|
twinsfan -> RE: Vikes talk for Twins Fans (9/6/2016 3:59:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: McMurfy
quote:
ORIGINAL: TJSweens
quote:
ORIGINAL: twinsfan
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed
quote:
ORIGINAL: twinsfan
Barreiro on my side. Not sure I like that.
What exactly IS your side?? [:D]
Not liking the Bradford trade.
I guess it gives depth, in that you now have 2 mediocre NFL quarterbacks.
If you think Hill can't hold up, I'd prefer you get a guy that's not going to cost you as many draft picks. I'd trade a #4 for someone's backup. Maybe that trade wasn't out there.
Barreiro says that if Bradford wasn't the first overall pick, there would be no sizzle associated with this trade. I tend to agree. If he was a 5th rounder that has put up these bleh numbers and injury-riddled seasons, nobody would advocate giving up a 1st rounder for him, late first rounder (still to be determined IMO) or not.
I would think that if Bradford was going to be a bonafide GOOD NFL quarterback, it would have happened by now.
Suffice it to say, you, Barreiro and Common are all wrong.
And those guys are trying to generate interest in their programs, deep down they like the move, to generate interest in the show, they take the contarian role.
You?
You're just wrong
My first instinct was "they traded a 1st and 4th rounder for a QB that is a bust?" Now, if I was Texas or Oklahoma State in 2009, I make this trade. Great college QB.
|
|
|
|