Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: ratoppenheimer, Jeff Jesser
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  187 188 189 [190] 191   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:41:16 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29159
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

A mediocre performance against the Rams, and I think Sam is gone, not even a franchise tag.


The only think left would be a tag and trade done on the sly. Since his agent can't negotiate with other teams, it would be breaking rules and it would be risky. I don't think Kwesi wants to go down that road.

And not every team that needs a QB will be able to fork over cap for even a decent QB deal.
Post #: 4726
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:43:04 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

Oh … And just to be clear …

waiting for one good pass on Mon to coronate Sam’s ass … NO.

Sam has to have a great game against the Rams just to START rebuilding his own dike.

Anything less than very good with a win doesnt do it … it has to be at least as good as the Lions game was bad … just to get to 1-1 square one in critical games. And 1-1 buys you nothing in this world, certainly not 40M of my play money.

Its not until our SECOND playoff game, if there is one, that Sam starts to move his needle with this team. If our regime has any balls at all.

Sorry. Not my rules, take it or leave it … just the cold ruthless law of nature, whether you’re a qb, lion, wildebeest or samurai otter.

Man, the expectations have really gone up in this place.

Again, Cousins took his team to 13-4 and you couldn't stand him. And that team was much worse than this year's ...

Hang out until Mon, you may or not get some help with your double-standard from Sam.

Monday makes no difference to me. At 14-3 with the #6 passer rating, he has done enough to convince me he can lead this team a long ways. If he had the offensive line that Jared Goff or Jalen Hurts had, there is no telling what the Vikings' record would have been.

You guys do realize, without Darrisaw, he has one of the worst offensive lines in football, right?

This isn't about Darnold or Cousins. It's about Darnold or McCarthy.


How are you going to get a great offensive line when you're paying SD 40+? How are you going to build up the defense and get CBs like Reed?

This isn't about Darnold or McCarthy. It's about Darnold or McCarthy/Jones + team building.

Pretty nice deflection on Cousins. Had me laughing, they nailed you on it.

Cousins was not a leader. I would have sent him packing the day he refused to get vaccinated. It's not all about numbers. He had zero leadership qualities. He's also nine years older than Darnold, and it was really starting to show (look at his production this season).

So no, they didn't nail me (as you say). I only refused to answer such a dumb question.

Why? Because we are talking about our options moving forward, not about comparing our current quarterback to our old quarterback. For that matter, we could compare Darnold to Fran Tarkenton if you want.


I really don't give two F's about a Cousin to Darnold comparison. However it is HILARIOUS how you changed your tune to wins as the barometer and you got called on it. Cousins had 1 less win with a worse team.

You want a breakdown on JJ vs SD? There are plenty of analysts with JJM tape out there. Google them. Here's my takeaways: More accurate and mobile than SD. Appears to process extremely well. Throws with anticipation. Darnold has superior arm strength but JJ has a plus arm. Can anyone project how that will translate to the NFL? Well there's 1 person I trust = KOC. If KOC is ready to roll with JJ, so am I.

You also haven't addressed the cap difference/team building. In one breath you complain that Cousins put us in cap hell but Darnold will command more than Cousins. How are you going to build a team to win with 45M committed to Darnold and no draft picks? Your window is about two years if you go all in this year signing SD and backloading FA contracts. AND the cap dig-out at the end will be far greater and longer than the dig-out from Cousins.

< Message edited by Pager -- 1/10/2025 11:51:20 AM >


_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4727
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:45:13 AM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
It's interesting watching a breakdown of poor playoff performance by Daniel Jones (against the Eagles), after seeing a poor performance by Sam Darnold.

What is REALLY cool on this video, is the trick play the Giants used to score a TD from the 6 yard line, it is at 17:44 :

https://youtu.be/cURnLO13b9s?si=bI53NYgyV4ls69WU

I can see where Daniel Jones might bring some things that Sam doesn't do when a play breaks down.

< Message edited by marty -- 1/10/2025 11:50:43 AM >


_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4728
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:45:59 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

A mediocre performance against the Rams, and I think Sam is gone, not even a franchise tag.


The only think left would be a tag and trade done on the sly. Since his agent can't negotiate with other teams, it would be breaking rules and it would be risky. I don't think Kwesi wants to go down that road.

And not every team that needs a QB will be able to fork over cap for even a decent QB deal.



You can do a non-exclusive tag. SD could negotiate with teams. And the trade comp doesn't have to be two firsts. Davonte Adams was hit with this tag then traded to the Raiders for a 1st and a 2nd. It also wouldn't have any cap ramifications, I believe.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4729
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:46:53 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14358
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

KOC might be planning that, but doesn't that tell your starting QB you don't have confidence in him, in the red zone ?

If we had an interior offensive line that could actually move the defensive line it would all be a moot point. Philadelphia and Detroit don't have to worry about drawing up crafty pass plays. They just run it down your throat. The same could be said for Buffalo, Baltimore, you name it.

Our offensive line is a joke, people.
fn guy decides to spend the day echoing chambering things others have been saying for years..

All in an attempt to defend/ deflect from the fact that SD is a choking dog in the big moments.. untill proven otherwise.. he is a cheap KFC
Post #: 4730
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:51:04 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 78202
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

My apologies to the board for my part in resurrecting Cousins as a flyswatter.

I’m done with it for now.

No apologies necessary. I brought him up last week when such a double standard was being applied. With Sam's predecessor all we heard was that he pads his stats, screw qb rating because the only stat that matters is the last two minutes, he holds the ball too long, he can't win big games.

It's like you said; if everything about that game was the same, except the name of the QB was Kirk Cousins, the same guy defending Sam would be at the front of the angry mob with torches and pitchforks.

With that, I apologize for continuing the KC comparison.

Actually, that's not fair. Cousins had a body of work showing his failures during crunch time with the Vikings. Darnold had 3-4 bad passes on Sunday night, and outside of that has been spectacular all season. If we got rid of every guy that had one off night, there wouldn't be anyone left on the roster. Reichard would have been gone eight weeks ago and our interior o-line would all be free agents.

So no, it wasn't an apples to apples comparison.

And on that note, why is it that I have to prove my point? Why don't you guys try proving yours at some point?

What makes you think McCarthy is a better option than Darnold next season? That's the question at hand. Yet still, nothing but crickets. One person said because he won a college championship. That was the only rationale, as bad as it could be. Another brought up salary, which has a little merit should the Vikes sign him or franchise tag him.

I haven't seen one person break down the X's and O's on what McCarthy offers, and it's pretty obvious why.



Only "3-4 bad passes" lol. Not to mention what you have repeated the past few days... only 1-2 passes "he'd like to have back".

WW


If only we had plenty of footage of Sam with time to throw and open receivers...

...oh wait...
Post #: 4731
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 11:53:53 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 78202
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

A mediocre performance against the Rams, and I think Sam is gone, not even a franchise tag.


The only think left would be a tag and trade done on the sly. Since his agent can't negotiate with other teams, it would be breaking rules and it would be risky. I don't think Kwesi wants to go down that road.

And not every team that needs a QB will be able to fork over cap for even a decent QB deal.



You can do a non-exclusive tag. SD could negotiate with teams. And the trade comp doesn't have to be two firsts. Davonte Adams was hit with this tag then traded to the Raiders for a 1st and a 2nd. It also wouldn't have any cap ramifications, I believe.


As long as you can work out a trade by the start of free agency.

Is a 2nd or 3rd round pick worth missing out on a couple of top free agents?
Post #: 4732
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:02:07 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

A mediocre performance against the Rams, and I think Sam is gone, not even a franchise tag.


The only think left would be a tag and trade done on the sly. Since his agent can't negotiate with other teams, it would be breaking rules and it would be risky. I don't think Kwesi wants to go down that road.

And not every team that needs a QB will be able to fork over cap for even a decent QB deal.



You can do a non-exclusive tag. SD could negotiate with teams. And the trade comp doesn't have to be two firsts. Davonte Adams was hit with this tag then traded to the Raiders for a 1st and a 2nd. It also wouldn't have any cap ramifications, I believe.


As long as you can work out a trade by the start of free agency.

Is a 2nd or 3rd round pick worth missing out on a couple of top free agents?



I did a little more research and it does have a cap hit, same as the exclusive tag.

We'd have about 30M in cap space using the non-exclusive tag. We could also restructure a few contracts for more space heading into free agency. And structure FA deals with more signing bonus.

With our dearth of draft picks, a 2nd could be impactful and immediate (I also think we'd get a conditional 2026 pick), while we wouldn't get a comp pick until 2026 and only a low 3rd. I don't think it has to be either or, but your point is well taken.

< Message edited by Pager -- 1/10/2025 12:04:14 PM >


_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4733
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:08:43 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
KOC did a great job all year. Took the stacked wins and propped Sam up. All season long. Culminating in the Packers win. Everybody was propping him up.

If he throws 4 TD’s in the RZ against Detroit everyone’s still propping him up. And not adding a footnote that KOC called a bad game btw. All Sam. Sam was given everything and he said no thanks. I’m just a big weeny with really thick yellow toenails everyone is grossed out by. I’m not the guy. Moments too big.

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4734
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:10:04 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14358
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

KOC did a great job all year. Took the stacked wins and propped Sam up. All season long. Culminating in the Packers win. Everybody was propping him up.

If he throws 4 TD’s in the RZ against Detroit everyone’s still propping him up. And not adding a footnote that KOC called a bad game btw. All Sam. Sam was given everything and he said no thanks. I’m just a big weeny with really thick yellow toenails everyone is grossed out by. I’m not the guy. Moments too big.

I beg to differ..
Post #: 4735
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:12:36 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
You think I’m wrong about the toenails?

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4736
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:13:07 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Here's some of the JJ analysis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y57IK0Tp8g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k56Y6Qq0j-w
https://www.vikings.com/video/daniel-jeremiah-s-film-breakdown-of-j-j-mccarthy-s-college-tape

And even one by KOC
https://www.vikings.com/video/kevin-o-connell-film-session-breaking-down-j-j-mccarthy-s-college-tape

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4737
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:25:36 PM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
IF KOC does this exact same trick play with Daniel Jones at QB, Daniel Jones and Aaron Jones run to the right, Aaron Jones takes the snap and hands the ball off to either Ty Chandler or Cam Akers, who discreetly runs to the left and scores a TD (at 17:44) :

https://youtu.be/cURnLO13b9s?si=bI53NYgyV4ls69WU

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4738
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:35:44 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19566
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
DJ's is most likely on the 53 so that we can get a comp pick if he walks. He has to be to qualify.
Post #: 4739
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:36:56 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19566
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online
And forget about him on the goal line with a sneak. We continue to deploy Brandon Powell as the 'pusher'
Post #: 4740
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:47:01 PM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Check out the play, it is NOT a sneak, it's a great trick play, the play goes to RB2.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4741
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:50:06 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14358
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

You think I’m wrong about the toenails?

Propping and KOC..

Fn KOC is not a good play caller.

His choices had me screaming..WTF WAS THAT??

A lot
Post #: 4742
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 12:54:03 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14358
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

And forget about him on the goal line with a sneak. We continue to deploy Brandon Powell as the 'pusher'

Yea .. it’s not likewe don’t have a big guy or two..

It’s a dead giveaway away, but every other team that practices and uses it has a lot of success..
Post #: 4743
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:00:54 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 78202
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
Jefferson is a unanimous 1st team All-Pro.

Long snapper Andrew DePaola also made 1st team.

Van Ginkle made 2nd team.
Post #: 4744
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:02:22 PM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
We can criticize KOC for not having more quick hitters against Detroit, but if KOC wanted to attack a 2ndary that had injuries, it was a good idea to attack them with the plays they tried, just need the QB to execute those plays early in the game.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4745
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:06:35 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 78202
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

We can criticize KOC for not having more quick hitters against Detroit, but if KOC wanted to attack a 2ndary that had injuries, it was a good idea to attack them with the plays they tried, just need the QB to execute those plays early in the game.


And the quick hitters were there. Sam just either didn't see them or refused to throw them.

Sam was a breath of fresh air after Kirk with the way that he attacked down the field. But there probably should be a little more balance. Sometimes its OK to take the shorter throw (unless its going to end up short of the sticks on 3rd or 4th down...)
Post #: 4746
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:14:13 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41097
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Like KOC says: ‘Make the complex simple. Even if you’re already simple, and simple isn’t simple really. Wow just imagine trying to grasp the complex - kaplow! So you really just try and dumb it down best you can.’

You need a cerebral ninja assassin to truly run KOC’s offense. JJM is him.

_____________________________

The ego holds on to pain from the past to prevent pain in the future, which causes pain in the present.

Keith Crossley
Post #: 4747
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:36:11 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

We can criticize KOC for not having more quick hitters against Detroit, but if KOC wanted to attack a 2ndary that had injuries, it was a good idea to attack them with the plays they tried, just need the QB to execute those plays early in the game.


And the quick hitters were there. Sam just either didn't see them or refused to throw them.

Sam was a breath of fresh air after Kirk with the way that he attacked down the field. But there probably should be a little more balance. Sometimes its OK to take the shorter throw (unless its going to end up short of the sticks on 3rd or 4th down...)


THIS.

You can tell some on this thread have not looked AT ALL at the resources posted. Deep, intermediate, short were all open in the first half. AND SD had the time and could step up in the pocket.

100% on SD.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4748
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 1:39:29 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10513
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Marty, I usually don't agree with much you post, but I do love the idea of having DJ active and 2nd QB. Even 1 play with him there in the RZ could cause all kinds of defensive confusion. Getting it on tape and if we win the game, makes us a lot more difficult to defend in the RZ for future opponents.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4749
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/10/2025 2:26:07 PM   
marty


Posts: 13163
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
It's not my idea. KOC is being coy about using Daniel Jones, the same way he was coy about picking him up.

I think they will have some sort of play(s) drawn up for him, possibly a red zone play.

I LOVE the play the Giants used at the 6 yard line, it really fooled the defense, and I could see something like that working for Minnesota (17:44) :

https://youtu.be/cURnLO13b9s?si=bI53NYgyV4ls69WU

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 4750
Page:   <<   < prev  187 188 189 [190] 191   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  187 188 189 [190] 191   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode