RE:NFL News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk



Message

John Childress -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 12:42:37 AM)

Yeah, Harrison held his man on that play and then complained! Brady is doing well overall but he can't hit Moss deep to save his life today. But it is opening up everything for Welker and Stallworth



David Levine -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 12:45:54 AM)

[quote="djskilbr"]I am SO bitter I don't have that game on. I have to watch the freakin' Chargers/Raiders game out here. The Chargers always DESTROY the Raiders. Culpepper is done, I think. Even with his "big game" he didn't look good. Same is the case today. I don't hate losing that guy. And we did quite well to get a 2nd rder for him before the end I think too. Did I mention I'm bitter about not getting to see NE/Dallas? Gah, this sucks. I had a few friends actually call/write in to CBS to complain.[/quote] Don't complain to CBS. Complain to the NFL. Since the L.A. area doesn't have an NFL team, the league long ago designated the L.A. TV market a secondary market to San Diego. NFL rules say the TV networks have to show us any Chargers game on the road and any Chargers home game that's a sellout.



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 12:47:06 AM)

[quote="David Levine"][quote="djskilbr"]I am SO bitter I don't have that game on. I have to watch the freakin' Chargers/Raiders game out here. The Chargers always DESTROY the Raiders. Culpepper is done, I think. Even with his "big game" he didn't look good. Same is the case today. I don't hate losing that guy. And we did quite well to get a 2nd rder for him before the end I think too. Did I mention I'm bitter about not getting to see NE/Dallas? Gah, this sucks. I had a few friends actually call/write in to CBS to complain.[/quote] Don't complain to CBS. Complain to the NFL. Since the L.A. area doesn't have an NFL team, the league long ago designated the L.A. TV market a secondary market to San Diego. NFL rules say the TV networks have to show us any Chargers game on the road and any Chargers home game that's a sellout.[/quote] Awful David, just awful. Man, I hate the Raiders. That's the worst part about it.



Jim Frenette -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 12:53:09 AM)

[quote="David Levine"][quote="djskilbr"]I am SO bitter I don't have that game on. I have to watch the freakin' Chargers/Raiders game out here. The Chargers always DESTROY the Raiders. Culpepper is done, I think. Even with his "big game" he didn't look good. Same is the case today. I don't hate losing that guy. And we did quite well to get a 2nd rder for him before the end I think too. Did I mention I'm bitter about not getting to see NE/Dallas? Gah, this sucks. I had a few friends actually call/write in to CBS to complain.[/quote] Don't complain to CBS. Complain to the NFL. Since the L.A. area doesn't have an NFL team, the league long ago designated the L.A. TV market a secondary market to San Diego. NFL rules say the TV networks have to show us any Chargers game on the road and any Chargers home game that's a sellout.[/quote] Don't they show all Raider games yet as if they still played in the LA market?



Todd M -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 4:09:48 AM)

I've been getting a kick out of some of ProFootballTalk Emmitt Smith-isms so far this year. This is one of the best: On the Jets' quarterback situation, Emmitt said, "Until they change quarterbacks for the Jets, I am not believing in Chad Pennington." So, Emmitt, once Pennington is benched, he's your guy?



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 4:26:14 AM)

Seachickens getting pummeled by a "bad" Saints team. I love it!



Jeff Allen -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 5:18:40 AM)

Nate Burleson is just not a #1 WR. No Darrell Jackson. Branch is hurt.... Seahawks are pretty bad right now because there are no WR's on this team.



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 5:23:01 AM)

Yep. And no Hutch! :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream: :scream:



thebigo -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 6:36:27 AM)

[quote="Todd Mallett"]I've been getting a kick out of some of ProFootballTalk Emmitt Smith-isms so far this year. This is one of the best: On the Jets' quarterback situation, Emmitt said, "Until they change quarterbacks for the Jets, I am not believing in Chad Pennington." So, Emmitt, once Pennington is benched, he's your guy?[/quote] A modern day Yogi Berra. :)



Duane Sampson -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 2:16:49 PM)

Brady Sets NFL Mark Sun Oct 14, 2007 AP reports New England Patriots QB Tom Brady became the first NFL quarterback to throw at least three touchdown passes in each of the first six games of a season when he had three in the first half against Dallas on Sunday. Former San Francisco QB Steve Young threw at least three touchdowns in each of the first five games of the 1998 season. Brady matched his season and career high by adding his fourth TD pass in the third quarter, a 1-yarder to TE Kyle Brady. That increased Tom Brady's NFL-leading touchdown total to 20. The six three-TD games in a season are already a career high for Brady, who had five in 2002, and has 25 in his career. He had at least three TDs only twice last season. A 12-yard pass to WR Wes Welker with 3:34 left in the first half was Brady's third of the game, and the second TD catch by Welker, who earlier had a 35-yard score. Brady threw a 6-yard TD to WR Randy Moss on the Patriots' first drive of the game. Brady threw four TDs in the third game against Buffalo, and had three in the other four games before Sunday.



Cheesehead Craig -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 2:28:02 PM)

Brady = MVP. It's as much of a no-contest as Peterson for ROY. New England is not losing a game this year unless Brady gets hurt. We're witnessing history folks.



Toby Stumbo -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 2:43:47 PM)

[quote="Todd Mallett"]I've been getting a kick out of some of ProFootballTalk Emmitt Smith-isms so far this year. This is one of the best: On the Jets' quarterback situation, Emmitt said, "Until they change quarterbacks for the Jets, I am not believing in Chad Pennington." So, Emmitt, once Pennington is benched, he's your guy?[/quote] He also said the Bears would shut down AD, me thinks he's nervous about AD breaking his records. :whistling:



John Childress -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 3:28:06 PM)

[quote="Cheesehead Craig"]Brady = MVP. It's as much of a no-contest as Peterson for ROY. New England is not losing a game this year unless Brady gets hurt. We're witnessing history folks.[/quote] Don't rule the Colts out yet.



Trekgeekscott -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 6:25:16 PM)

[quote="Cheesehead Craig"]Brady = MVP. It's as much of a no-contest as Peterson for ROY. New England is not losing a game this year unless Brady gets hurt. We're witnessing history folks.[/quote] though i would tend to agree...much the same was said about he 85 Bears. There is always some team that comes along and surprises the seemingly unbeatable juggernaut. Though I don't see who (other than the Colts) can beat the Pats right now...there is always some team that comes along and plays spoiler. And then there is the whole playing for a championship thing. Belichick would more likely sit his starters once he has home field wrapped up to keep them fresh and uninjured. However, I think the AFC could very well have a 16-0 and a 15-1 team playing against each other this year in the AFCCG. Best game of the year is scheduled for November 4th in Indianapolis.



Toby Stumbo -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 6:36:33 PM)

How about that Vinny Testaverde guy? :shock:



John Childress -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 6:42:09 PM)

I would put it this way 25-50% chance of a Pats loss: 9 Sun, Nov 4 at Indianapolis 14 Sun, Dec 9 Pittsburgh 17 Sat, Dec 29 at NY Giants (Pats will have everything locked up; swirling winds could kill passing game) 5-25% chance of a Pats loss: 11 Sun, Nov 18 at Buffalo 12 Sun, Nov 25 Philadelphia 13 Mon, Dec 3 at Baltimore <5% chance of a Pats loss: 7 Sun, Oct 21 at Miami 8 Sun, Oct 28 Washington 15 Sun, Dec 16 NY Jets 16 Sun, Dec 23 Miami



Trekgeekscott -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 7:03:56 PM)

Miami, IMHO, has a good chance of not winning a single game this year. They are that bad! Shouldn't have let Daunte Culpepper go if you ask me.



John Childress -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 7:16:50 PM)

Tedd Ginn!



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 7:17:16 PM)

I think the Pats will still murder the Colts actually. Just better overall on both sides of the ball in EVERY facet. I still see them winning by 2 td's. Hell, they should have beat the Colts LAST year and obviously have gotten a LOT better while the Colts have regressed. I'm just happy that Brady finally has WR's to match Peyton's. I always said he was better than Peyton, and now they're on a level playing field and we're seeing just that IMO.



So.Mn.Fan -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 7:31:48 PM)

Sorry, huge Pats lover/respecter here. It's the "perfect storm" year. Added the missing pieces, their best players are in their prime, and the NFL has pissed them off. (spying bs) What you notice about them is, when top guys sit out for suspensions or injuries, they still win, their replacements are tremendous, and guys continue to support each other. Think Maroney just got a message the past couple weeks? It's like "we will win without you, but please hurry back". Just a juggernaut right now. Having fun, rolling, taking punches and still standing. And they are run by cold-blooded killers. You could feel it getting uncomfortable out there with the big lead and a few minutes left, most "nice" NFL teams take a knee (ouch) and shake hands. Nope, smash in another touchdown. Yeah, you hate it when it happens to you, but when you want to be the best, you don't worry about how others look at you. You could see Phillips was rashed about it, but what can he say? Shut up and stop them. The Pats are relentless with all parts of the game. they drive each other. Moss is a perfect fit for that mentality. Undefeated? Very very possible.



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/15/2007 8:10:34 PM)

Well said, Scott. Hopefully Brady will retire early after a couple more rings so the Vikes can finally win one! :D



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/16/2007 1:16:28 AM)

Umm, did anyone else know that a game in 2 weeks is going to be held in LONDON? Giants/Miami. Crazy. And I guess there's talk of a SuperBowl being held in London soon. That would be wild. Anyone been to that stadium (Wembley) in London? How is it? That has to suck for the Giants/Dolphins though. Somebody loses a home game PLUS the travel schedule.



Jim Frenette -> RE:NFL News (10/16/2007 1:40:07 AM)

[quote="djskilbr"]Umm, did anyone else know that a game in 2 weeks is going to be held in LONDON? Giants/Miami. Crazy. And I guess there's talk of a SuperBowl being held in London soon. That would be wild. Anyone been to that stadium (Wembley) in London? How is it? That has to suck for the Giants/Dolphins though. Somebody loses a home game PLUS the travel schedule.[/quote] I think it is a horrible idea playing over there. Football isn't the only sport either. Basketball had preseason games and are thinking of regular season games over there and Hockey had the Ducks and Kings open their seasons over in London. They are all just looking for a couple extra dollars while the players suffer the jet lag.



djskillz -> RE:NFL News (10/16/2007 1:42:06 AM)

[quote="Jim Frenette"][quote="djskilbr"]Umm, did anyone else know that a game in 2 weeks is going to be held in LONDON? Giants/Miami. Crazy. And I guess there's talk of a SuperBowl being held in London soon. That would be wild. Anyone been to that stadium (Wembley) in London? How is it? That has to suck for the Giants/Dolphins though. Somebody loses a home game PLUS the travel schedule.[/quote] I think it is a horrible idea playing over there. Football isn't the only sport either. Basketball had preseason games and are thinking of regular season games over there and Hockey had the Ducks and Kings open their seasons over in London. They are all just looking for a couple extra dollars while the players suffer the jet lag.[/quote] At least the NFL made their bye weeks the next week. But I agree Jim.



Todd M -> RE:NFL News (10/16/2007 2:01:31 AM)

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/nflinsider/2006/09/commissioner_says_hell_study_p.html Commissioner Says He'll Study Putting Radio Receivers In Players' Helmets to Negate Crowd-Noise Issues EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J.--Roger Goodell said today that one of the issues he's studying in his early days as NFL commissioner is whether the league should take steps to nullify the competitive advantage that some teams get from crowd noise in their home stadiums. In an afternoon meeting with reporters at Giants Stadium, Goodell said he loves having loud, enthusiastic crowds at games but wonders whether the offenses of visiting clubs should have to suffer when their players can't hear quarterbacks' signals. Goodell said that he and members of the league's competition committee will study possible remedies, including a suggestion to place radio receivers in the helmets of other offensive players so that they can hear the quarterback over the crowd noise. Terrible idea. If you want to make the game better make everything reviewable and give two challenges but DON'T take one away when you were right and the call is reversed.



Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode