Phil Riewer -> RE: Twins off-season (12/23/2023 3:21:56 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TJSweens quote:
ORIGINAL: bstinger quote:
ORIGINAL: TJSweens I don't think Mauer belongs and if I'm going to be completely honest, Tony and Kirby probably don't belong for the same reason. After brilliant starts, all three had their careers ruined and shortened by injury or medical issues. When you look at their career totals compared to others in the hall, I think they come up short. I say this even though Tony is my all time favorite Twin. I don't think longevity should be weighted as much as it is by most people. You can be an above average player who played a really long time and have great totals, but were you ever really great? I look 1st for was this player one of the best at his position during his era and was it more than a flash in the pan. I'll take the best for a 5 year span over above average for 15-20. Those guys were great. I guess with this logic Joe belongs, but I'm still disappointed in him. It's all very subjective and everyone can have a different opinion which is why it becomes the talking point that it is. It don't give a rip either way, there are far more important things to worry about. I wouldn't take either of those types. The Hall should be for guys who were great for a long period of time. Not great for 5 years or very good for 15. If you win championships, MVPs, and batting championships yes it should count but you will need it to be similar to Puckett which Mauer never got there.
|
|
|
|