 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson The Vikings rank 26th in the NFL in points allowed. With that in mind, yes, I am pleased with 5-6. They are winning games in spite of the defense. If you don't get it, have a look at the 2014, 2015 and 2016 Saints. They finished 7-9 in each of those years -- because of defense. In the same timeframe (since 2018 when Cousins came to the Vikings), these QBs have won one or zero playoff games: Russell Wilson Aaron Rodgers Ben Roethlisberger Dak Prescott Deshaun Watson Drew Brees Lamar Jackson Three QBs have won a Super Bowl during the last decade on their rookie deals -- Flacco, Wilson, Mahomes. That means eight championships were won by QBs NOT on rookie deals. Why do we act like this "QB on his rookie deal" strategy is bulletproof? It doesn't usually work. With the Rams losing to the 49ers and presumably angry about it, I fully expect them to defeat the Cardinals next weekend. In that scenario, coupled with a win over JAX, the Vikings would be the #7 seed by this time next week. And then on to Tampa. (Dustin Baker on Twitter) This guy's special skill is crafting stats and numbers to try and skew people's perception of facts. I'll restate the same thing he said in equally true terms but will say something else: In the last decade, in order to win the Super Bowl you needed a Manning or a Brady. If you didn't have a Manning or a Brady then you needed needed a QB on his rookie deal as they won 60% of the Super Bowls in the last decade that weren't won by a Manning or a Brady. Aaron Rodgers and Nick Foles won the other two. So, in summary, A Manning or a Brady won 50%, QBs on rookie deals won 30%, and Rodgers/Foles picked up the other 20%. Lastly, no one has stated that 'QB on his rookie deal strategy is bulletproof'. Great job. Screw that Dustin Twitter tweeter. His crap get imported here by those trying to make a point and it gets beat down!
|
|
|
|