RE: RE:NFL News

RE: RE:NFL News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk

Message

John Childress -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 3:13:26 PM)
At age 40, Brad Johnson has had a very nice NFL career that includes a Super Bowl ring. But to have any chance of winning against the Giants on Sunday, the Cowboys need to return Johnson to the sideline. [image]http://assets.espn.go.com/i/headshots/nfl/players/65/331.jpg[/image]Johnson On Sunday, Dallas kept its season alive despite the fact that Johnson threw for 122 yards -- on 33 attempts. I'm still checking to see if a quarterback has ever thrown for fewer yards on that many attempts. Acting on a hunch, I discovered that former Bears quarterbackShane Matthews once went 24-of-39 for 139 yards, but more on that at a later date. According to ESPN's Ed Werder, the Cowboys may be exploring other quarterbacking options as we speak. A team source told Werder that Johnson "probably" would remain the starter against the Giants, but the team is concerned about Johnson's obsession with the horizontal passing game. In case you haven't noticed, T.O., Patrick Crayton, Miles Austin and Roy Williams haven't made much of an impact over the past two games. Yes, I know Williams caught a touchdown pass, but he has two catches for 10 yards now. As Ed points out, none of the Cowboys' downfield "threats" have a catch of 20 yards or more since Johnson took over. http://myespn.go.com/blogs/nfceast/0-4-187/Johnson-gives-Cowboys-best-chance-to-lose.html

David Levine -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 4:00:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: John Childress Iggit Galoots Bard Johnson was done 3 years ago. 60.3 QB rating with THAT talent on his team! Another team that should have at least worked out Culpepper. Dallas (5-3) apparently has little interest in former Vikings quarterback Daunte Culpepper -- who excelled with the deep ball -- as he failed to impress for Cowboys offensive coordinator Jason Garrett while both were with the Miami Dolphins.

Jim Frenette -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 4:23:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: David Levine quote: ORIGINAL: Jim Frenette Thigpen didn't look too bad yesterday dispite very little experience. I can see a future for him I'm trying to figure out how that happened. He's been the worst QB in football, not looking like he belongs holding a clipboard, but he carved up the J-E-T-S. Since I don't get to see KC, I don't know how much he has actually played. I did here his first start earlier this year was bad, but didn't know he played much more then that

So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 5:15:47 PM)
I'm not trying to cause any problems here ... seriously ... But, have you ever seen a supposed "great" player drop off the map as quickly as Daunte? Will we ever know the real story? You have the injury, the attitude, the racism claims, the everything .... I'm serious, it'd be nice to really know what the problem is. I watched him in college, up close, against Nebraska, who was a power at that time, and he was a man against boys even then. I thought he'd revolutionize the game. And now, he can't get jobs that Quinn Gray can. Even throw out the contract demands, hell we all know pro teams who want to win will pay any price if he gives them a legit shot at winning. It's freakish. And I don't really hear ex-teammates howling for his return, either. It's not like Randy Moss has gone to Pat management and demanded they look at him. Did he stop working at his game? Why would he? I'm not picking a side, I'm just flat-out puzzled.

David Levine -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 5:50:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: So.Mn.Fan I'm not trying to cause any problems here ... seriously ... But, have you ever seen a supposed "great" player drop off the map as quickly as Daunte? Will we ever know the real story? You have the injury, the attitude, the racism claims, the everything .... I'm serious, it'd be nice to really know what the problem is. I watched him in college, up close, against Nebraska, who was a power at that time, and he was a man against boys even then. I thought he'd revolutionize the game. And now, he can't get jobs that Quinn Gray can. Even throw out the contract demands, hell we all know pro teams who want to win will pay any price if he gives them a legit shot at winning. It's freakish. And I don't really hear ex-teammates howling for his return, either. It's not like Randy Moss has gone to Pat management and demanded they look at him. Did he stop working at his game? Why would he? I'm not picking a side, I'm just flat-out puzzled. I'm not sure which thread I said it in, but I believe he had "too much success, too soon". He was an athletically gifted freak surrounded by immense offensive talent in a great system. NFCG, Pro Bowl, etc as a "first time starter". And I think all of those combined to mask his shortcomings as a player and he never worked on those aspects (all the infamous quotes about him not being a studier, etc.). He didn't see the field well, he didn't have much of an in-between game, he'd wait for guys to get open instead of anticipating, and so on. Then when injury, weight and age started to limit his natural abilities, he couldn't fall back on the fundamental aspects of his game that were lacking. So he'd still make some great plays (Oakland and Miami) on the occasional bomb or whatever, but he'd also get sacked too much, and fumble and he just wasn't "steady" enough. Combine that with representing himself, some comments he's made, some comments made about him, and he comes off as a real headcase. A talented headcase, but probably not a guy that is going to take you to the promised land, so I think that while some GMs may see him as an upgrade, it's not enough of an upgrade to deal with the potential drama (ie: Jeff George-itis).

