Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE:The Packers

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE:The Packers Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 8:47:28 PM   
Duane Sampson


Posts: 14200
Status: offline 		Udeze to Appeal Fine Thu Nov 22, 2007 The Star Tribune reports Minnesota Vikings DE Kenechi Udeze plans to appeal the $7,500 fine he received from the NFL for a third-quarter hit on Green Bay Packers QB Brett Favre in the Packers' 34-0 victory over the Vikings on Nov. 11. The fine was for a hit to the quarterback's head. Has any player ever won an appeal like this? Whatever the debate position you take on this, that is one touchy play to lose 7,500 clams on.
Post #: 601
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 8:57:14 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		[quote="#1 Bart Starr fan"][quote="Todd Mallett"]If my team was doing exceedingly well I would let all the other stuff just roll of my back. We're rivals what do you expect?[/quote] I guess I expect football chat, not mud-slinging and name-calling, as well as a certain level of respect, not just for the the opposing fans but for the opposing players, too. But hey, we're all human so that's just the way it is sometimes. Again, I have no animosity for any of you just because you are Viking fans. For all I know, you're all great folks. I just wish we could get along better. Oh well.... :) [/quote] Well #1, I sure do hope you and your Packer buddies continue to post here. I absolutely agree that you as well as everyone here deserves to have their opinions treated with respect. As for mud slinging and name calling. Not sure that I can ditch my new found Favre flop but I have to admit if any of you came in with Viqueens and what not I might not like it much. I guess it depends on the content of the post. Anyway, I like a little friendly/rival banter so if I cross a line let me know and I will try and tone it down.
Post #: 602
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 10:20:35 PM   
#1 Bart Starr fan

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 11/14/2007
Status: offline 		[quote="Todd Mallett"][quote="#1 Bart Starr fan"][quote="Todd Mallett"]If my team was doing exceedingly well I would let all the other stuff just roll of my back. We're rivals what do you expect?[/quote] I guess I expect football chat, not mud-slinging and name-calling, as well as a certain level of respect, not just for the the opposing fans but for the opposing players, too. But hey, we're all human so that's just the way it is sometimes. Again, I have no animosity for any of you just because you are Viking fans. For all I know, you're all great folks. I just wish we could get along better. Oh well.... :) [/quote] Well #1, I sure do hope you and your Packer buddies continue to post here. I absolutely agree that you as well as everyone here deserves to have their opinions treated with respect. As for mud slinging and name calling. Not sure that I can ditch my new found Favre flop but I have to admit if any of you came in with Viqueens and what not I might not like it much. I guess it depends on the content of the post. Anyway, I like a little friendly/rival banter so if I cross a line let me know and I will try and tone it down.[/quote] Well, I will stay here...sure. And I appreciate your candor. No worries. All I was pointing out is that my refusal to participate in, e.g., the continuation of the Harris/Peterson debate only means I don't think it's worthwhile, as far as I'm concerned. But I don't mean to limit or censor anyone else. It's just that there's so much good football stuff to discuss, why bother? Anyway, thanks for the nice reply. I do sincerely appreciate it. Looks like the Pack are going to pull it off after all. Whew. I was worried for a while there. Kitna picked a bad time to have such a lousy game, as have the Lion receivers.
Post #: 603
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 11:11:09 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		Must be nice. 10-1 Favre is playing great. Everything is looking up. I hate it. Still going to talk about the Favre flop and Dirty Harris. Harris made a nice facemask tackle today. That's all I got.
Post #: 604
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 11:40:47 PM   
#1 Bart Starr fan

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 11/14/2007
Status: offline 		Brett: 31 of 41...381 yards...no ints...not too shabby for a 38 year old. Driver: career day: 10 catches for 147...damn! Here comes Dallas...we need KGB and Woodson back, for sure. God, dare we hope????
Post #: 605
RE:The Packers - 11/22/2007 11:46:36 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		Not too shabby. Too bad it was only a "team" record 20 straight completions though. 5 more and it would have been something.
Post #: 606
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 2:35:37 AM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline 		Great game by the Pack. The offense is really clicking right now and it's impressive. Grant has another 100 yard day, the vast majority of it in the 2nd half. The defense was a bit suspect early on and in the 4th Q but they were good enough. Favre is simply playing unbelieveable football right now, here's his last 5 games: @DEN: 21-27 (77.8%) 331 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT @KC: 24-34 (70.6%) 360 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT MIN: 33-46 (71.7%) 351 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT CAR: 22-30 (73.3%) 218 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT @DET: 31-41 (75.6%) 381 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT That's 131-178 (73.6%) 1641 yards, 13 TD, 2 INT. :shock:
Post #: 607
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 2:44:45 AM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline 		[quote="Todd Mallett"] Well #1, I sure do hope you and your Packer buddies continue to post here. I absolutely agree that you as well as everyone here deserves to have their opinions treated with respect. As for mud slinging and name calling. Not sure that I can ditch my new found Favre flop but I have to admit if any of you came in with Viqueens and what not I might not like it much. I guess it depends on the content of the post. Anyway, I like a little friendly/rival banter so if I cross a line let me know and I will try and tone it down.[/quote] Thanks Todd. You're a good egg. When can we expect a new picture for the avatar, or are you waiting a couple more weeks to make it bigger?
Post #: 608
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 3:03:36 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		Do you mean pump a little iron? Or get a bigger tattoo? This is the second time you've mentioned it and I have to admit it's going a little over my head. Are you just razzing me? Or making a suggestion on how I should display it? I'm not offended either way just not sure what your message is.
Post #: 609
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 3:10:50 AM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline 		[quote="Todd Mallett"]Do you mean pump a little iron? Or get a bigger tattoo? This is the second time you've mentioned it and I have to admit it's going a little over my head. Are you just razzing me? Or making a suggestion on how I should display it? I'm not offended either way just not sure what your message is.[/quote] Sorry, I thought you had mentioned at the get-together that you were going to take a clearer picture of the tattoo for your avatar. My razzing was that you had not done so yet as you were going to pump some more iron to make your arm bigger, thus a more impressive picture. Sorry I wasn't more clear. That and a little jealousy as if I posted a pic of my arm, well, the gap in Vince Lombardi's front teeth is bigger.
Post #: 610
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 3:17:03 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		That's right. I do plan on getting it touched up and possibly bordered in gold and yes I do plan on taking a better picture. As for pumping iron - soooo lazy! I guess I should shelf it until a later just not sure what to replace it with. The funny thing is that was the best pic and I thought it was obvious it was an arm band type tattoo. You would laugh if I showed you the ones that didn't make the cut.
Post #: 611
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 6:27:04 AM   
David Moufang

 

Posts: 1177
Joined: 7/29/2007
From: Columbia Crest
Status: offline 		Great game, but also some of THE worst officiating I've ever seen. Some very questionable calls today, like the pass interference towards the end of the game. Favre really turned it around after a shaky start. Big stat for the day: 20 consecutive completions, a team record. That is amazing. Simply amazing.
Post #: 612
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 2:07:54 PM   
John Childress


Posts: 42898
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		GB Dallas is going to be a game worth watching!
Post #: 613
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 3:54:01 PM   
Duane Sampson


Posts: 14200
Status: offline 		Pretty funny that the office Packers fans are already crying that they don't have NFL Network to watch the "big" game. Beap Chastards won't shell out for Directv. I told 'em I'd go to the bar with them so they can watch it. And I'll protect them if anybody starts giving 'em shit for drinkin' pink squirrels. :lol:
Post #: 614
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 4:55:36 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40622
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online 		What I don't understand is why last nights game was not shown on the NFL network here in Canada. Luckily Sports Center had it. NFL N was showing some old clips of a woman's football team. I hope they don't screw around with any more games.
Post #: 615
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 5:38:55 PM   
Duane Sampson


Posts: 14200
Status: offline 		Pay-Per-View everything is coming.
Post #: 616
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 6:01:01 PM   
#1 Bart Starr fan

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 11/14/2007
Status: offline 		[quote="Duane Sampson"]Pretty funny that the office Packers fans are already crying that they don't have NFL Network to watch the "big" game. Beap Chastards won't shell out for Directv. I told 'em I'd go to the bar with them so they can watch it. And I'll protect them if anybody starts giving 'em shit for drinkin' pink squirrels. :lol:[/quote] For me, it's not economics, it's that I have Comcast cable. I have considered getting satellite, but enough people tell me stories of interruption of service due to weather conditions that I'm reluctant. If anyone here who has satellite can give me some opinions on this subject, I'd love to hear from them. Again, we'd prefer to not give our business to Comcast. My BASIC cable bill (no premium channels, just the standard package with stuff like ESPN, HGTV, Food, FX, USA, MSNBC, TMC...etc) costs me more than 50 bucks a month. But I don't want to switch and right in the middle of a program, have a thunderstorm or snowstorm knock me out for a few hours. Thanks in advance for any ideas you all care to express.
Post #: 617
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 6:20:28 PM   
Duane Sampson


Posts: 14200
Status: offline 		I have Directv so I can get the NFL Ticket to watch the Vikings. I get NFL Netwok with the basic package. I usually only watch the Vikings so for me, PPV would be perfect. I'm stuck with broadcast Bears or Packers for the last 40 years, so Directv was awesome. I'm not just a little tickled that some of the lamers I know are whining about the Packer/Dallas game. I usually watch Thursday and Monday games at the bar anyhow. But these guys aren't "bar" patrons. Too bad for them. I used to drive up to 60 miles just to pick up the Vikings on a weak am band and listen to the game fade in and out. These guys can kiss the royal Canadian as far as I'm concerned. My satellite reception rarely goes out due to weather. No more than cable did when I was a lamer. Don't let that stop you.
Post #: 618
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 6:33:00 PM   
Russell Timmons


Posts: 865
Joined: 8/19/2007
From: Guanajuato City, Mexico
Status: offline 		From the Tennessean: Williams was on the practice field Thursday after agreeing to contract terms, but worked only in scout team drills. He won't play in Sunday's game at Cincinnati and the Titans weren't making any promises about how quickly he might be in uniform on Sundays. The Titans listed the 6-foot-5 Williams at 230 pounds, but he looked a lot heavier than that on Thursday. Coach Jeff Fisher admitted it might take some time for Williams to learn the offense and work himself into better shape. The Tennessean I guess my question is, does this guy even have any desire to play? He's out of job, and gets even further our of condition... :shrug:
Post #: 619
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 7:03:58 PM   
Phil

 

Posts: 188
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: packerland
Status: offline 		I have directv and the only time my satellite went out due to weather was when we had some really heavy, wet snow...I just went outside and pushed the snow off of the dish and I was back in business. Again, don't let fears of 'weather' stop you.
Post #: 620
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 7:14:38 PM   
Duane Sampson


Posts: 14200
Status: offline 		[quote="Russell Timmons"] The Titans listed the 6-foot-5 Williams at 230 pounds, but he looked a lot heavier than that on Thursday. [/quote] That's his weight on the moon. :lol:
Post #: 621
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 7:17:18 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: online 		:D :D
Post #: 622
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 7:33:52 PM   
John Childress


Posts: 42898
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		If a guy is 23 years old and can't stay in shape...
Post #: 623
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 8:58:13 PM   
David Moufang

 

Posts: 1177
Joined: 7/29/2007
From: Columbia Crest
Status: offline 		[quote="Duane Sampson"]Pay-Per-View everything is coming.[/quote] Unfortunately, I think you're right. The NFL has always exerted tight control over television broadcasts, and in my opinion it's gotten tighter in recent years. I don't know when they instituted this system where only one network gets both the early and late games. It's a serious nuisance though. Seems like there have been more pay-only games since last year. Monday Night Football moved to cable TV. Many people are still bitter about that. I tell them that NBC picked up the Sunday night game, but that doesn't seem to be any consolation. Then we got this idiotic NFL Network. I missed last year's Green Bay/Minnesota game at Lambeau because of it. It was a lousy game, but I still wanted to see it. And now I'll probably miss the Dallas game unless I want to go sit in a bar all night.
Post #: 624
RE:The Packers - 11/23/2007 9:05:05 PM   
El Duderino


Posts: 6833
Joined: 7/27/2007
From: If you're not into the whole brevity thing ...
Status: offline 		[quote="Russell Timmons"]From the Tennessean: Williams was on the practice field Thursday after agreeing to contract terms, but worked only in scout team drills. He won't play in Sunday's game at Cincinnati and the Titans weren't making any promises about how quickly he might be in uniform on Sundays. The Titans listed the 6-foot-5 Williams at 230 pounds, but he looked a lot heavier than that on Thursday. Coach Jeff Fisher admitted it might take some time for Williams to learn the offense and work himself into better shape. The Tennessean I guess my question is, does this guy even have any desire to play? He's out of job, and gets even further our of condition... :shrug:[/quote] He had to pay the bills somehow - maybe the only job he could find was as a boat anchor. No, wait - fat floats. Tugboat, perhaps? Ornamental doorstop? Steam roller? Now I'm just being mean. :oops:
Post #: 625
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE:The Packers Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode