Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (9/3/2024 12:41:26 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ricky J How good does a backup have to be? Not looking to be snarky here ;) Some backups become famous, some youd never know if you didn't follow the game closely. Hall looked good last game, but as i noted before it looked like all his targets were wide open (on the highlights anyway) The snarky insinuation that you don't have to be very good ... disqualifies you from our next GM opening. Wait ... on our team ... talent < staying in your backup lane ... so you may still be in play, since not being good as a backup QB is non-disqualifying. In 2022, the first order of backup QB business was to resign Sean Mannion (who had already been signed and resigned) to pair with leftover Mond. In 2023, we drafted Hall to replace Mond and traded for Mullens to replace Mannion (who ended up on our PS). 2024 has us going up to final cutdowns to eject Hall for Rypien. So ... Mannion (signed 2019 / resigned 2021 / resigned 2022 / PS 2023) Mullens (traded for 2022, extended 2023) Mond (leftover) Hall (drafted) Dobbs (traded for) Rypien (signed) ... How good does a backup have to be, you ask? Not very good. And not only not very good, but just as critical, we seem to double and triple down on not very good. And maybe even worse, we ride our bad backup QBs all offseason and don't change them out until we are deep into the process – long after the new bad backups have any chance of integrating into our system and performing all the way up to their low ceiling.
|
|
|
|