RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message


Bruce Johnson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:30:16 PM)

Just because Riley Reiff is accepting the paycut, doesn't mean he's going to be happy about it. He's pro's pro. But that will be a situation to watch.

John Krawczynski on Twitter




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:34:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I wonder why Reiff is still on the team. Maybe we were just trying to trick him into a pay cut and he called our bluff.

I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.


With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:37:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I wonder why Reiff is still on the team. Maybe we were just trying to trick him into a pay cut and he called our bluff.

I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.


With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.

And he sucks.




Bruce Johnson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:39:38 PM)

Players agree to contracts where they get only so much guaranteed. After that, the team can cut them. If Reiff felt he could have earned more elsewhere, he could have told the Vikings no and become a free agent. He took less money because he determined it was best for him.

Scott Korzenowski on Twitter




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:39:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Just because Riley Reiff is accepting the paycut, doesn't mean he's going to be happy about it. He's pro's pro. But that will be a situation to watch.

John Krawczynski on Twitter


If he wants to pout, he can sit on the bench and watch his next contract dwindle.

But I've never heard anything but Reiff being a consummate professional. I expect him to play up to his (limited) abilities.




Bruce Johnson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:42:47 PM)

Seven #Vikings players make ESPN's 2020 Top 100 (including newly-acquired Yannick Ngakoue coming in at #68) — tied with the Chiefs and Saints for most in the NFL

Nick Olson on Twitter




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:52:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I wonder why Reiff is still on the team. Maybe we were just trying to trick him into a pay cut and he called our bluff.

I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.


With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.

And he sucks.


I think he is slightly above average....13th-15th best OT (when healthy)....what should that pay?




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:55:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Seven #Vikings players make ESPN's 2020 Top 100 (including newly-acquired Yannick Ngakoue coming in at #68) — tied with the Chiefs and Saints for most in the NFL

Nick Olson on Twitter

41. Dalvin Cook

55. Danielle Hunter

62. Harrison Smith

68. Yannick Ngakoue

80. Adam Thielen

82. Kirk Cousins [:-]

96. Eric Kendricks




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 1:55:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I wonder why Reiff is still on the team. Maybe we were just trying to trick him into a pay cut and he called our bluff.

I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.


With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.

And he sucks.


I think he is slightly above average....13th-15th best OT (when healthy)....what should that pay?

I think you are overly generous in your assessment of Reiff.




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:01:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

I wonder why Reiff is still on the team. Maybe we were just trying to trick him into a pay cut and he called our bluff.

I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.


With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.

And he sucks.


I think he is slightly above average....13th-15th best OT (when healthy)....what should that pay?

I think you are overly generous in your assessment of Reiff.


I do mean LT....not all (Left and Right) tackles.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:17:08 PM)

Joe Mixon just got a 4/48 extension with the Bengals.

Probably a decent comp to Cook (other than games played).

Cook: 3 years, 29 games, 457/2104/17, 4.6 Y/A. 104/914/2, 8.8 Y/R
Mixon: 3 years, 44 games, 693/2931/17, 4.2 Y/A. 108/870/4, 8.1 Y/R




ronhextall -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:19:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

Joe Mixon just got a 4/48 extension with the Bengals.

Probably a decent comp to Cook (other than games played).

Cook: 3 years, 29 games, 457/2104/17, 4.6 Y/A. 104/914/2, 8.8 Y/R
Mixon: 3 years, 44 games, 693/2931/17, 4.2 Y/A. 108/870/4, 8.1 Y/R



29 games vs 44 games in equal number of seasons.

ouch




Guest -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:21:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

The highlights of the offense I’ve seen with O’Neill at LT only show Rashod Hill at RT.

Add in Dozier, and Elflein at Guards takes quite a bit of sheen off the acquisition of Ngakoue for me.

Hope I’m wrong, but even at the heights of Zimmer’s defenses in Minnesota we eventually were taken down by the collapse of our OLine in the playoffs.

