RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message


David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:23:56 AM)

Career TD/INT ratio leaders. Remember INTs have been trending down dramatically over the years.

1. Mahomes 4.75
2. Aaron Rodgers 4.63
3. Russell Wilson 3.30
4. Tom Brady 3.04

7. Colin Kaepernick 2.40
8. Derek Carr 2.39

10. Kirk Cousins 2.26

13. Steve Young 2.17
14. Peyton Manning 2.15

20. Rapeyburger 1.97
21. Joe Montana 1.96

35. Dan Marino 1.67

44. Brett Favre 1.51




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:32:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:35:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.

Yes you shared your link and I shared my statistically based rebuttal to your link. Nothing delusional whatsoever. Note that DF just shared how Cousins has the 10th best TD to INT rating of all time. I would say that is indicative of a QB that takes very good care of the ball. Next question.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:39:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.

Yes you shared your link and I shared my statistically based rebuttal to your link. Nothing delusional whatsoever. Note that DF just shared how Cousins has the 10th best TD to INT rating of all time. I would say that is indicative of a QB that takes very good care of the ball. Next question.


Well the fumble rankings aren't going to be very pretty and we are talking about total turnovers.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:54:39 AM)

I'm unable to pull a fumbles/game started stat list. I can say this - KC is near the top of the list in total fumbles for every season he was a regular starter from 2015 to present. Common names near him in the rankings are Jameis Winston, Russell Wilson, Daniel Jones, Derek Carr, and Carson Wentz.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 11:56:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.

Yes you shared your link and I shared my statistically based rebuttal to your link. Nothing delusional whatsoever. Note that DF just shared how Cousins has the 10th best TD to INT rating of all time. I would say that is indicative of a QB that takes very good care of the ball. Next question.


Well the fumble rankings aren't going to be very pretty and we are talking about total turnovers.

Bingo

TD/Int ratio is not revelant to how many TO's committed.

It might help justify in giving said qb more rope thinking TO's can be coached out of him. But that isn't the argument.

Let's say a RB scored 25 td's but fumbled 25 times. just because he was productive it doesn't mean he took good care of the football.




Todd M -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 12:47:12 PM)

Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

****


I remember mine and I was dropped a lot.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 1:30:19 PM)

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/5/27/22457454/sounds-like-jarius-wright-wants-come-back-minnesota-vikings

I certainly think he would be a better option than Bebe or Bisi




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 1:31:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.

Yes you shared your link and I shared my statistically based rebuttal to your link. Nothing delusional whatsoever. Note that DF just shared how Cousins has the 10th best TD to INT rating of all time. I would say that is indicative of a QB that takes very good care of the ball. Next question.


Well the fumble rankings aren't going to be very pretty and we are talking about total turnovers.

Bingo

TD/Int ratio is not revelant to how many TO's committed.

It might help justify in giving said qb more rope thinking TO's can be coached out of him. But that isn't the argument.

Let's say a RB scored 25 td's but fumbled 25 times. just because he was productive it doesn't mean he took good care of the football.


Good job schooling KGBum. Although one has to be pretty obtuse to argue about turnovers and not include fumbles. He was stuck on his narrative that Cousins takes "very good" care of the football and has no wiggle room.

But he'll conjure up something to move the goalposts.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 1:32:12 PM)

Bill Barnwell has a list of 15 moves that he believes make sense between now and the start of the 2021 NFL season. One of those moves involves the Vikings signing former Bengals’ defensive tackle Geno Atkins to a one-year, $3.5 million contract. Here’s his commentary on the move:

Atkins’ breakout years came when Mike Zimmer was the defensive coordinator in Cincinnati, and the Vikings head coach could use some pass-rushing help in Minnesota. Atkins was anonymous last year as the Bengals reduced his role in the lineup, but the 33-year-old is only two seasons removed from a 10-sack campaign. Atkins would slot in as an interior rusher on passing downs as part of a rotation with run-stuffer Michael Pierce.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 2:22:43 PM)

There is evidence that the Vikes tried to move up in the draft to #8.

https://twitter.com/nacholeber/status/1398300613172072452




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 3:39:50 PM)

IG: JosinaAnderson
@JosinaAnderson
·
5h
Team source on talk surrounding Danielle Hunter's contract, who's absent from voluntary OTAs: "It was a great deal when he signed it. A 3rd-round pick that had only gone to one Pro Bowl..All I'll ask is..if u were coming off ur 1st year as a starter wd u hv turned (5/$72M) down?"




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 4:22:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/5/27/22457454/sounds-like-jarius-wright-wants-come-back-minnesota-vikings

I certainly think he would be a better option than Bebe or Bisi

If he is, its barely. To me it just seems like more of the same.

in 2020, Beebe had 30 targets, Bisi 14

Wright had more RECs / playing time / targets in CAR in 2018-2019 than either but he was cut and didn't even play last year.

why bother? beebee bisi wright would be three #5 type wrs hogging the 3-4-5 spots.

I'd rather give the 20-30 targets that Wright would get to ISM, Proehl or the Whopper ...

or sign an upgrade like Westbrook to be a decent #3 getting the bulk of the #3 targets.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 4:40:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/5/27/22457454/sounds-like-jarius-wright-wants-come-back-minnesota-vikings

I certainly think he would be a better option than Bebe or Bisi

If he is, its barely. To me it just seems like more of the same.

in 2020, Beebe had 30 targets, Bisi 14

Wright had more RECs / playing time / targets in CAR in 2018-2019 than either but he was cut and didn't even play last year.

why bother? beebee bisi wright would be three #5 type wrs hogging the 3-4-5 spots.

I'd rather give the 20-30 targets that Wright would get to ISM, Proehl or the Whopper ...

or sign an upgrade like Westbrook to be a decent #3 getting the bulk of the #3 targets.

ISM could be KJ Osborn II far as you or I know. Not saying Wright is all that and probably not even worth vet minimum. Just putting it out there for discussion.




Todd M -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 4:53:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

There is evidence that the Vikes tried to move up in the draft to #8.

https://twitter.com/nacholeber/status/1398300613172072452



They didn't try very hard. That's well short on points.




thebigo -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 5:50:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

I love it. You never know what stupid variants will spring from a stupid argument.

[sm=popcorn.gif]


You must be pretty close to [sm=vomit.gif]




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 6:13:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

There are plenty of reasons why Cousins isn't a good qb.

-Doesn't take care of the football
-Holds the ball too long
-Poor pocket presence
-Abysmal in the last 2min of the first half and end of games (2min drill)
-Primetime record 7-16
-A putrid 4-24 against teams with a winning record

Whenever anyone describes Cousin there is always the caveat "For Kirk to be effective everything needs to be on schedule around him"

Does a good job taking care of the football.
Has the courage to hold the ball long enough to make the play.
Good pocket presence
Just fine in 2 minute drill.
Who gives a F about Prime time. Just a game no different than any other.
Teams win or lose. Not the QB.

I swear to God ... you care less about accuracy than anyone else on this board.

My statement was fully accurate. Of course you will say that's inaccurate.

No just a bit misleading, as you meant it

Now I'm confused. My take on Kirk is that he's a very good QB and talented at about every facet of playing the position.


I actually thought I was replying to David F. It had all the earmarks. Still your post was a bit misleading, although possibly not intentionally.

I'm trying to figure out the part that could have been misleading. Just my opinion backed up with a lot of statistical facts.

Where are these statistical facts?

You say Cousins takes good care of the football when he was tied for second with the most turnovers in the league last season. Maybe check some facts before you type next time.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/most-turnovers-by-a-qb-in-the-2020-nfl-season

Cousins has had one of the better TD to INT ratings in the league throughout his career. I believe that adjusted INT rate chart shared here had him in the top 6 tied with Brady. Consider how horrible the OL play was and how much worse Cousins TOs should have been. Next question.

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

Nice ad hominem argument there Bill. How about replacing it with a logical one. As for being dropped on my head as a baby I really doubt I would remember it. Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

The reason I asked is because I included a link that referenced Cousins as having the 2nd most TO's in the league last season. You clearly stated that he takes good care of the football which is simply a delusional statement that could only be made by someone that does not have a firm grip on all his faculties.

For further reference Cousins had one less TO than Carson Wentz whom got rode out of town.

Yes you shared your link and I shared my statistically based rebuttal to your link. Nothing delusional whatsoever. Note that DF just shared how Cousins has the 10th best TD to INT rating of all time. I would say that is indicative of a QB that takes very good care of the ball. Next question.


Well the fumble rankings aren't going to be very pretty and we are talking about total turnovers.

Bingo

TD/Int ratio is not revelant to how many TO's committed.

It might help justify in giving said qb more rope thinking TO's can be coached out of him. But that isn't the argument.

Let's say a RB scored 25 td's but fumbled 25 times. just because he was productive it doesn't mean he took good care of the football.

To give you a useful analogy. The best players in the NBA are the ones with the most TOs. Go check the stats if you don't believe me. It's a biproduct of making plays. To get an idea of how well they take care of the ball look at their Assist/TO rate. So to declare taking care of the football we need perspective such as TD/INT rate. I'm ok if you want to look at TDs/TO rate to include fumbles. I'm pretty confident that Kirk will still score pretty well.
His fumbles are also a product of the horrible line play. O-75 Bingo.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 6:21:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/5/27/22457454/sounds-like-jarius-wright-wants-come-back-minnesota-vikings

I certainly think he would be a better option than Bebe or Bisi

[:D]




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 6:22:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Do you remember the entirety of your baby time and know whether or not you were dropped on your head?

****


I remember mine and I was dropped a lot.

[&:]




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/28/2021 6:23:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

There is evidence that the Vikes tried to move up in the draft to #8.

https://twitter.com/nacholeber/status/1398300613172072452

Yeah and I think that was a pretty big professional gaffe by the Panthers. Teams are not supposed to divulge that stuff. What goes around will most likely come around to them.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/29/2021 10:47:29 AM)

One indisputable stat is Kurt Cousins is a perennial top 10 fumbling QB: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles?season_id=18




Murph -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/29/2021 10:59:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

One indisputable stat is Kurt Cousins is a perennial top 10 fumbling QB: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles?season_id=18


His lack of pocket presence is what keeps him from being a top 10 QB

Way too many unforced sacks and fumbles. Drive killers.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/29/2021 3:52:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

One indisputable stat is Kurt Cousins is a perennial top 10 fumbling QB: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles?season_id=18


His lack of pocket presence is what keeps him from being a top 10 QB

Way too many unforced sacks and fumbles. Drive killers.

Yep. Such drive killers that we finished 4th in the NFL in offense. Just imagine if the OL wasn't one of the worst in the league.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/29/2021 6:35:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

One indisputable stat is Kurt Cousins is a perennial top 10 fumbling QB: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles?season_id=18


His lack of pocket presence is what keeps him from being a top 10 QB

Way too many unforced sacks and fumbles. Drive killers.

Yep. Such drive killers that we finished 4th in the NFL in offense. Just imagine if the OL wasn't one of the worst in the league.

Fourth in Yards. Big deal.

5th in rushing yards, 14th in receiving yards. Combined for 4th in total yds.

You can have a boatload of yards but if that doesn't convert into scoring ...

Percentage of Drives ending in a score: 39.8 (ranked 18) ...
Points scored by team: 430 (ranked 11th )
There are so many variables that are more important than just plain ol' yards.

As far as KC taking care of the football ...

2020 INTs: 13 – Tied for 3rd (2 more INTs and KC would have tied the league leader)
2020 Fumbles: 9 – Tied for 3rd (2 more fumbles and KC would have tied the league leader)

As far as blaming everything on the OL ... its a feeble excuse.

According to PFF, the worst performing OLs last year were the Chargers (rookie Hebert 10INTs/4Fs in 15 Games ), Giants (Daniel Jones 10INTs/3Fs in 14 games [back-up Colt Mcoy had 1 INT]), Bengals (rookie Burrow had 5INTs in 10 games (backup Allen 4 INTS in 5 games) ...

Not only does KC NOT take care of the ball, he's a consistent TO machine over the course of his career.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (5/29/2021 7:29:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

One indisputable stat is Kurt Cousins is a perennial top 10 fumbling QB: https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/player-stat/fumbles?season_id=18


His lack of pocket presence is what keeps him from being a top 10 QB

Way too many unforced sacks and fumbles. Drive killers.

Yep. Such drive killers that we finished 4th in the NFL in offense. Just imagine if the OL wasn't one of the worst in the league.

Fourth in Yards. Big deal.

5th in rushing yards, 14th in receiving yards. Combined for 4th in total yds.

You can have a boatload of yards but if that doesn't convert into scoring ...

Percentage of Drives ending in a score: 39.8 (ranked 18) ...
Points scored by team: 430 (ranked 11th )
There are so many variables that are more important than just plain ol' yards.

As far as KC taking care of the football ...

2020 INTs: 13 – Tied for 3rd (2 more INTs and KC would have tied the league leader)
2020 Fumbles: 9 – Tied for 3rd (2 more fumbles and KC would have tied the league leader)

As far as blaming everything on the OL ... its a feeble excuse.

According to PFF, the worst performing OLs last year were the Chargers (rookie Hebert 10INTs/4Fs in 15 Games ), Giants (Daniel Jones 10INTs/3Fs in 14 games [back-up Colt Mcoy had 1 INT]), Bengals (rookie Burrow had 5INTs in 10 games (backup Allen 4 INTS in 5 games) ...

Not only does KC NOT take care of the ball, he's a consistent TO machine over the course of his career.

Who's top 10 all time in TD/INT ratio. Does anybody know how to get the TD/TO ratio? Was it 9 fumbles lost or 9 total with X lost. Interesting that it's almost impossible to find TD/TO ratio yet "Vikings" fans are scrutinizing that in an attempt to discredit KC. I'm also not the one blaming everything on the O Line. Every poster on this message board that I'm aware of considers our O Line play to be horrible.

I am absolutely fine with Kirk as our QB. If Mond is ready for 2023 I'm fine with that too.




Page: <<   < prev  86 87 [88] 89 90   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode