RE: General Vikes Talk

RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk

Message

Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 3:53:26 PM)
I saw on Twitter today the new LB Hicks unloaded on the RB for GB almost the same way as ZED....

kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 5:49:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: David F. quote: ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Ricky J Why not here? It's ok to talk about bands, right? What percent of the people who used to post here regularly seven years ago post here today. Why is that? The point of the entire blow up tonight was centered around, for me, treating other people like shit who post here. * Boston Globe, 1/6/2002, Baltimore, A Pale Blue Dot - that's what I think about religion, but I respect people who have faith and enjoy going to church - and in my opinion, common decency requires There ya go, Dan - carry on I suspect they have either matured beyond my adolescent fixation on this team or have more interesting lives than I do. I think some have moved onto sites that keep it 99% football. At least that is what I have seen. I've never found a site that keeps it even 75% football. Most I've visited are much more vulgar and mean-spirited than talkvikes. My theory is that the clashes were more about posters' desire to control the narrative than the actual content of any given argument. The attempts to control naturally spark the rebellious nature of those who don't stand for that. I think there was a core group that viewed talkvikes as "theirs" and weren't flexible enough to enjoy new users and their opinions and styles. [sm=dillydilly.jpg][sm=ditto.gif]

kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 5:53:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bohumm quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes Its not enough to win a game … this needs to be a good team at a minimum and compete for a championship at the median. Until I know that, I will continue being a brooding short-tempered nasty jerk. I'd say it's more that they need to compete for a playoff spot at a minimum, per the Wilfs mandate, and be pointed in the right direction with a plan to get there. That said, I think (don't know) that they are already good, so now I'm looking forward to the improvement I anticipate as the year proceeds. [sm=dillydilly.jpg][sm=ditto.gif]

kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 5:55:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: drviking Vikings WIN! Cheese Lose Cowpukes lose! the holy triumvirate! and I won the football pool....Its been a LONG time since I had a better football weekend. Congratz. Same for me with the first experience of online wagering.

Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 6:42:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bohumm quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes Its not enough to win a game … this needs to be a good team at a minimum and compete for a championship at the median. Until I know that, I will continue being a brooding short-tempered nasty jerk. I'd say it's more that they need to compete for a playoff spot at a minimum, per the Wilfs mandate, and be pointed in the right direction with a plan to get there. That said, I think (don't know) that they are already good, so now I'm looking forward to the improvement I anticipate as the year proceeds. Semantics... My post was an over-dramatic response to not being upbeat after game one. Even though game one was a blast, its one game. I'm eagerly looking forward to seeing how this unfolds.

bongbong -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 8:21:25 PM)
I'm terrible at this sort of thing, but I'll offer the Vikes need an early lead. (Genius, i know.) Life's too short to watch Iggles football, but i doubt their ipo/ glorified college offence can play catch- up well in the NFL. Make Jalen throw and it could snowball.

bongbong -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 8:26:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought!

Murph -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 8:46:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way.

Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/15/2022 10:56:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries.

bstinger -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 7:21:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marty I don't dishonor anyone Bill, you're just an a-- towards me. All the Vikings WRs have a J in their name, that is why OBJ would fit right in. It would be nice to replace Bisi. [&o] [sm=anim_wow.gif] How do you spell #19's name? Furthermore doesn't Jalen Reagor pretty much replace Bisi, and he's got the coveted J that you're after. [sm=clown.gif]

bstinger -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 7:41:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss.

Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 8:54:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons.....

Trekgeekscott -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 9:32:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... He would have won MVP one year but THAT was the year Peyton Manning threw 49 TDs

Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 9:35:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span.

Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 9:38:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. No they don't. Besides, it's Mt. Rushmore for a reason. Four players. 4. Quattro.

Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 10:17:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. No they don't. Besides, it's Mt. Rushmore for a reason. Four players. 4. Quattro. I think you got it right Bill. I just loved how Randle would get into the opposing players heads. McDaniel is the right choice imo.

Daniel Lee Young -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 10:32:42 AM)
I think, if I had to sub in anyone, on Vikings Mt. Rushmore, it would be Bud Grant

Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:15:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz.

Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:22:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long.

David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:30:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long. Daunte played five more seasons.

Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:32:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: David F. quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long. Daunte played five more seasons. Man time flies! He must not have played much. I just remember a brief stint with the Raiders and Dolphins.

Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:43:37 PM)
According to pro football reference he played 4 years after Minnesota. His teams records were 3-17 when he played. [:-]

thebigo -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:44:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long. Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury?

Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 12:45:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thebigo quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long. Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury? Many people recover from injuries. He was made by Moss and Carter. He was extremely overrated.

Mark Anderson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/16/2022 1:00:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: thebigo quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: bstinger quote: ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote: ORIGINAL: Murph quote: ORIGINAL: bongbong quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote: ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote: ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen OK, that's weird. Vikings Mt. Rushmore, no ifs, ands, or buts (sorry Joey Browner) and in no order: Randall McDaniel Alan Page Fran Tarkenton Randy Moss Loved Browner and AC! That's why I started loving the purple! Solid Rushmore Bill. I think I may throw in Randle over McDaniel but in no way was he better at his position than crooked stance McDaniel. Just a preference I guess. Yeah Randle is up there. In McDaniel's rookie year he was already 2nd team this or that. I loved watching him abuse Warren Sapp. That is a solid list. Can't really think how I'd change it. Easier than i thought! They were all freaks of nature on the football field in their own way. I think Foreman, Blair, Yary, Doleman, and AP make the list. Jared Allen too. As bad as some years have been. We have had a lot of great/dominate players in our history. Dante and Millard dominance cut short by injuries. Dante was only good because of Moss. Well I went to his first game against the Bears were he had 3 rushing TDs. Moss and CC helped his passing a ton (when younger) but I remember the year Moss was banged up most of the year and Burleson had 10 TDS........Dante was dominate and if he kept himself in better shape and not tore up his knee.... 28 Rushing TDs to go with his 109 passing TDS from his age 23-27 seasons..... Congratulations on the first-ever double cherry picked post! Not only did you cherry pick the timeframe, you cherry picked certain stats within that time frame! You of course failed when supposedly replying to "Dante was only good because of Moss." If you would have manned up, your stats would have included - or focused - on the seven games in 2005, after Moss was traded. Culpepper passing: 6 TDs and 12 Ints; rushing: 1 TD, 5 fumbles. And you would have added 74 picks and 66 fumbles to your cherry picked stats in that cherry-picked time span. Culpepper was already added to the tiny hands rushmore in gackle, north dakota. gzuz. I remember telling everyone that Culpepper would be out of the league soon without Moss. I said 2 years. I don't know how long it actually was but it didn't seem like too long. Did you also predict his massive almost career ending knee injury? Many people recover from injuries. He was made by Moss and Carter. He was extremely overrated. In hindsight, take Kearse at @11 and Kerney @29 and RC or George could lead us to SB.

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode