bohumm -> RE: General Vikes Talk (1/30/2019 10:17:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: bohumm quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes One OG off the FA market ... Ian Rapoport Verified account @RapSheet 4h4 hours ago ' The #Colts signed guard Mark Glowinski to a contract extension, they announced. Source said it’s a three-year deal worth $18M with a signing bonus of $4.2M. They lock him up before free agency. Before free agency? Gasp. Wonder what the 'waiting until the draft is folly' crowd is going to do? More the goalposts I guess. Keep saying we have to acquire at least two interior linemen who can credibly start. Sign 'em or trade for 'em, we can't end up coming up short in the draft------again. We have two or three holes that have to be filled. Wow, right on cue! Still wondering what "credibly start" means. Sounds to me like a CYA term. I don't feel any need to cover my ass. It's my opinion that waiting until the draft---again---to fill the gaping holes in our line is folly, as proven last year. "Credibly start" is easy to understand if you really want to, but my guess is you'd rather continue bleating. Does "viable starter" work for you? And if we don't get two viable Day 1 starters in the draft (and roll the dice that Elflein or Easton will be viable even though they weren't this year) and we go into the season with holes in our interior O-line? That's fine with you? LMAO! You simply traded two "credible" starters for two "viable" starters! As I said JC, what happens when reality hits your demand? Rationale people would suggest MAYBE we could get one solid starter in free agency. But not you. You say we need "AT LEAST two credible" err... (move the goalposts as far as numbers) "two viable" starters, or else we screwed up. Is that about right JC? And please, stop looking up synonyms to change your intent. WTF with the JC BS? I'm only offering synonyms---which I didn't have to look up---because you're too fukking obtuse to understand that credible means someone who can legitimately hold the spot but is not necessarily high quality. In other words, don't suck. I never said they needed any stars, only people who can credibly man the spot. Since you were being such a dick, I offered viable to maybe help you understand. But you think we'll find two viable Day 1 starters in the draft, so really no explanation is going to help you. But stick with your little shtick, be an intentionally (I hope) obtuse assshole, and enjoy your little princess status.
|
|
|
|