David Levine
Posts: 78274
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer quote:
ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser Really interesting topic just came up on NFL Live. They were talking about Watson's injury. According to him they are 68 in the red for the salary cap next year so they HAVE to go cheap at QB (this assumes he's done for all of 25). His take "I would be on the phone with the Vikings as soon as the season ends and see what it takes to get JJM. They have 2 assets that may temp. Miles Garrett or the #2 overall pick." Would you do either or 1 and a combo of something else? if it came to trading mccarthy, i'd really try to talk the NY giants into dexter lawrance and their 1st, and 2nd.... but i'd rather trade darnold.... LOL. You guys place a lot of value on a guy with zero pass completions and one knee injury. We draft a guy in the top ten. A year later, without ever completing a pass, he is suddenly worth a great player, a first and a second? How does that work, exactly? Because he would be the top QB in this year's draft. LOL And so teams are suddenly going to overspend wildly for a guy that was supposed to be a late first/early second round pick the year before? I got news for you, the Vikings drafting McCarthy at 10 was a wild jump to begin with. Yes. That's exactly how it works. On bad QB draft years, guys are always overdrafted. If JJ is seen as a better prospect than anyone in this draft, he's going to have more value than any of them to many QB starved teams. Yes, you give up 1 cheap year of control (although you're also paying 2024 10th overall pick vs 2025 Top 5 pick money), but he also has a year of working under KOC - who clearly has a much higher reputation around the league than he does in your household.
|