RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message


Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 1:42:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Power Ranking 9.

GB 4

So a team we smashed and 4 teams with worse records (2-2) ahead of us. Makes no sense.

They have a quarterback with a proven history of showing up when it matters. We don't.

That make any sense?

You have no pride.

Brad is NOT a Vikings fan.


Brad is a Bucs fan. If you didn't know that you will hopefully now understand the Mahomes posts.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 1:59:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Power Ranking 9.

GB 4

So a team we smashed and 4 teams with worse records (2-2) ahead of us. Makes no sense.

Do you think we would beat those for two and two teams?


No probably not. I'll look elsewhere for something to be offended by.


[&:]

Enjoy your hunt!

ha ha

I thought that was funny, too




Lars -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 2:23:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Power Ranking 9.

GB 4

So a team we smashed and 4 teams with worse records (2-2) ahead of us. Makes no sense.

They have a quarterback with a proven history of showing up when it matters. We don't.

That make any sense?


If The Vikes and their star QB went 13-3 three years in row and with no SB trophies to show for it I doubt anyone would be talking about getting it done when it matters most.

**** Rodgers.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 3:15:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

The thing I worry about is the Vikes haven't have the game where they seem to hit on all cylinders. I know we have more talent than the Chilly days but it reminds me of his first year.

The ST and OLine have looked great in all 4 games. We seem to play smart on the penalty front and outscoring opponents at the end of each half and as a bonus it seems we have had in edge on the coaching side in 3 of the 4 games.

Not the 2009/1998 juggernauts but they seem to have improved on the meh 2020-21 nots.


Oline did not look great against Saints

JMO YMMV

Probably their worst game, I am not concerned (except Bradbury), but I will not overlook a below average performance for 60 percent of the line


SF was killing the LA Rams oline last night--It wasn't great Sunday morning but at least not that jail break.


I don't understand.

You literally said the oline looked great all four games...

Now you say it wasn't great...

I didn't say it was a train wreck, I said it was below average...

Am I missing something?


1 game it wasn't good but overall yes it has looked great. LA Rams oline was worse (of what I saw last night).

So it wasnt good against the saints but it looked great against the eagles?




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 3:24:05 PM)

.
.
a hopeful run plug....


Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
The #Vikings are signing nose tackle Khyiris Tonga off the #Falconsā€™ practice squad, per source.




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 3:35:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

The thing I worry about is the Vikes haven't have the game where they seem to hit on all cylinders. I know we have more talent than the Chilly days but it reminds me of his first year.

The ST and OLine have looked great in all 4 games. We seem to play smart on the penalty front and outscoring opponents at the end of each half and as a bonus it seems we have had in edge on the coaching side in 3 of the 4 games.

Not the 2009/1998 juggernauts but they seem to have improved on the meh 2020-21 nots.


Oline did not look great against Saints

JMO YMMV

Probably their worst game, I am not concerned (except Bradbury), but I will not overlook a below average performance for 60 percent of the line


SF was killing the LA Rams oline last night--It wasn't great Sunday morning but at least not that jail break.


I don't understand.

You literally said the oline looked great all four games...

Now you say it wasn't great...

I didn't say it was a train wreck, I said it was below average...

Am I missing something?


1 game it wasn't good but overall yes it has looked great. LA Rams oline was worse (of what I saw last night).

So it wasnt good against the saints but it looked great against the eagles?


4 games...he was able to pass and had time against both the Eagles and NO.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 3:54:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lars

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Power Ranking 9.

GB 4

So a team we smashed and 4 teams with worse records (2-2) ahead of us. Makes no sense.

They have a quarterback with a proven history of showing up when it matters. We don't.

That make any sense?


If The Vikes and their star QB went 13-3 three years in row and with no SB trophies to show for it I doubt anyone would be talking about getting it done when it matters most.

**** Rodgers.

[sm=dillydilly.jpg][sm=ditto.gif]




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 3:55:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

The thing I worry about is the Vikes haven't have the game where they seem to hit on all cylinders. I know we have more talent than the Chilly days but it reminds me of his first year.

The ST and OLine have looked great in all 4 games. We seem to play smart on the penalty front and outscoring opponents at the end of each half and as a bonus it seems we have had in edge on the coaching side in 3 of the 4 games.

Not the 2009/1998 juggernauts but they seem to have improved on the meh 2020-21 nots.


Oline did not look great against Saints

JMO YMMV

Probably their worst game, I am not concerned (except Bradbury), but I will not overlook a below average performance for 60 percent of the line


SF was killing the LA Rams oline last night--It wasn't great Sunday morning but at least not that jail break.


I don't understand.

You literally said the oline looked great all four games...

Now you say it wasn't great...

I didn't say it was a train wreck, I said it was below average...

Am I missing something?


1 game it wasn't good but overall yes it has looked great. LA Rams oline was worse (of what I saw last night).

So it wasnt good against the saints but it looked great against the eagles?


4 games...he was able to pass and had time against both the Eagles and NO.

nm




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 4:09:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

The thing I worry about is the Vikes haven't have the game where they seem to hit on all cylinders. I know we have more talent than the Chilly days but it reminds me of his first year.

The ST and OLine have looked great in all 4 games. We seem to play smart on the penalty front and outscoring opponents at the end of each half and as a bonus it seems we have had in edge on the coaching side in 3 of the 4 games.

Not the 2009/1998 juggernauts but they seem to have improved on the meh 2020-21 nots.


Oline did not look great against Saints

JMO YMMV

Probably their worst game, I am not concerned (except Bradbury), but I will not overlook a below average performance for 60 percent of the line


SF was killing the LA Rams oline last night--It wasn't great Sunday morning but at least not that jail break.


I don't understand.

You literally said the oline looked great all four games...

Now you say it wasn't great...

I didn't say it was a train wreck, I said it was below average...

Am I missing something?


1 game it wasn't good but overall yes it has looked great. LA Rams oline was worse (of what I saw last night).

So it wasnt good against the saints but it looked great against the eagles?


4 games...he was able to pass and had time against both the Eagles and NO.

nm


Good job on the 'nm'.

In his world, either the OL isn't responsible for run blocking or he thinks they are doing "great" at it.

And those sacks and pressures... minor. Effective blitzes... no problem, because the OL is great.

Do not follow him down his rabbit holes.




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 4:41:37 PM)

.
.
when the vikings are on 1st down:

in 11 personnel we are averaging 8yards per play....ranked 5th
vikings have gained 535 yards passing on 1st down....ranked #1




Jeff Jesser -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 4:47:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Power Ranking 9.

GB 4

So a team we smashed and 4 teams with worse records (2-2) ahead of us. Makes no sense.

They have a quarterback with a proven history of showing up when it matters. We don't.

That make any sense?



Like the playoffs? šŸ˜¬




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:01:57 PM)

Dustin Baker
@DustBaker
Ā·
18m
Most Drops by Team,
WRs, TEs, RBs, FBs,
thru Week 4:

New York Jets (12)
Buffalo Bills (10)
Detroit Lions (9)
Minnesota Vikings (8)
Houston Texans (8)
Washington Commanders (8)




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:03:53 PM)

deleted




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:05:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Dustin Baker
@DustBaker
Ā·
18m
Most Drops by Team,
WRs, TEs, RBs, FBs,
thru Week 4:

New York Jets (12)
Buffalo Bills (10)
Detroit Lions (9)
Minnesota Vikings (8)
Houston Texans (8)
Washington Commanders (8)

I just saw this on Twitter
- that's ugly




Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:06:41 PM)

Also the Vikings have the 4th easiest schedule left.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:07:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

b

That's a new one




Steve Lentz -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:08:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

The thing I worry about is the Vikes haven't have the game where they seem to hit on all cylinders. I know we have more talent than the Chilly days but it reminds me of his first year.

The ST and OLine have looked great in all 4 games. We seem to play smart on the penalty front and outscoring opponents at the end of each half and as a bonus it seems we have had in edge on the coaching side in 3 of the 4 games.

Not the 2009/1998 juggernauts but they seem to have improved on the meh 2020-21 nots.


Oline did not look great against Saints

JMO YMMV

Probably their worst game, I am not concerned (except Bradbury), but I will not overlook a below average performance for 60 percent of the line

Agreed! The OL looked below average to me and remains a weakness on the team.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:09:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

Also the Vikings have the 4th easiest schedule left.

Assuming we know the correct order of best to worst ...
Do we want an easy schedule?




Todd M -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 5:14:02 PM)

I don't understand how Denver stole Latavius Murray off of the Saints practice squad when he just played in a game Sunday.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 6:06:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I don't understand how Denver stole Latavius Murray off of the Saints practice squad when he just played in a game Sunday.


He was a ā€œsingle game elevationā€. He was never signed to the 53 man roster.




Todd M -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 6:08:39 PM)

Now I know that's a thing. Thank you.




David Levine -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 7:31:19 PM)

Since (I think) 2020, teams have been allowed to bring up 2 PS members each game.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/4/2022 8:20:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

b

That's a new one

Typos are nothing new for me




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/5/2022 1:27:58 AM)

I missed it on Sunday and forgot - it turns out Wyatt Davis didnā€™t play after all.




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (10/5/2022 4:02:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I don't understand how Denver stole Latavius Murray off of the Saints practice squad when he just played in a game Sunday.


new ps rules...wild....




Page: <<   < prev  48 49 [50] 51 52   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode