David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (11/19/2019 9:40:39 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson quote:
ORIGINAL: Ragnarök quote:
ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager Ragnarok called it; gave Stefanski credit for the second half. Which was spot on. I'm glad Stefanski is a creative guy! Let him run the offense how he sees fit! Denver knew what we were, a running team leaning on Cook, as well they knew the schemes and ideology of Kubiak... We came out with Zimmer having tablet in hand, sticking his nose into offensive playcalling and working hard off an sheet prepared with Zim and Kub philosophy... It was evident, as evident as how we started the season and self proclaimed "that 70s's Offense" our HC is sure will win games while coupled with his vaunted D... Well guess what... BOTH FAILED Step pulled out a whiteboard and a breath of fresh air overtook the offense with what a entire first half could not do... We were countering their punches, using fresh new schemes and calling plays that the D didnt see coming... It won the game, along with Kirk and our offense executing. Why? because even us as fans could call the plays that would be run next in first half... second half was different... Will we see more of this? With our HC, doubt it... And the HC's D remains truly troubling BTW! Denver had 2 weeks to prepare and Fangio has ate our lunch the last couple years. The whole coaching staff made adjustments at halftime and we outscored them 27-3. If you want to believe that Stephanski was making up plays, go for it. The Rudy TD was a play we have run many times. Dalvin screen many times before. The RPO(or really good play action) where we went deep to Diggs might have been drawn up on the fly.
|
|
|
|