Jeff Jesser -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 7:12:34 PM)
Yeap, to say he's the complete package is doing it justice. Unfortunately for him, he's a complete package of negative things that scare people away. Whether fair or not, there's a perception that he's not a good team guy. I made a bunch of complaints at the time and people said I was full of it. I said at the time of his injury where he didn't stay with the team that he was a terrible leader. People made all kinds of excuses for that. I even heard that it was dangerous for him to be on the sidelines because of what happened to Tice. We'll never know but my hunch remains.

djskillz -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 8:10:35 PM)
I think David's got it exactly right.

Guest -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 9:41:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: djskillz I think David's got it exactly right. ************************************* Yes, Levine is right on the money all the way around on this, IMO.

djskillz -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 10:07:10 PM)
BTW, is there a more out of shape skill position duo in football right now than Crumpler and LenDale White? It's an embarrassment.

djskillz -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/27/2008 10:54:12 PM)
The Titans are damn good. The Colts are not. And Chris Johnson is IMO the fastest man in football right now.

hrerikl -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/28/2008 5:47:32 PM)
http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/28/bill-belichick-peyton-mannings-not-hurt/ quote: But then, when Belichick was asked a different question, he stopped mid-sentence and decided to take a jab at the Colts regarding injury reports. “Going back to Manning for a second, if I’m not mistaken he hasn’t been on the injury report all year, other than maybe one day right at the beginning of the season,” Belichick said. “I’m not really sure what injuries you’re talking about. He hasn’t been listed on the report all year, so I’m assuming he’s not hurt.” Reiss writes (and we agree) that Belichick seemed to be sending a message that the Colts may not be in full compliance with the NFL’s policy on reporting injuries, and that the Colts should be listing Manning each week as probable with a knee injury. Just like the Patriots used to list Tom Brady each week as probable with a shoulder injury.

Jim Frenette -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 11:30:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hrerikl http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/28/bill-belichick-peyton-mannings-not-hurt/ quote: But then, when Belichick was asked a different question, he stopped mid-sentence and decided to take a jab at the Colts regarding injury reports. “Going back to Manning for a second, if I’m not mistaken he hasn’t been on the injury report all year, other than maybe one day right at the beginning of the season,” Belichick said. “I’m not really sure what injuries you’re talking about. He hasn’t been listed on the report all year, so I’m assuming he’s not hurt.” Reiss writes (and we agree) that Belichick seemed to be sending a message that the Colts may not be in full compliance with the NFL’s policy on reporting injuries, and that the Colts should be listing Manning each week as probable with a knee injury. Just like the Patriots used to list Tom Brady each week as probable with a shoulder injury. I think Belichick listed Brady on it o the opposing team would have to spend time looking at what they could do to stop the backup QB

djskillz -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 12:49:45 PM)
Again, this is ridiculous: http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/29/arlen-specter-not-done-with-the-nfl/ Congress has a lot better things to focus on than the NFL, dammit.

Easy E -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 12:57:06 PM)
Bill B is a pissy, whiny beyatch. A good coach, but a vindictive, paranoid, whiny punk as well. He's mad because he used the rule to keep Brady on the injury list constantly, so he could hide legitimate injuries. When asked about them, he'd either no comment or point to the list. And the NFL told him to knock it off and stop skirting the rules. Indy hasn't hidden anything about Manning's injury, they haven't listed him because he's been 100% to start every game. And I guarantee you, Bill B didn't mention it becuase he needs to know. He's just trying to point out that he's picked on. He's still unhappy about it and still making noise. They need to watch this guy like a hawk. His personality is such that the very second he sees another sliver of an opening to cheat, he will poince on it.

Easy E -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 12:58:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: djskillz Again, this is ridiculous: http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/10/29/arlen-specter-not-done-with-the-nfl/ Congress has a lot better things to focus on than the NFL, dammit. Anything that delays the inevitable of the NFL going to an exclusively pay per view model, I support. They shouldn't stop everything else, but I'm fine with them trying to stop major sports from going away from free TV.

hrerikl -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 1:32:17 PM)
There is a lot of rumblings that this round of guys are not going to get suspended. There is this: quote: Falcons defensive tackle Grady Jackson didn’t deny a report that he is on the list of players who tested positive for a weight-loss pill containing a banned substance. But Jackson’s agent reportedly believes — adamantly — that Jackson won’t be suspended. “He is not being suspended,” agent Angelo Wright told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution via text message. Wright also represents Vikings defensive tackle Pat Williams, another player who reportedly tested positive for the same substance. I als just heard Sean Peyton on Sirius satelite radio saying something to the effect of he firmly believed that none of his 3 guys would be suspended and there is more going on behind the scenes than we are aware of in this case. I also heard Ray Edwards yesterday talking about how the guys at the NFL list is all "EA" (is that a supplement brand?) and no one else. Said he wonders if they have a marketing deal with them or something. He also said that when you call the supplement hotline that the NFL set up you (usually?) never get a call back. Didn't understand how they could put product out there labelled "all natural" when it contained a water reduction chemical.

thebigo -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/29/2008 10:36:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: hrerikl There is a lot of rumblings that this round of guys are not going to get suspended. There is this: quote: Falcons defensive tackle Grady Jackson didn’t deny a report that he is on the list of players who tested positive for a weight-loss pill containing a banned substance. But Jackson’s agent reportedly believes — adamantly — that Jackson won’t be suspended. “He is not being suspended,” agent Angelo Wright told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution via text message. Wright also represents Vikings defensive tackle Pat Williams, another player who reportedly tested positive for the same substance. I als just heard Sean Peyton on Sirius satelite radio saying something to the effect of he firmly believed that none of his 3 guys would be suspended and there is more going on behind the scenes than we are aware of in this case. I also heard Ray Edwards yesterday talking about how the guys at the NFL list is all "EA" (is that a supplement brand?) and no one else. Said he wonders if they have a marketing deal with them or something. He also said that when you call the supplement hotline that the NFL set up you (usually?) never get a call back. Didn't understand how they could put product out there labelled "all natural" when it contained a water reduction chemical. That's good news. Bernard Berrian also said that in an interview in the last couple days.

So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/31/2008 5:46:07 PM)
Packers extend Rodgers to 2014. Must like what they see.

John Childress -> RE: RE:NFL News (10/31/2008 5:53:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: So.Mn.Fan Packers extend Rodgers to 2014. Must like what they see. I would trade all 3 of our QBs for him

Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 4:34:58 PM)
Packers \| KGB released Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:37:41 -0700 The Green Bay Packers have released DE Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila.

Duane Sampson -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 4:39:50 PM)
CULPEPPER DOES DEAL WITH LIONS? profootballtalk.com Posted by Mike Florio on November 1, 2008, 5:10 p.m. We’ve gotten a tip from a member of the media that the Lions and quarterback Daunte Culpepper have agreed to terms on a two-year deal. Word is that he’ll join the team on Monday, and that he’ll wear number 11 with the Lions. Culpepper wore No. 11 for most of his time in Minnesota. After leaving the Vikings, he switched to No. 8, which he had worn in college at Central Florida. We sent Culpepper an e-mail to confirm that he has agreed to terms with the Lions, but we’ve yet to hear back from him.

So.Mn.Fan -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 8:17:48 PM)
Seifert confirms it. Culpepper agreed Saturday to a two-year deal with the Detroit Lions. Terms of the deal, scheduled to be signed on Monday, are unknown. Culpepper canceled a scheduled trip to Kansas City to instead visit the Lions earlier in the week. Culpepper left the Lions on Tuesday without a deal but kept in touch, trying to find a home for this season and next season. After several days of negotiations, Culpepper agreed that Detroit was the best fit for him. In September, Culpepper announced his retirement after being offered only one-year deals. Culpepper felt ignored despite his belief in his skills, and when he couldn't find a long-term home he announced his retirement at the age of 31. In agreeing to a deal with Culpepper, the Lions have a quarterback to help finish this season and take them into next season. Culpepper, a former Vikings starter, has great knowledge of the NFC North.

djskillz -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 10:24:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson Packers \| KGB released Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:37:41 -0700 The Green Bay Packers have released DE Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila. Is he done?

thebigo -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 10:29:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson CULPEPPER DOES DEAL WITH LIONS? profootballtalk.com Posted by Mike Florio on November 1, 2008, 5:10 p.m. We’ve gotten a tip from a member of the media that the Lions and quarterback Daunte Culpepper have agreed to terms on a two-year deal. Word is that he’ll join the team on Monday, and that he’ll wear number 11 with the Lions. Culpepper wore No. 11 for most of his time in Minnesota. After leaving the Vikings, he switched to No. 8, which he had worn in college at Central Florida. We sent Culpepper an e-mail to confirm that he has agreed to terms with the Lions, but we’ve yet to hear back from him. So profootbaltalk.com doesn't consider themselves "media"?

Guest -> RE: RE:NFL News (11/1/2008 10:55:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: John Childress quote: ORIGINAL: So.Mn.Fan Packers extend Rodgers to 2014. Must like what they see. I would trade all 3 of our QBs for him ***************************** And two FB's, a TE and a couple of linebackers.

Page: << < prev 102 103 [104] 105 106 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode