Tom Sykes
Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote:
ORIGINAL: Murph quote:
ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke quote:
ORIGINAL: Chris Olson pretty clear the Darnold signing is for a bridge guy... and I bet they are expecting the 1st rd QB will be starting anyway... or starting after a few games, like Richardson did last year just glad we finally cut ties with Kirk, everything looks rosy because of that albatross being cut free I’m not so sure of that. I don’t think it’s a given they draft a high pick QB. It would certainly be the conventional wisdom that they do. Darnold a bridge to QBOTF. And that may be plan A. But what if things don’t go their way in the draft? You cannot afford to ‘settle’. You need a very strong plan B C and D. Plans that don’t assume you HAVE to draft a QB if you fail to get your guy. KAM is a third year GM whose team regressed last year, and whose drafts have been mostly mediocre. If the Vikings don’t return to the playoffs immediately his job is on very shaky ground. Loading up on blue chip defensive toys for Flores’ defense while saving money with a game manager QB may be a path to sneak back into the playoffs and buy him another year to think about acquiring the QBOF. Imho, There's zero chance Kwesi and KOC put their future in Darnold's hands. We're drafting a QB high THIS year. With the depth of this year's QB class and the need it would be negligence if they didn't address it considering where their picking. I've heard several times that next year's QB class is not as strong – on paper – as this year's class. That's almost meaningless because nobody knows, its just more draftnik quackery. But if the millions I pump into my college scouting and personnel department comes up with that conclusion, I am going to be very aggressive this year. It sure looks like we've been aligning ourselves the last two years to draft somebody significant this year. 1) Chicago Bears (from Carolina) Taking a QB 2) Washington Commanders Taking a QB 3) New England Patriots Taking a QB 4) Arizona Cardinals 5) Los Angeles Chargers 6) New York Giants Wild Card 7) Tennessee Titans 8) Atlanta Falcons 9) Chicago Bears 10) New York Jets Bit of a Wild Card 11) Minnesota Vikings Needs a QB 12) Denver Broncos Needs a QB 13) Las Vegas Raiders 14) New Orleans Saints 15) Indianapolis Colts 16) Seattle Seahawks Needs a QB The Giants are pretty definite IMO. Not sure why the Cards aren't but they should be. Chargers, Titans, Falcons, Bears, Jets – even if they aren't 'needs a QB' they are prime destinations for teams behind us trying to jump up in front of us for a QB. No worries. I'm sure Kwesi and Kevin are giddy about their plan.
|