RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message


Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 11:43:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.


Of course. Extremely bias, though ... ;)

I wonder why negative people have such a hard time admitting they are negative? It's just like getting sober, you've gotta be able to admit you are a drunk before you can begin the recovery process.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 11:56:30 AM)

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.




Trekgeekscott -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 12:06:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.



Others have the same data and come to a different opinion.

Imagine that.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 12:17:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.



Others have the same data and come to a different opinion.

Imagine that.


I'm posting specific plays, specific results, things said by coaches and players, etc... I'm being met with replies that are directed specifically at ME - just like your reply there. If you can't argue the post then argue the poster I guess. Stay classy San Diego.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 1:13:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.


Of course. Extremely bias, though ... ;)

I wonder why negative people have such a hard time admitting they are negative? It's just like getting sober, you've gotta be able to admit you are a drunk before you can begin the recovery process.

Hahaha.

I assume that's tongue and cheek ... because, otherwise, it would be the most asinine thing posted in here since ... Marty's post awhile back hoping that racism is alive and well in the nfl so we can keep Flores for longer. (his words, not mine. He did apologize and retract it after.)

Not sharing a high opinion of Cousins does not require perspective re-alignment, aa meetings or non-negative training. No need to come to your senses LOL.

Is not having a positive opinion of Cousins negative? Yes. By definition.

To your point, is that being a negative fan? Yes, if you want to be dogmatic about it, which you are.

Otherwise, there's nothing wrong with being positive or negative if its an honest reaction.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 1:54:14 PM)

Dam.

I've allowed the pro-Cousins camp to get under my skin.

I apologize for chastising and lecturing which is all I do lately.

Which makes me a big negative complainer and hypocrite.

I'm going to take a small break and regroup.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/4/2023 10:12:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.

Thats part of the problem - we're a long ways from 10 years ago




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 7:26:54 AM)

James Lynch torn ACL




Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 7:56:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.

Thats part of the problem - we're a long ways from 10 years ago

Do you think Cousins is going to get better going forward? Last year was a great season for him and he checked down on 4th and 8.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 8:14:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.

Thats part of the problem - we're a long ways from 10 years ago

Do you think Cousins is going to get better going forward? Last year was a great season for him and he checked down on 4th and 8.

hope so




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 8:24:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

This is going nowhere. I have an opinion on a QB based on ten years of experience and data. Let's move on.



Others have the same data and come to a different opinion.

Imagine that.


I'm posting specific plays, specific results, things said by coaches and players, etc... I'm being met with replies that are directed specifically at ME - just like your reply there. If you can't argue the post then argue the poster I guess. Stay classy San Diego.

quote:

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play.


Right. Specfic plays.

eg: On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play.

You take this play and you extrapolate it in to a career. This play to you tells you that there is no way he can win going forward. And then you going on to give compare it to PM and how great he is like he has never done the same thing. HE has. They all have.

And they are not directed at just you it's the mind-set regarding Cousins on this board.




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 8:24:48 AM)

.
.
several had lynch not making the final 53....


EAGAN, Minn. -- Minnesota Vikings defensive lineman James Lynch suffered a torn ACL during a training camp practice Thursday night and is expected to miss the 2023 season, a source confirmed to ESPN on Friday.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 9:26:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Cousins is merely a game manager who once in a while starts zinging the ball all over. But the latter is not in his DNA.

He is a statue and going off script is not in his nature, so he is a problem. We are stuck with someone who would be perfect under Vince Lombardi while the styles of Mahomes, Allen, and several others are what's needed.


As soon as you mention Mahomes, Allen and others (Hebert, Burrow) it becomes a straw man...pretty much everyone is aware he isn't a top 5 qb.


I said their STYLES. And you decided to add two QBs to the list to basically put words in my mouth... two players who I would NOT consider.

Comprehension isn't your strong suit. More like non-existent.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 9:33:43 AM)

People continually bitching about others being "negative" appear to me to be.... negative.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 9:41:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.


Of course. Extremely bias, though ... ;)

I wonder why negative people have such a hard time admitting they are negative? It's just like getting sober, you've gotta be able to admit you are a drunk before you can begin the recovery process.

Hahaha.

I assume that's tongue and cheek ... because, otherwise, it would be the most asinine thing posted in here since ... Marty's post awhile back hoping that racism is alive and well in the nfl so we can keep Flores for longer. (his words, not mine. He did apologize and retract it after.)

Not sharing a high opinion of Cousins does not require perspective re-alignment, aa meetings or non-negative training. No need to come to your senses LOL.

Is not having a positive opinion of Cousins negative? Yes. By definition.

To your point, is that being a negative fan? Yes, if you want to be dogmatic about it, which you are.

Otherwise, there's nothing wrong with being positive or negative if its an honest reaction.


It is asinine. Somewhat cultist.

The opposite analogy would be the sliver of zealot pro-Cousins fans who are like old school Jehovah Witness people on your porch chanting how negative you are because you are not on board with their outlook.

When 90% of posts over months on end from someone are of a singular topic (to make Cousins look good, the label others as negative) in my book that is an obsession.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 10:48:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.

It is extremely myopic of you if you can't see how the Vikings can win it all with Kirk.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 11:24:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.


He's coming up on year 12. He's really the same stat guy that Washington fans couldn't wait to get rid of, although he did finally win a prime time game.




Ricky J -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 1:44:39 PM)

Andrew Krammer
@Andrew_Krammer
·
25m
Cornerback Andrew Booth Jr. didn't get into specifics of injury, but said he's dealing with "nothing serious" and intends to "be back on the grass" on Sunday. He was at the team's walkthrough today.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 1:55:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

Andrew Krammer
@Andrew_Krammer
·
25m
Cornerback Andrew Booth Jr. didn't get into specifics of injury, but said he's dealing with "nothing serious" and intends to "be back on the grass" on Sunday. He was at the team's walkthrough today.


[:D][sm=buttrock.gif][sm=comfort.gif][sm=doindadomodance.gif][sm=dothewave.gif]
I will not give up hope on Booth.




Todd M -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 3:04:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

Andrew Krammer
@Andrew_Krammer
·
25m
Cornerback Andrew Booth Jr. didn't get into specifics of injury, but said he's dealing with "nothing serious" and intends to "be back on the grass" on Sunday


Where he'll tweak something.




Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 5:08:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

Andrew Krammer
@Andrew_Krammer
·
25m
Cornerback Andrew Booth Jr. didn't get into specifics of injury, but said he's dealing with "nothing serious" and intends to "be back on the grass" on Sunday


Where he'll tweak something.

[&:]




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 5:37:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

On the show quarterback, they highlight a play early in the game at Philly last year. They run Cook up the gut for -1 yard. Kirk says he should have checked out of the play based on the look of the D. Coach says the same. It was obvious to everyone within a half mile of the line of scrimmage. But he just ran the damn play. Meanwhile Mahomes is identifying D schemes after getting picked and is talking on the sideline to his coaches and players about how to make them pay - and then does. Mahomes is allowed to design plays (must be approved by Andy Reid) and is shown calling and performing them for easy TDS. Meanwhile Kirk is speaking the existing play calls that are givin to him on Tuesday into his phone so he can practice saying them out loud during the week. Yes - Kirk works hard - to stay slightly above average.

So Mahomes never ran a play he had bad vibes about and wished he would of checked out of it later. There isn't a QB that hasn't done that. You make it sound like Kirk does it every other series.

sigh


Technically the series on TV makes it sound like that. Of course there are exceptions to all of this - tons of them. When Kirk ran the ball in for a TD against Arizona (I think?) that was an exception - and what a great one! The series showed that too and filmed coaches takes on it after the fact (coaches loved it). These are still just exceptions though. The theme of the show is clear to me. They are highlighting an elite QB, an above average one, and a poor one. Mahomes has won two super bowls and played in three and won the division title every year he's played. Cousins has one playoff win. Mariota gets benched.

I disagree. Game 2. Kirk says it's one of those moments that he realized he wasn't comfortable yet in the [new] system. "Our guy" is going to give you the truth all day regardless if it makes him look bad.

Probably some bias here and people are seeing what they want to see I'll concede that but this series focuses a lot on how difficult it is to play QB. There's much more to it than physical ability. It makes me wonder how those that aren't super motivated would look with an in-depth view into their job performance.

Eight billion people on the planet and we have one of the guys that can win us a SB. This would be a good time for everyone, for one time, to drop all preconceived notions and just roll with some positivity - "negativity sucks!" One time!


"wasn't comfortable yet in the system" Dude's been in the NFL for 10 years. Favre came to the team in 2009, took one look at Chilly's kick-ass offense, and hijacked the playcalling. He didn't need to get familiar because he'd played the position enough to have an understanding of the game. Kirk doesn't have that. I disagree 100% that we have one of the people on the planet that can win a super bowl. Acknowledging this doesn't make me negative, a bad fan, or indicate an agenda.

It is extremely myopic of you if you can't see how the Vikings can win it all with Kirk.



😂😂😂. I’m still not convinced that you aren’t purposefully trolling while being fully aware of how damn funny these posts would be if they were in fact, trolling.




Daniel Lee Young -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 6:19:53 PM)

Have you seen his posts on other topics?

Cue the first three lines of “ all star” …




Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 7:32:49 PM)

Well you can put me in the "negative" camp because I've seen enough to formulate the opinion that no team is winning it all with Kirk. It's not his physical ability obviously. I'd be trying to get a young qb but that's just me. Like David said, win the bowl and get the huge contract.




Richard Neussendorfer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (8/5/2023 7:36:18 PM)

For the record I was fully on board with the signing as I didn't think Keenum would ever duplicate his success. Years later and I've seem enough. Sure he'll make some great throws and have some great games this season. But watch the way things crumble when it counts.




Page: <<   < prev  35 36 [37] 38 39   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode