Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  220 221 222 [223] 224   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 6:15:50 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41257
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Not at all an obscure reference

_____________________________

They’re all bums
Post #: 5551
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 6:57:11 PM  1 votes
Todd M

 

Posts: 41257
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
I think that’s enough football for me this year.

Gonna be KC vs Philly and I’m say hard pass. 2 fan bases that don’t need and or deserve happiness.

Wonder if people are still running on - this season was pleasant bc I didn’t expect anything.

I wish I ignored the whole season.

_____________________________

They’re all bums
Post #: 5552
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 7:08:25 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20342
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I think that’s enough football for me this year.

Gonna be KC vs Philly and I’m say hard pass. 2 fan bases that don’t need and or deserve happiness.

Wonder if people are still running on - this season was pleasant bc I didn’t expect anything.

I wish I ignored the whole season.

The regular season was pleasant. I had no belief that they'd do anything in the playoffs. Too much soft with these guys. However them not being even remotely competitive was disappointing.
Post #: 5553
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 8:50:57 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14551
Status: offline
Worst.. Super Bowl , again…

No one who watched SB IV will ever be a chiefs fans, if you were a Vikings fans.. ever..

And Philly?

It has the Phil in it., so.. nope…
Plus they suck as fans..
Post #: 5554
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 8:52:23 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I think that’s enough football for me this year.

Gonna be KC vs Philly and I’m say hard pass. 2 fan bases that don’t need and or deserve happiness.

Wonder if people are still running on - this season was pleasant bc I didn’t expect anything.

I wish I ignored the whole season.

this is is true...can't ****in believe those two teams are in...gross
Post #: 5555
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 8:53:58 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41257
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Obv it became a game. Not that it mattered. Buff receiver couldn’t catch a gum drop to keep his teams chances alive. What a bum.

0% chance I watch one second of the SB.

_____________________________

They’re all bums
Post #: 5556
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 8:57:08 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
im only paying attention to this SB to see if I win my squares
Post #: 5557
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 8:58:11 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6830
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
I would rather have had Detroit in
Post #: 5558
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/26/2025 10:32:36 PM   
marty


Posts: 13242
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 5559
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 7:25:26 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17966
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 5560
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 8:00:37 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41257
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Everything sucks. Everyone is a bum.

Once the SB ends you get that void you have to deal with. I loath this SB matchup so the void starts now. With some stank on it. Some stanky ass void.

_____________________________

They’re all bums
Post #: 5561
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 8:35:02 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9671
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 5562
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 8:52:48 AM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20342
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Everything sucks. Everyone is a bum.

Once the SB ends you get that void you have to deal with. I loath this SB matchup so the void starts now. With some stank on it. Some stanky ass void.

I can't get too worked up about football games anymore as far as letting it ruin my day. I love talking Vikes but even when they lose it doesn't affect my life. It's turning more and more into "entertainment" nowadays. Not true competition. I'd love the Vikes to win it but there will be no dark cloud over me in the offseason. Personally I don't think O'Connell is going to take us to the big games anyways. So I just sit back, see how it plays out, bitch about it to you guys, then move on.
Post #: 5563
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 9:01:49 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 41257
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
All I really know is it can’t be my only thing. Not going forward. How bad I want this seems to make them choke. By my observations anyway.

_____________________________

They’re all bums
Post #: 5564
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 9:55:31 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19595
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
I already 'knew' it but it was totally reinforced yesterday watching both those games. We would stand no chance against Philly (or KC for that matter) with the way we are constructed. Multiple people have mentioned the short passing games and they are right. It eats us up and we don't use it. Both huge negatives.

Also though, those games showed just how soft the middle of our lines are. We would have been destroyed up the middle on both sides of the ball.
Post #: 5565
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 9:57:59 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28152
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

I already 'knew' it but it was totally reinforced yesterday watching both those games. We would stand no chance against Philly (or KC for that matter) with the way we are constructed. Multiple people have mentioned the short passing games and they are right. It eats us up and we don't use it. Both huge negatives.

Also though, those games showed just how soft the middle of our lines are. We would have been destroyed up the middle on both sides of the ball.


Running and short passing games are needed against the very good defenses because that is all they give you.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5566
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 11:31:13 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 78312
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....


Again, the short passes were there all game. KOC can't force Darnold to throw them.

I guess he could call plays that have no one going more than 10 or 15 yards downfield, but that creates other problems...
Post #: 5567
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 12:43:37 PM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45173
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....


Again, the short passes were there all game. KOC can't force Darnold to throw them.

I guess he could call plays that have no one going more than 10 or 15 yards downfield, but that creates other problems...

I remember Tom Brady commenting that Darnold needs to be able to scan the defense and figure out presnap when his 4th option is going to be his first option instead of going through all of his progressions post snap.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 5568
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 12:55:44 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28152
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
Phil Mackey thoughts on backup QB next year.

Let’s say Sam Darnold and Daniel Jones both leave in free agency…

Which of these guys would you want entering Minnesota Vikings QB Rehab School?

Zach Wilson
Justin Fields
Mac Jones
Trey Lance

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5569
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 1:06:59 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19595
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Phil Mackey thoughts on backup QB next year.

Let’s say Sam Darnold and Daniel Jones both leave in free agency…

Which of these guys would you want entering Minnesota Vikings QB Rehab School?

Zach Wilson
Justin Fields
Mac Jones
Trey Lance



I listened to that pod yesterday. Basically they were:

Wilson - if KOC thinks enough of him
Fields - yes
Jones - maybe but kinda 'blah'
Lance - no way
Post #: 5570
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 1:25:44 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12278
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Phil Mackey thoughts on backup QB next year.

Let’s say Sam Darnold and Daniel Jones both leave in free agency…

Which of these guys would you want entering Minnesota Vikings QB Rehab School?

Zach Wilson
Justin Fields
Mac Jones
Trey Lance



I listened to that pod yesterday. Basically they were:

Wilson - if KOC thinks enough of him
Fields - yes
Jones - maybe but kinda 'blah'
Lance - no way

I would like to think that Lance could get "it" because of the big arm and athletic ability.

But, Shanahan couldn't get him to improve and he has a pretty good track record.
Post #: 5571
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 1:27:27 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12278
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Phil Mackey thoughts on backup QB next year.

Let’s say Sam Darnold and Daniel Jones both leave in free agency…

Which of these guys would you want entering Minnesota Vikings QB Rehab School?

Zach Wilson
Justin Fields
Mac Jones
Trey Lance



I listened to that pod yesterday. Basically they were:

Wilson - if KOC thinks enough of him
Fields - yes
Jones - maybe but kinda 'blah'
Lance - no way

Fields is Darnold on steroids when it comes to holding the ball too long.

I think it will be Jones. I guess KOC has a little history with him.
Post #: 5572
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 2:03:24 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5942
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....

Its kind of a perfect storm of an OC that wants to attack downfield first, get his superstar wr targets second, and third, a Lamonica type passer that scans and waits on the deep route first before settling for the middle and scoffing at the short. And fourth, an IOL fiasco that is no accident or injury replacement surprise.

Sure thats a gross oversimplification, but as Levine and others keep pointing out, short options were often available.

Not looking at the short options is not just the QB though. Based on Sam consistently holding on to the ball too long over the course of the season … I do blame KOC for not whispering harder about focusing on different levels, calling more two step drops, etc.

I know its hard to self-critique yourself when you’re rolling to 14-3 but this offense shut down at the end of 2022 also.

We keep getting spanked by teams that are embarrassingly spanked in their next game. That says something about how close we are.
Post #: 5573
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 2:36:58 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 78312
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....

Its kind of a perfect storm of an OC that wants to attack downfield first, get his superstar wr targets second, and third, a Lamonica type passer that scans and waits on the deep route first before settling for the middle and scoffing at the short. And fourth, an IOL fiasco that is no accident or injury replacement surprise.

Sure thats a gross oversimplification, but as Levine and others keep pointing out, short options were often available.

Not looking at the short options is not just the QB though. Based on Sam consistently holding on to the ball too long over the course of the season … I do blame KOC for not whispering harder about focusing on different levels, calling more two step drops, etc.

I know its hard to self-critique yourself when you’re rolling to 14-3 but this offense shut down at the end of 2022 also.

We keep getting spanked by teams that are embarrassingly spanked in their next game. That says something about how close we are.


True.

But its very likely that it's Sam's fatal flaw and the reason such a highly regarded draft pick has struggled so much in his career. Over aggression has always been his biggest red flag. We saw on film, time and time again the last 2 games, where he'd look off the underneath target and hold the ball while looking for a bigger play. And a handful of those underneath throws would've been for easy TDs. But instead turned into sacks or incompletitions.
Post #: 5574
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/27/2025 2:43:43 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20342
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All 4 teams today had really good short passing games.

They perfected it with play design, motions, execution, and all were helped by having QBs that could run.

The Vikings could add beef to the interior OL, add a great RB, but still fall short to any of the teams that played today, because the Vikings are relying too heavily on a deeper passing game (which a lot could still be Darnold, but some of it is KOC).

The Vikings seem to have gotten away from a lot of motion, to simplify things, but it would be good if they could still have some of it in there, while still getting to the line quickly to call the next play.

KC came out hitting those short rhythm passes and made their 1st td look easy. Also, being able to run the ball is a must. I liked how Buf came out in the 2nd half and played bully ball.

Hope O'Connell was taking notes.


this is exactly what the rams did to us in our playoff game...came out with quick, short, easy passes....

whatever o'connell was calling for darnold, it sure as hell wasn't anything like that....

Its kind of a perfect storm of an OC that wants to attack downfield first, get his superstar wr targets second, and third, a Lamonica type passer that scans and waits on the deep route first before settling for the middle and scoffing at the short. And fourth, an IOL fiasco that is no accident or injury replacement surprise.

Sure thats a gross oversimplification, but as Levine and others keep pointing out, short options were often available.

Not looking at the short options is not just the QB though. Based on Sam consistently holding on to the ball too long over the course of the season … I do blame KOC for not whispering harder about focusing on different levels, calling more two step drops, etc.

I know its hard to self-critique yourself when you’re rolling to 14-3 but this offense shut down at the end of 2022 also.

We keep getting spanked by teams that are embarrassingly spanked in their next game. That says something about how close we are.


True.

But its very likely that it's Sam's fatal flaw and the reason such a highly regarded draft pick has struggled so much in his career. Over aggression has always been his biggest red flag. We saw on film, time and time again the last 2 games, where he'd look off the underneath target and hold the ball while looking for a bigger play. And a handful of those underneath throws would've been for easy TDs. But instead turned into sacks or incompletitions.

Bingo! Sometimes you have to just get the offense in a rhythm.
Post #: 5575
Page:   <<   < prev  220 221 222 [223] 224   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  220 221 222 [223] 224   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode