Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: The Packers

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE: The Packers Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 6:47:00 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
Why would the NFL give the thumbs up to a player taking his helmet off DURING a play? The helmet is there for safety, and especially now with the emphasis on protecting against head injuries, I would assume that would be a huge infraction. Something sounds very fishy to me.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2076
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 7:15:49 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I thought it was that if it got knocked off during a play you wouldn't get penalized.

IF you take it off, I assume that is a penalty.
Post #: 2077
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 7:22:34 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
"According to NFL helmet rules, a player who illegally uses the top of his helmet as a weapon, removes his helmet on the field of play (except when injured) or attacks the head of the quarterback will be hit with a 15-yard penalty. " eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/facts_4796971_nfl-helmet-rules.html#ixzz13hbwu0mp

I think Craig IS confused on this, and is extending the idea that if a helmet accidently comes off during a play, or a player takes it off because he is hurt, to meaning it can be taken off at any time. But Matthews took his helmet off AFTER a play, as they are lining up for the next play, and I think that should be a penalty. Maybe I'm confused on this ?

< Message edited by marty -- 10/28/2010 7:24:04 PM >
Post #: 2078
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 7:29:33 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
15 Yards - Chop block. Clipping below the waist. Fair catch interference. Illegal crackback block by offense. Piling on. Roughing the kicker. Roughing the passer. Twisting, turning, or pulling an opponent by the facemask. Unnecessary roughness. Unsportsmanlike conduct.
Delay of game at start of either half. Illegal low block. A tackler using his helmet to butt, spear, or ram an opponent. Any player who uses the top of his helmet unnecessarily.
A punter, placekicker, or holder who simulates being roughed by a defensive player. Leaping. Leverage. Any player who removes his helmet after a play while on the field.

http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/penaltysummaries
Post #: 2079
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 7:31:07 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I'm sorry Craig, I didn't read the fine print:

Any player (except Clay Matthews) who removes his helmet after a play while on the field.

Post #: 2080
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 7:39:43 PM   
John Childress


Posts: 42898
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
Forget the helmet off

If the Vikings QB would just stop throwing the ball to his Packer buddies we would have won the game

_____________________________

No more acceptance of mediocrity!!!! EVER!
Post #: 2081
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 8:07:45 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cheesehead Craig

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty
It was legitimate, but before that, they SHOULD have flagged Matthews for taking his helmet off on the field of play.


Actually, I'd like to address this seeing how it's gotten a lot of attention here. It's only a penalty to remove your helmet in celebration of a play or in a confrontation with a game offical or another player. During the play it's allowed if they are in the process of the play. It's stupid to do, but in the context that Clay did it. It's not a penalty. This is per Mike Pereira, the former offical and current ref for FOX.


Per Mike Pereira? I don't see any quote marks around his words.
Post #: 2082
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 8:33:22 PM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cheesehead Craig

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty
It was legitimate, but before that, they SHOULD have flagged Matthews for taking his helmet off on the field of play.


Actually, I'd like to address this seeing how it's gotten a lot of attention here. It's only a penalty to remove your helmet in celebration of a play or in a confrontation with a game offical or another player. During the play it's allowed if they are in the process of the play. It's stupid to do, but in the context that Clay did it. It's not a penalty. This is per Mike Pereira, the former offical and current ref for FOX.


Per Mike Pereira? I don't see any quote marks around his words.

My apologies, here's the link:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/Mike-Pereira-October-26-mailbag-102610

So you see marty, I'm not confused at all; and no he didn't take it off after the play, he was on the back side of it and was running after Favre. The play was not over at all, in fact that was the 2nd and 30 play that was a short pass that Peterson took for about 20. Go ahead and look at NFL.com under the game highlight video, it's around the 6:05 mark or so. As for your 2nd link, it's irrellevant as he didn't take it off after the play was over, it was off during the play. Nothing is fishy at all. It was stupid, but not illegal.


< Message edited by Cheesehead Craig -- 10/28/2010 8:40:26 PM >
Post #: 2083
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 8:50:30 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
I think the discrepancy in the description comes from the fact that he took his helmet off TWICE. Once after a play when he needed to rearrange his hair, and once while he was running during a play. The one during a play absolutely should have been a penalty.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2084
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 8:52:28 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
If the helmet is pushed up a bit and blocking your vision - then pull it back down rather than push it all the way off.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2085
RE: The Packers - 10/28/2010 11:20:34 PM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I think the discrepancy in the description comes from the fact that he took his helmet off TWICE. Once after a play when he needed to rearrange his hair, and once while he was running during a play. The one during a play absolutely should have been a penalty.

Nope. It's not a penalty. He didn't take it off to confront an official or another player nor was it done in a celebratory manner. Those are the facts. Wishing it to be a penalty because he's a Packer doesn't help your arguement.
Post #: 2086
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 1:15:03 AM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
All unnecessary roughness violations result in a 15-yard penalty.

HELMET REMOVAL

If a ball carrier's helmet comes off during a play, the ball will immediately be blown dead. "We watched some tape where players are running in the field of play without helmets," says [Atlanta Falcons President and Co-Chairman of the NFL Competition Committee Rich] McKay. "In our mind that is not a safe situation."


http://www.ihavenet.com/NFL/NFL-2010-New-Rules-for-NFL-2010-Season.html

It's interesting that under THAT mindset, they go to Periera's claim that as long it's not done to confront an official or another player, then it's o.k. I can't seem to find Periera's claim anywhere in the rules posted online, and wonder if that is just HIS interpretation as a former official that is perhaps relying on the OLD rules from when he was still an official ?

So THIS:

15 yard penalty

"According to NFL helmet rules, a player who illegally uses the top of his helmet as a weapon, removes his helmet on the field of play (except when injured) or attacks the head of the quarterback will be hit with a 15-yard penalty. " eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/facts_4796971_nfl-helmet-rules.html#ixzz13hbwu0mp

should be amended to THIS ? "

15 yard penalty

.... removes his helmet on the field of play (except when injured, or when he feels he can't see quite right if he adjusts it, or for whatever reason, as long as he is not confronting an official or another player)

Lynn

I ALSO mistakenly thought it was 2 separate plays where Matthews removed his helmet. Looking at the video, it came off on that one play, it's just that Matthews didn't immediately put it back on. He carried the helmet around for some time, adjusted his hair, and did whatever he felt, apparently knowing he wouldn't get penalized for having a helmet off because he didn't remove it after the play was over as it was ALREADY off.

So IF Matthews had put the helmet back on, and THEN removed it again, it would have been a penalty. It is the ACT of removing it that breaks the rules, NOT having it off for some time.

So as long as you don't confront an official or another player, you can remove your helmet right before a play ends, and can keep it off (without facing penalty) until the next play begins.

I think I've got that right. That statement IS correct right Craig ? I think I now fully understand the rule on this. So an entire team, could simultaneously take their helmets off on the field just before a play is whistled dead (as long as they aren't confronting an official or an opposing player), and then keep their helmets off (WITHOUT facing a penalty) until the next play begins ?

< Message edited by marty -- 10/29/2010 1:26:58 AM >
Post #: 2087
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 8:25:24 AM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cheesehead Craig

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I think the discrepancy in the description comes from the fact that he took his helmet off TWICE. Once after a play when he needed to rearrange his hair, and once while he was running during a play. The one during a play absolutely should have been a penalty.

Nope. It's not a penalty. He didn't take it off to confront an official or another player nor was it done in a celebratory manner. Those are the facts. Wishing it to be a penalty because he's a Packer doesn't help your arguement.


I said it SHOULD have been a penalty. There is no way the league should allow someone to play without a helmet.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2088
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 8:31:08 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39281
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cheesehead Craig

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynn G.

I think the discrepancy in the description comes from the fact that he took his helmet off TWICE. Once after a play when he needed to rearrange his hair, and once while he was running during a play. The one during a play absolutely should have been a penalty.

Nope. It's not a penalty. He didn't take it off to confront an official or another player nor was it done in a celebratory manner. Those are the facts. Wishing it to be a penalty because he's a Packer doesn't help your arguement.


I said it SHOULD have been a penalty. There is no way the league should allow someone to play without a helmet.


Exactly.  It's required equipment to play.  What makes him think he can chuck it off intentionally durning a play?

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 2089
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 9:06:06 AM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline
Maybe Clay Matthews is so tough and so old school that he feels he doesn't need one.
Post #: 2090
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 9:06:52 AM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
He does look a little like Chuck Norris.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2091
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 9:07:30 AM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
... with a wet wig.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2092
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 1:14:53 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39281
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
He looks like a dork with that hair.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 2093
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 1:31:45 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33037
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline
When he was talking to Andrea Kremer after the game, he kept having to lean down to hear her (she's only about 5 feet tall), and each time his greasy, sweaty hair would swoop into her face. He spent more time trying to pull his hair back behind his ear than he did answering questions. Ick.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 2094
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 3:57:41 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

He looks like a dork with that hair.


He's got Na'vian facial features.
Post #: 2095
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 3:58:30 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cheesehead Craig

Maybe Clay Matthews is so tough and so old school that he feels he doesn't need one.


A brain?
Post #: 2096
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 4:03:55 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

All unnecessary roughness violations result in a 15-yard penalty.

HELMET REMOVAL

If a ball carrier's helmet comes off during a play, the ball will immediately be blown dead. "We watched some tape where players are running in the field of play without helmets," says [Atlanta Falcons President and Co-Chairman of the NFL Competition Committee Rich] McKay. "In our mind that is not a safe situation."


http://www.ihavenet.com/NFL/NFL-2010-New-Rules-for-NFL-2010-Season.html

It's interesting that under THAT mindset, they go to Periera's claim that as long it's not done to confront an official or another player, then it's o.k. I can't seem to find Periera's claim anywhere in the rules posted online, and wonder if that is just HIS interpretation as a former official that is perhaps relying on the OLD rules from when he was still an official ?

So THIS:

15 yard penalty

"According to NFL helmet rules, a player who illegally uses the top of his helmet as a weapon, removes his helmet on the field of play (except when injured) or attacks the head of the quarterback will be hit with a 15-yard penalty. " eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/facts_4796971_nfl-helmet-rules.html#ixzz13hbwu0mp

should be amended to THIS ? "

15 yard penalty

.... removes his helmet on the field of play (except when injured, or when he feels he can't see quite right if he adjusts it, or for whatever reason, as long as he is not confronting an official or another player)

Lynn

I ALSO mistakenly thought it was 2 separate plays where Matthews removed his helmet. Looking at the video, it came off on that one play, it's just that Matthews didn't immediately put it back on. He carried the helmet around for some time, adjusted his hair, and did whatever he felt, apparently knowing he wouldn't get penalized for having a helmet off because he didn't remove it after the play was over as it was ALREADY off.

So IF Matthews had put the helmet back on, and THEN removed it again, it would have been a penalty. It is the ACT of removing it that breaks the rules, NOT having it off for some time.

So as long as you don't confront an official or another player, you can remove your helmet right before a play ends, and can keep it off (without facing penalty) until the next play begins.

I think I've got that right. That statement IS correct right Craig ? I think I now fully understand the rule on this. So an entire team, could simultaneously take their helmets off on the field just before a play is whistled dead (as long as they aren't confronting an official or an opposing player), and then keep their helmets off (WITHOUT facing a penalty) until the next play begins ?


Is it actually a requirement to play with a helmet? If so, is there any minimum standards that apply to the construction of a "helmet"? Could I wear some formed aluminum foil on my head, and call it a helmet?
Post #: 2097
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 4:48:11 PM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline
The jealousy of not having Matthews on your team is obvious.
Post #: 2098
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 5:59:00 PM   
marty


Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
So as long as you don't confront an official or another player, you can remove your helmet right before a play ends, and can keep it off (without facing penalty) until the next play begins.

I think I now fully understand the rule on this. So an entire team, could simultaneously take their helmets off on the field just before a play is whistled dead (as long as they aren't confronting an official or an opposing player), and then keep their helmets off (WITHOUT facing a penalty) until the next play begins ?

I don't know why they would do this, but am I correct on this Craig ?
Post #: 2099
RE: The Packers - 10/29/2010 7:06:42 PM   
Cheesehead Craig


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline
Go email Mike Periera, marty. I'm not playing that game.
Post #: 2100
Page:   <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE: The Packers Page: <<   < prev  82 83 [84] 85 86   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode