quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Ricky, I wonder if Diggs had scored on that play, and then the officials noticed the 12th man, where would the ball have been spotted, or would an unsportsmanlike call have negated the INT ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I saw the Twitter still photo that showed Seattle having 10 players, but I think there may have been a safety deeper that wasn't in that photo. I ran the video and counted 11 players, but it was a challenge with all the players moving.

Was just curious how they might rule that. One person on Twitter said the INT wouldn't count, that the play wouldn't count as the player coming on the field like that would be ruled an unsportsmanlike conduct, or something like that, negating the play.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Interesting Ricky. So that would be some sort of interpretation judgement call ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Interesting Ricky. So that would be some sort of interpretation judgement call ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Pretty sure there were 11 there bigO. At 2 seconds pause, and you see 8 guys, the guys rushing, and the guys in the middle. At 4 seconds, you see 3 in coverage, for a total of 11.

The safety only needed to be 15 yards back to not be in the picture at the start of the video. It shows 10, but it only goes 10 yards past the line of scrimmage

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Interesting Ricky. So that would be some sort of interpretation judgement call ?

I would say the rule for the spot of enforcement would be the same as say on a KO return, for a block in the back, the spot of enforcement is where the kick returner is as the block in the back occurs. I don't believe the spot of enforcement as the spot of the foul would apply, because what if the spot of the foul is 20 yards ahead of the returner?

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KG, have you seen Watson play ?

The one game fluke, turned into a 2 game fluke, and now a 3 game fluke.

Watson is big and very fast, a stud in the making, unless he doesn't stay healthy. I wish the Vikings would have drafted him, and paired him with JJ for the next 5 years.

He had a TD and over 100 yards against the Eagles. So that is 6 TDs in 3 games.

Kid is looking like an absolute stud so far.

12 receptions, 265 yards, 22 YPC, 6 TDs in the past 3 games.

6'5, 200 lbs, 4.36 40, 38.5 Vertical.

Supposedly a good kid and teammate as well. And he's still quite raw with a lot more upside.

I'd be thrilled to have him as the heir apparent to Thielen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KG, have you seen Watson play ?

The one game fluke, turned into a 2 game fluke, and now a 3 game fluke.

Watson is big and very fast, a stud in the making, unless he doesn't stay healthy. I wish the Vikings would have drafted him, and paired him with JJ for the next 5 years.

He had a TD and over 100 yards against the Eagles. So that is 6 TDs in 3 games.

Kid is looking like an absolute stud so far.

12 receptions, 265 yards, 22 YPC, 6 TDs in the past 3 games.

6'5, 200 lbs, 4.36 40, 38.5 Vertical.

Supposedly a good kid and teammate as well. And he's still quite raw with a lot more upside.

I'd be thrilled to have him as the heir apparent to Thielen.

He has Megatron type measurables. If he can stay healthy and continue to learn route running and improving his hands he will be a stud.

If Jameson Williams is as advertised, Kwesi handed a stud wr to two div foes while drafting bums with the acquired draft capital. Not a good look.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

It's possible that Detroit feeling like they fleeced Kwesi on draft day, setup Kwesi fleecing them with Hock.

Hopefully Green Bay feels the same way with Watson, then Kwesi can trade up with GB on draft day to get the Vikings a young, franchise QB.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Since Lance can't seem to solidify the QB spot for SF, and many think Garrapolo is average, is it possible Purdy is actually the best of the 3, and he just needs experience ?