Was hoping at least ONE of our young OLineman would emerge, and that we could acquire another solid veteran to complete a rebuild on the fly.

Not seeing it.



Dozier and Elf would have been at guard regardless of Yannick's acquisition. We had 12M in cap before the move and not a whisper of trying out guards or signing a vet. Massively disappointing that Samia hasn't seemed to take a step forward and Udoh not given play at G.

The real question: is the drop off from Reiff (if there is one) and the overall T play worth Yannick? T might be our deepest position. Our D line had real question marks. Ifeadi was productive inside and now we've got three strong edge rushers.



Perhaps worded poorly,

Going after a stud like Ngakoue when we put so little towards an obvious hole in our roster is disappointing to me.

Yes we filled a hole on the DLine for sure. Need the D-tackles to step up, but I feel good with our overall defense as it stands.




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:24:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H
I think you are seeing a bit of this going on right now. With COVID and the potential for the season to be canceled, it would seem that players have lost a bit of leverage. I.e...Leonard Fornette.

With or w/o Covid Reiff didn't have leverage....he was overpaid.

And he sucks.

I think he is slightly above average....13th-15th best OT (when healthy)....what should that pay?

I think you are overly generous in your assessment of Reiff.

I do mean LT....not all (Left and Right) tackles.

I know what you meant and I still think you are overly generous.




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:25:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

The highlights of the offense I’ve seen with O’Neill at LT only show Rashod Hill at RT.

Add in Dozier, and Elflein at Guards takes quite a bit of sheen off the acquisition of Ngakoue for me.

Hope I’m wrong, but even at the heights of Zimmer’s defenses in Minnesota we eventually were taken down by the collapse of our OLine in the playoffs.

Was hoping at least ONE of our young OLineman would emerge, and that we could acquire another solid veteran to complete a rebuild on the fly.

Not seeing it.



Dozier and Elf would have been at guard regardless of Yannick's acquisition. We had 12M in cap before the move and not a whisper of trying out guards or signing a vet. Massively disappointing that Samia hasn't seemed to take a step forward and Udoh not given play at G.

The real question: is the drop off from Reiff (if there is one) and the overall T play worth Yannick? T might be our deepest position. Our D line had real question marks. Ifeadi was productive inside and now we've got three strong edge rushers.


Perhaps worded poorly,
Going after a stud like Ngakoue when we put so little towards an obvious hole in our roster is disappointing to me.
Yes we filled a hole on the DLine for sure. Need the D-tackles to step up, but I feel good with our overall defense as it stands.


Depending on the number I might be more disappointed with restructure of Reiff than a cut....I think there will be an OG out there that could help. Gives us a little more time to get Cleveland/Udoh acclimated somewhere....




Guest -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:33:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

The highlights of the offense I’ve seen with O’Neill at LT only show Rashod Hill at RT.

Add in Dozier, and Elflein at Guards takes quite a bit of sheen off the acquisition of Ngakoue for me.

Hope I’m wrong, but even at the heights of Zimmer’s defenses in Minnesota we eventually were taken down by the collapse of our OLine in the playoffs.

Was hoping at least ONE of our young OLineman would emerge, and that we could acquire another solid veteran to complete a rebuild on the fly.

Not seeing it.



Dozier and Elf would have been at guard regardless of Yannick's acquisition. We had 12M in cap before the move and not a whisper of trying out guards or signing a vet. Massively disappointing that Samia hasn't seemed to take a step forward and Udoh not given play at G.

The real question: is the drop off from Reiff (if there is one) and the overall T play worth Yannick? T might be our deepest position. Our D line had real question marks. Ifeadi was productive inside and now we've got three strong edge rushers.


Perhaps worded poorly,
Going after a stud like Ngakoue when we put so little towards an obvious hole in our roster is disappointing to me.
Yes we filled a hole on the DLine for sure. Need the D-tackles to step up, but I feel good with our overall defense as it stands.


Depending on the number I might be more disappointed with restructure of Reiff than a cut....I think there will be an OG out there that could help. Gives us a little more time to get Cleveland/Udoh acclimated somewhere....



Agreed.

$4mil a possibility?

No idea.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:38:20 PM)

Ben Goessling@GoesslingStrib
Even with his deal done, Riley Reiff isn’t practicing today. Danielle Hunter walked off with strength and conditioning coach Mark Uyeyama after being on the field for warmups. Still no practice for the DE.

Eric Smith@Eric_L_Smith
Riley Reiff not spotted at start of #Vikings practice today. Also no Kenny Willekes.

Danielle Hunter not in pads but present, and went through stretches for 2nd straight day.




Bruce Johnson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:47:55 PM)

Mixon: 2,931 yards 4.3 yards per carry 66 yards per game 21 TD's 44 games

Cook: 2,104 yards 4.6 yards per carry 72 yards per game 19 TD's 29 games

The thing that stands out to me are the number of games that Cook has missed. Otherwise he seems to be just slightly more productive. Not a lot, though.

Edit: Sorry. I'm repeating comments again.




The Happy Norseman -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:50:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

The highlights of the offense I’ve seen with O’Neill at LT only show Rashod Hill at RT.

Add in Dozier, and Elflein at Guards takes quite a bit of sheen off the acquisition of Ngakoue for me.

Hope I’m wrong, but even at the heights of Zimmer’s defenses in Minnesota we eventually were taken down by the collapse of our OLine in the playoffs.

Was hoping at least ONE of our young OLineman would emerge, and that we could acquire another solid veteran to complete a rebuild on the fly.

Not seeing it.



Dozier and Elf would have been at guard regardless of Yannick's acquisition. We had 12M in cap before the move and not a whisper of trying out guards or signing a vet. Massively disappointing that Samia hasn't seemed to take a step forward and Udoh not given play at G.

The real question: is the drop off from Reiff (if there is one) and the overall T play worth Yannick? T might be our deepest position. Our D line had real question marks. Ifeadi was productive inside and now we've got three strong edge rushers.


Perhaps worded poorly,
Going after a stud like Ngakoue when we put so little towards an obvious hole in our roster is disappointing to me.
Yes we filled a hole on the DLine for sure. Need the D-tackles to step up, but I feel good with our overall defense as it stands.


Depending on the number I might be more disappointed with restructure of Reiff than a cut....I think there will be an OG out there that could help. Gives us a little more time to get Cleveland/Udoh acclimated somewhere....


The only downside is that we aren't going to find out if O'Neill can be as good at LT as he is at RT, and if Udoh can be a stud at RT. Going into GB starting 4 players at different positions than they played last year, or in the case of Udoh barely played at all, and a Center who underperformed could have been grim. At least we're starting the season with the 5 olineman who have been working together in training camp.




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 2:56:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: The Happy Norseman

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

The highlights of the offense I’ve seen with O’Neill at LT only show Rashod Hill at RT.

Add in Dozier, and Elflein at Guards takes quite a bit of sheen off the acquisition of Ngakoue for me.

Hope I’m wrong, but even at the heights of Zimmer’s defenses in Minnesota we eventually were taken down by the collapse of our OLine in the playoffs.

Was hoping at least ONE of our young OLineman would emerge, and that we could acquire another solid veteran to complete a rebuild on the fly.

Not seeing it.



Dozier and Elf would have been at guard regardless of Yannick's acquisition. We had 12M in cap before the move and not a whisper of trying out guards or signing a vet. Massively disappointing that Samia hasn't seemed to take a step forward and Udoh not given play at G.

The real question: is the drop off from Reiff (if there is one) and the overall T play worth Yannick? T might be our deepest position. Our D line had real question marks. Ifeadi was productive inside and now we've got three strong edge rushers.


Perhaps worded poorly,
Going after a stud like Ngakoue when we put so little towards an obvious hole in our roster is disappointing to me.
Yes we filled a hole on the DLine for sure. Need the D-tackles to step up, but I feel good with our overall defense as it stands.


Depending on the number I might be more disappointed with restructure of Reiff than a cut....I think there will be an OG out there that could help. Gives us a little more time to get Cleveland/Udoh acclimated somewhere....


The only downside is that we aren't going to find out if O'Neill can be as good at LT as he is at RT, and if Udoh can be a stud at RT. Going into GB starting 4 players at different positions than they played last year, or in the case of Udoh barely played at all, and a Center who underperformed could have been grim. At least we're starting the season with the 5 olineman who have been working together in training camp.


What if O'Neil isn't as good at LT and you cut Reiff. We have time and depth at Tackle to figure this out long haul.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 3:00:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Mixon: 2,931 yards 4.3 yards per carry 66 yards per game 21 TD's 44 games

Cook: 2,104 yards 4.6 yards per carry 72 yards per game 19 TD's 29 games

The thing that stands out to me are the number of games that Cook has missed. Otherwise he seems to be just slightly more productive. Not a lot, though.

Edit: Sorry. I'm repeating comments again.


I wouldn't have given Mixon that much money either.

But I don't like paying RBs. Most of them fall off the cliff at some point - and generally much earlier than other positions. Look at guys like David Johnson or Fornette who both looked like the "next big thing" in recent years.




Bruce Johnson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 3:06:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Mixon: 2,931 yards 4.3 yards per carry 66 yards per game 21 TD's 44 games

Cook: 2,104 yards 4.6 yards per carry 72 yards per game 19 TD's 29 games

The thing that stands out to me are the number of games that Cook has missed. Otherwise he seems to be just slightly more productive. Not a lot, though.

Edit: Sorry. I'm repeating comments again.


I wouldn't have given Mixon that much money either.

But I don't like paying RBs. Most of them fall off the cliff at some point - and generally much earlier than other positions. Look at guys like David Johnson or Fornette who both looked like the "next big thing" in recent years.


I agree. I was initially supportive of Adrian Peterson getting big bucks, but then I backed off from even him getting the big pay day. He was indeed worth the money for much of his career, but certainly not maybe the last four years with the Vikings.

Edit: I just double checked. Of his last three years as a Viking two of them he had less than 100 yards for the season. He did have one good season in between.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 3:06:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Just because Riley Reiff is accepting the paycut, doesn't mean he's going to be happy about it. He's pro's pro. But that will be a situation to watch.

John Krawczynski on Twitter



If he is a "pro's pro" there shouldn't be any situation to watch.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 3:10:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

Mixon: 2,931 yards 4.3 yards per carry 66 yards per game 21 TD's 44 games

Cook: 2,104 yards 4.6 yards per carry 72 yards per game 19 TD's 29 games

The thing that stands out to me are the number of games that Cook has missed. Otherwise he seems to be just slightly more productive. Not a lot, though.

Edit: Sorry. I'm repeating comments again.


I wouldn't have given Mixon that much money either.

But I don't like paying RBs. Most of them fall off the cliff at some point - and generally much earlier than other positions. Look at guys like David Johnson or Fornette who both looked like the "next big thing" in recent years.


I agree. I was initially supportive of Adrian Peterson getting big bucks, but then I backed off from even him getting the big pay day. He was indeed worth the money for much of his career, but certainly not maybe the last four years with the Vikings.


And AD's longevity is definitely the exception, not the rule.




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/1/2020 3:11:23 PM)

.
.
i think it's just too late in the summer to try to fit a new guy into reiff's slot...if they made the o'neill to lt commitment in a normal offseason and he starting preparing in may we'd probably be okay with the line shuffle, but not in early september....




Page: <<   < prev  156 157 [158] 159 160   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode