Bill Johanesen
Posts: 28598
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer
quote:
ORIGINAL: fmaltes
Lets not waste time with Trey Lance. Also, there is real uncertainty with his injury too.
https://www.si.com/nfl/49ers/news/49ers-quarterback-trey-lance-is-not-good-on-game-film
Waste time? 8 Million for 2 years and a third to have a top backup and a QBOTF?
I'd think if he was all that, SF would want to keep him.
Especially considering Purdy is no sure thing to be ready to start the season. And even if he is, he's hardly proven he's the guy long-term.
I would actually go with this David Justice Moneyball play....SF is paying more of your salary than we are.
SF is in as bad of Salary Cap as we are.
Probably not as painful when you're a contender.
Pretty sure everyone assumes they are a contender in the offseason.
But some actually are...
In April. I wouldn't be so sure.
I'm not so sure if the Vikes would have lost 31-7 in the NFCCG we'd call them a contender
Are you telling me if the Vikes made the NFCCG last year, you wouldn't be calling them a contender right now?
I don't know. Like I said probably not too many people around here would be calling them a contender after a 31-7 spanking - but I probably would, yes.
Knowiing me, I probably considered them ready for the SB after the 40-doughnut fiasco
31-7 spanking with their 4th string QB.
Contenders with their first, second and third string QB.
Us, with our starting QB ... not so much.
Oh snap, I thought the 31-7 thing was a hypothetical!
Poor Purdy came back in and secured some record for lowest ypa or something that will never be broken.
But at least up until his injury he showed he has a bit of IT. Which leads me to... draft Georgia QB Bennett Stetson late. Um, I mean Stetson Bennett.
Stetson Fleming Bennett IV to be precise.
Please don’t use his full name again. He sounds like the Fourth Earl of Snotbury or something, not a draft prospect.
This draft is shaping up as a ‘War of the Gargantuans’ it seems, between you and Marty over our late rd QB selection … ‘your’ choice Bennett (you’ve plugged him several times) vs Marty’s DTR … its added a whole new level of intrigue.
I hope you bring your ‘A’ game …
Uh, twice. Frankly, there is no way they take a projected backup QB with a late rounder when they can trade down for... whatever. I don't know what Marty is saying but I'm sure he is waffling. Waffle House should add a name to a dish after him. Or just name the whole company Marty House.
How about Francis Asbury Tarkenton.
I didn't think about the Sir Francis thing. Hmmm there's an angle ...
Also, I dont understand your ‘no way they take …’ comment. With only 2 QBs on the roster, I’ll be surprised if they don’t take a late rd flyer, regardless of what they do early. I suppose an UDFA camp arm would be typical …
just hoping the clouds open up and it rains QBs this year. While preparing myself for drought.
Who are you replying to?
You.
Oh, that was just a Kwesi jab re how he likes to trade down.
This exchange is too long screen wise so I'm done with it.
|
Printable Version
RE: General Vikes Talk - 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread