Todd M -> RE:Mike Vick case (8/19/2007 12:46:33 PM)
|
[quote="Easy E"][quote="Todd Mallett"]I don't agree with your reasoning Pete. Vick took puppies and treated them like crap for a couple of years. Tested the dogs out to see if they could fight or not. If they couldn’t, he took the dog and tried to hang it. If the hanging failed he took the dog and drowned it. If they could fight he pitted them against other dogs and enjoyed watching them rip each other apart. Wishing for a man of this character to face some jail house justice does not put you on the same level as that man, let alone below it. It's not necessarily the healthiest way to go about things in society, but I will not feel sorry for the man one bit if he faces some stiff penalties in jail as it seems the actual penalties aren't going to be harsh enough. I swear I'll go ballistic if Tim Donaghy gets more jail time than Vick. Now if Steven was wishing for this ref to face the same jail house justice you might be on to something.[/quote] Then you probably should go ballistic every day because there are people who rape, murder and maim human beings and get away with it. IMO, THAT'S a more appropriate target for this bile and anger. Only 1 out of the 3 things you listed Vick didn't do to dogs. Everyone always wants to move away what Vick did from what is done to humans. IMO cruelty is cruelty. I love animals, and I don't condone dog fighting. I also don't condone people who purposely run over animals, kill rare game, or the slaughtering of thousands of animals for unnecessary testing, but that stuff goes on every day. I mean people still enjoy veal without thinking about what it actually takes to get it. Have you ever been to a slaughterhouse? The tens of thousands of cattle, hogs, sheep, etc that go through there every single day are terrified much more than the dogs Vick killed. People still love to see bullfights, and unless a horse is incredible, if it goes lame it gets shot. I don't condone raping/murdering/molesting/torturing humans myself. I wouldn't use one or the other as an example of where some ones priorities should be. Shit happens all over the world every day. You use the slaughterhouse analogy. How the hell am I supposed to feel enraged for every animal that goes through there? I've tried on several occasions to move away from meat because I dislike how animals are grown and slaughtered just for food but haven't been successful yet. In this case, it is what it is, accepted across society for the most part. Not a battle that I choose to fight. As for Bullfighting and the putting down of a lame race horse. Obviously I hate both. But we are not posting in the horse race/bull fighting/animal abuse thread. I don't see why I have to feel bad about following this sensationalized case. It hits close to home for me. I may not be doing anything about animal cruelty at the present time but it's where my passion is. I will have that farm someday and I will take in hard luck animal cases. None of this is me saying that Vick should get a free pass. But he's getting more bile than arsonists, murderers and rapists. We as a country have condoned the slaughter of hundred of thousands of innocent people, many of them babies, simply because we wanted to get Saddam Hussein and they unfortunately got in the way. I understand where you’re at. Open up dialogue on these other things. It's not like I don't care. I'm not going to apologize for my interest in how this case plays out though. I have no doubt there are people that actually DO hope Vick goes to prison and gets gang raped. I just think people get their priorities messed up sometimes, IMO. I'll admit it. I can live with Vick serving some jail house justice. When it crosses a certain line with me I don't have sympathy in my heart for any 1 person who kills or abuses the innocent. Animals OR people. [/quote]
|
|
|
|