ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/30/2020 3:53:08 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager There are simply too many options to keep Reiff at tackle or even on the team. Even if Ezra is not ready at the start of the season, Hill is better on the left side and could start the season, transitioning like we did with ONeil. If Udoh is ready, we can move Oneil to the left side and insert Udoh. We've been cap strapped for two years. A stagnant cap (or worse) and Cousins cap hit rising the next few years, we will need the 23M. I'm more than ok with the Tackles learning on the job. Reiff is not irreplaceable. Is average at best, and there is a risk of decline. You might be right, but the cap relief from cutting Reiff is very modest. I heard it speculated that he could be pressured to take a pay cut before the season begins, especially if he will not be a starter. I'm also thinking that he might be a better guard than LT, but I again I am just speculating. It's all up in the air. I'm not a fan personally of making wholesale changes along the offensive line especially with a limited of-season. But it's not my call. Zimmer doesn't ask for my opinion. I don't consider 23M modest. I consider it substantial. Didn't you post that the cap could be cut 40M next year (because of COVID)? With Reiff gone, we'd be under even a reduced cap and in a great position to sign some very talented player(s). A team like NO would have to cut some studs. I think Reiff at guard would be an abject failure like Remmers - I have zero confidence in that move. ONeil/Collins/Hill have been in the same system for several years, Bradbury/Samia/Udoh - this would be their second year. Only player that this would be their first is Ezra, and we have options in case he's not ready. There's no rush to cut Reiff, we can wait until the first game of the season (I think) before his contract becomes guaranteed. Be interesting to see it play out. this conversation started because there's talk that the Vikes are negotiating a trade; reiff for desmond king (CB) chargers...that's why reiff disappears - we would still have a cap savings of $6-9m this season, depending on post-June trade rules which i know nothing about.... A post June trade would net the same cap savings as Reiff being cut (22.8M). If we can trade Reiff for anything, I'm for it. If Reiff is ok with a pay cut and a mutual opt out like Griff was - I'm ok with it. I don't know that he's going to take a 5M cut to play guard (which would put him inline with Kline - even though Kline was proven at guard and Reiff is not). KG - the link I provided shows the cap difference in all the different situations. Unless Overthecap is wrong, a post june cut would net 23M in savings. Options ranked in my preferred order: Trade, Outright Cut, Paycut. do we really want reiff playing guard?...tackles don't have the lower body strength that guards have and if reiff has not been training for that all offseason he won't be ready - and he might not be ready anyway.... massively powerful: quadriceps--hamstrings--glutes the chargers probably want a reiff and a draft pick, and we know that spielman is very attached to his picks....
|
|
|
|