| 
	   
	    | 
		    
			  | thebigo ->  RE: General Vikes Talk  (1/1/2024 6:32:41 PM) |  
			  | 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  ratoppenheimer
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  Bill Johanesen
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  ratoppenheimer
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  Tom Sykes
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  bstinger
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  Tom Sykes
 
 
 quote:
 ORIGINAL:  Bill Johanesen
 
 Have always wondered if they chose Addison (or targeted a WR) in the 1st round as a hedge against JJ leaving via trade due to cap concerns or potentially just wanting out.  At the time, Thielen had been released and Osborn was/is merely an ok #3 WR approaching free agency.  QB could have been an option or need but there wasn't much to choose from.
 
 This is the year to get a QB.  But absent a costly trade up, how far down the QB list are they willing to go considering they likely are not sold on every one of, say, the top 6-8 QBs?
 
 It seems to me like they have passed the point of being finicky choosy to get QB lucky. Like me picking lotto numbers based on the final ages of my six dead dogs since childhood. Sure, makes perfect sense … does it get me any closer to winning?
 
 Time to adjust the spray nozzle to maximum wad size and let it rip.
 
 Make the QB draft picks rain.
 
 Disagree.  Don't force picks out of desperation.  Pick a guy you really want.  If you have to overpay to move up and get that guy, go for it.  But don't draft a dud just for the sake of making a pick.
 
 I’m exaggerating. So are you … we are desperate to begin with, not forcing anything.
 
 Nobody is going to take a guy they dont like, nobody drafts a dud intentionally.
 
 When the talent is clear cut, dont reach for need. Clearly.
 
 All things equal, with multiple options of similar talent, need absolutely matters.
 
 My thing is … we are not only desperate but we suck at drafting. We need to invest resources. That’s all I ask.
 
 
 there have been 13 trades for the 1st overall pick since 1967, and it looks like no team has ever paid even three 1st rounders for the first overall - they have paid as many as two 1st and several 2nds though....
 
 the most recent....
 
 Bears had the 1st overall - Panthers 2023
 Bears received
 DJ Moore
 1st on draft year #9
 2nd on draft year #61
 1st next year
 2nd two years later
 
 
 Titans had the 1st overall - Rams 2016
 Titans received
 1st on draft year #15
 2nd on draft year
 2nd on draft year
 3rd on draft year
 1st next year
 3rd next year
 
 
 I would gladly pay three 1st, or even more with trade-back picks - all for the #1 quarterback on our list....
 
 i think that one of the keys is not to get financially bogged down on a veteran quarterback this year, i.e., cousins or whoever...we'll have some money for free agents, and with some nifty draft picking we could be reloaded and ready to go in 2025....
 
 
 Beyond the #1 overall:
 
 The Redskins gave up 3 first rounders and a second rounder for the #2 overall (RG III).
 
 The 49ers gave up 3 first rounders and a third rounder for the #3 overall (Trey Lance).
 
 
 
 yes, thank you for that...three 1sts and a 2nd - I would pay that and more to draft the 2024 quarterback we covet - quarterback is just so important in today's NFL that it's pointless to spend large amounts of money on other positions without one....
 
 Then when the No. 1 overall busts, we'll hit on Mr. Irrelevant.
 |   
	          | 
 |  |  |