Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  263 264 [265] 266 267   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 7:10:50 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26286
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?


Both guys they traded for make some money....Reagor 1.8 and Blacklock 1.3

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 9/2/2022 7:13:33 AM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6601
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 7:12:05 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26286
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Tom Pelissero
@TomPelissero
·
10m
Former #Lions QB David Blough, who was waived hours after the 53-man cutdown, plans to sign with the #Vikings practice squad, per source.

Does he blow or does he bluff?


More a better Bleh than we were going to have on the roster or PS...

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6602
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 8:57:54 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 27463
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?



spotrac says $2.42mm....


And do I hear 2.6... 2.6 million... all in for 2.6... last call...
Post #: 6603
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:06:07 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44242
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?


Both guys they traded for make some money....Reagor 1.8 and Blacklock 1.3

Weren't we sitting around $12M before those those moves.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 6604
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:08:26 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17809
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline 		Mannion signed to Seahawks PS

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 6605
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:13:33 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 27463
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?


Both guys they traded for make some money....Reagor 1.8 and Blacklock 1.3

Weren't we sitting around $12M before those those moves.


Reports varied. The trades perhaps ate up some (not sure on the total net) and since PS players don't practice for free, figure (very) roughly ~165-250K for a season for each. That's a few more million.

Maybe we'll go with just 15 on the PS to keep some cap flexibility for in-season needs

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 9/2/2022 9:15:06 AM >
Post #: 6606
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:14:06 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33453
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?


Both guys they traded for make some money....Reagor 1.8 and Blacklock 1.3

Weren't we sitting around $12M before those those moves.

It's very confusing. Supposedly we started with 6.5M available and made moves to free up more and when the dust settles we're broke.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 6607
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:19:10 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 27463
Status: offline 		Referencing the cap, Kwesi says "I'll continue to say that every NFL team has challenges."

OK, technically that's accurate depending on how "challenges" is defined. But really, that's a BS statement.
Post #: 6608
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:32:27 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26286
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

So much for putting some $ together. Tomason reporting we'll have just a hair over 2.25 million in cap space.

If correct what happened?


Both guys they traded for make some money....Reagor 1.8 and Blacklock 1.3

Weren't we sitting around $12M before those those moves.

It's very confusing. Supposedly we started with 6.5M available and made moves to free up more and when the dust settles we're broke.


Practice Squad costs extra $$$ now and they added more:

How much do they make?
Unlike true roster members, practice squad players aren’t making much money by comparison. Players are paid week-to-week, rather than a yearly salary — and it’s based on the number of years players have been in the league.

Players with two or less accrued seasons of experience will make $11,500 per week, while veterans with more experience can negotiate a weekly pay of between $15,400 and $19,900.

Are there any restrictions on who can be put on a practice squad?
Yes, and it’s here things get a little complicated, because once again it’s based on experience. Out of the 16 players on the practice squad a team can have:

Any number of players who have not accrued at least nine games in an NFL season.
Up to four players who have accrued no more than two NFL seasons.
Up to six players with no limitations on experience.
Four players can be protected each week, so they can’t be signed by another team off their practice squad. However, any unprotected player may be signed to a 53 man roster at any time.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6609
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 9:34:42 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26286
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline 		So $160k to $340k to be on the practice squad....not a bad gig.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6610
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 10:32:46 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18174
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Referencing the cap, Kwesi says "I'll continue to say that every NFL team has challenges."

OK, technically that's accurate depending on how "challenges" is defined. But really, that's a BS statement.

M first thought is, "Of course, you have to pay for a QB."
And you always have to pay the big bucks to some others as well ... but Kirk isnt even in the top 10 anymore according to a tweet from Spotrac i saw this morning. But of course it's challenging, thats why we hired you
Post #: 6611
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 10:39:31 AM   
Terry Stoneberg


Posts: 343
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline 		I must really be behind on the rules. I thought only a top group of players counted against the salary cap, and that almost always excluded the PS players.
Post #: 6612
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 10:56:46 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18174
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline 		PS is new to me as well, Terry
Post #: 6613
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 10:59:24 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 44242
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Terry Stoneberg

I must really be behind on the rules. I thought only a top group of players counted against the salary cap, and that almost always excluded the PS players.

That was my understanding too.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 6614
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 11:10:15 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 26286
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Terry Stoneberg

I must really be behind on the rules. I thought only a top group of players counted against the salary cap, and that almost always excluded the PS players.


It use to be for players that never had NFL; now it has been increased to have veterans. I believe it use to be be 4-6 players but due to covid and other injuries they decided to keep it. I didn't realize that 4 were protected from being sniped also. Basically the roster is 57 players then.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 6615
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 11:14:50 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9305
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terry Stoneberg

I must really be behind on the rules. I thought only a top group of players counted against the salary cap, and that almost always excluded the PS players.

That was my understanding too.


it makes sense because teams can pay practise squad players as much as they want - i think that we paid sloter over $600k on the ps a few years back....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 6616
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 11:15:43 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 11994
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Terry Stoneberg

I must really be behind on the rules. I thought only a top group of players counted against the salary cap, and that almost always excluded the PS players.

Reagor, Mullens and Blacklock all have cap numbers that make the Top 53. Their cap numbers minus the guys they knocked out of Top 53 probably takes 2M in cap space.

But I think where we are losing more cap space is Dead Cap for 2021 draft picks we cut. Spotrac has guys like Mond, Surratt and W Davis with dead cap numbers. Also Mannion.

Anyway, let the games begin. Maybe Schlottman will be a better answer at center and Ingram has the look of a solid RG. Offensive weapons are elite and we supposedly have a staff that knows how to use them better.

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 9/2/2022 11:17:23 AM >
Post #: 6617
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 12:12:17 PM   
jbusse

 

Posts: 1308
Joined: 9/11/2013
From: Atlanta, GA
Status: offline 		Salary cap is computed differently during the offseason vs. during the season.

During the offseason (early March to first week of September), salary cap is the top-51 player contracts with allowances for dead cap, IR, and PUP.

During the regular season, salary cap is the sum of the 53-man active roster + practice squad + dead cap + IR + PUP.

My guess is that part of the reason available cap space dropped recently is because we are just now switching from the offseason calculation to the regular season calculation + going from ISM to Reagor. Roster spots 52 and 53 is a combined $1.4 million (since now counting top-53 instead of top-51), Reagor's cap hit is ~$1 million more than ISM, and practice squad is ~$2.6 million.
Post #: 6618
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 12:42:07 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 38396
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KGA, I read that Kirk was struggling with the first team defense, but it was said to be because defenses are usually ahead of offenses this time of year.

I think a passing game is 80% QB/20% WR, so I don't think Erin will miss Adams so much. And I may be trying reverse psychology, it has worked before, hope it still works, despite being called out.

Rodgers is a very good QB, but his WRs are a bunch of Turds. Aaron may try to polish them, but they will still be Turds. It's going to be a very bad year in cheeseheadland.



One thing that makes QBs like Rodgers, Wilson, Mahomes good is keeping a play alive with their legs until someone gets open. In the case of Rodgers for the last several years he's always looked to Adams in those situations. He's still a great QB, but losing a talent like Adams, and his WR2 in Valdez-Scantling is going to hurt that offense quite a bit. You still can't sleep on them or Rodgers will torch you...but they wont be the juggernaut they were.

Mahomes faces a similar situation losing his favorite outlet in Hill, but I think the Chiefs have far better addressed that loss.

_____________________________

I don't want to go through things that don't kill me and make me stronger anymore.
Post #: 6619
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 12:42:40 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 27463
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Referencing the cap, Kwesi says "I'll continue to say that every NFL team has challenges."

OK, technically that's accurate depending on how "challenges" is defined. But really, that's a BS statement.

M first thought is, "Of course, you have to pay for a QB."
And you always have to pay the big bucks to some others as well ... but Kirk isnt even in the top 10 anymore according to a tweet from Spotrac i saw this morning. But of course it's challenging, thats why we hired you


He has a lot of dead cap where he will be paid but not on the roster.

Try adding all the money he will be paid and divide it by the number of years remaining on the contract.

Edit: $80 million, which includes $12.5 million he'll get for not being a Viking, over two years.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 9/2/2022 12:50:21 PM >
Post #: 6620
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 12:55:09 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 27463
Status: offline 		$25 million in dead cap this year. 80% of it goes to Barr, Pierce, Rudolph, Gladney (his estate I guess).
Post #: 6621
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 1:34:37 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39703
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		Anyone read Terrence Newman's thoughts on playing for Zimmer? Talked about how difficult it was...and he finished in 2017. I can only imagine how shitty it got.
Post #: 6622
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 1:36:23 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39703
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		https://www.si.com/fannation/bringmethesports/vikings/former-vikings-coordinator-allegedly-referred-to-mike-zimmer-as-satan
Post #: 6623
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 1:41:26 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39703
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		There's that and more talk of it which I'm sure y'all can find easy enough...
Post #: 6624
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2022 1:42:47 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 39703
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		Kinda hitting too close to the season. It's time to move forward...it's just kind of eye opening.
Post #: 6625
Page:   <<   < prev  263 264 [265] 266 267   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  263 264 [265] 266 267   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode