quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

One compelling reason to be excited about Rodgers? Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores had major conviction that he was a guy they should bring into their building, Kevin O'Connell said on Tuesday at the annual league meeting in Florida. And Flores is usually pretty accurate when he gets that way about a player, O'Connell added.

"Isaiah was a guy that Flo really identified pretty early," he said. "And historically, I haven't been doing this long with Flo, but when Flo kinda has that tone in his voice about guys — I'm not gonna mention the other ones that he has had that in his voice about — but he's been pretty darn accurate. And that guy, whether playing for us or somebody else, has immediately shown up. So no pressure on Isaiah, but he definitely got that evaluation from Flo."

KOC: "I think he's got the ability to make plays on the football, he's got some ability to do something with it when he does catch it. Whether he ends up being a part of the return game or not is really just going to come down to how the rest of our roster shapes out. Because I see Isaiah being an every-down impact guy."

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

Date check ya fools!

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he was, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

Go y’all are so easy

[sm=fishhook.gif]

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

One compelling reason to be excited about Rodgers? Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores had major conviction that he was a guy they should bring into their building, Kevin O'Connell said on Tuesday at the annual league meeting in Florida. And Flores is usually pretty accurate when he gets that way about a player, O'Connell added.

"Isaiah was a guy that Flo really identified pretty early," he said. "And historically, I haven't been doing this long with Flo, but when Flo kinda has that tone in his voice about guys — I'm not gonna mention the other ones that he has had that in his voice about — but he's been pretty darn accurate. And that guy, whether playing for us or somebody else, has immediately shown up. So no pressure on Isaiah, but he definitely got that evaluation from Flo."

KOC: "I think he's got the ability to make plays on the football, he's got some ability to do something with it when he does catch it. Whether he ends up being a part of the return game or not is really just going to come down to how the rest of our roster shapes out. Because I see Isaiah being an every-down impact guy."

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

Date check ya fools!

Yeah, Sports Illustrated and ESPN ran nationally with an April Fools story about Isaiah Rodgers...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

One compelling reason to be excited about Rodgers? Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores had major conviction that he was a guy they should bring into their building, Kevin O'Connell said on Tuesday at the annual league meeting in Florida. And Flores is usually pretty accurate when he gets that way about a player, O'Connell added.

"Isaiah was a guy that Flo really identified pretty early," he said. "And historically, I haven't been doing this long with Flo, but when Flo kinda has that tone in his voice about guys — I'm not gonna mention the other ones that he has had that in his voice about — but he's been pretty darn accurate. And that guy, whether playing for us or somebody else, has immediately shown up. So no pressure on Isaiah, but he definitely got that evaluation from Flo."

KOC: "I think he's got the ability to make plays on the football, he's got some ability to do something with it when he does catch it. Whether he ends up being a part of the return game or not is really just going to come down to how the rest of our roster shapes out. Because I see Isaiah being an every-down impact guy."

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

Date check ya fools!

Yeah, Sports Illustrated and ESPN ran nationally with an April Fools story about Isaiah Rodgers...

SI - which I had already read and thought you were referring to - clearly was writing about CB Isaiah.

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

One compelling reason to be excited about Rodgers? Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores had major conviction that he was a guy they should bring into their building, Kevin O'Connell said on Tuesday at the annual league meeting in Florida. And Flores is usually pretty accurate when he gets that way about a player, O'Connell added.

"Isaiah was a guy that Flo really identified pretty early," he said. "And historically, I haven't been doing this long with Flo, but when Flo kinda has that tone in his voice about guys — I'm not gonna mention the other ones that he has had that in his voice about — but he's been pretty darn accurate. And that guy, whether playing for us or somebody else, has immediately shown up. So no pressure on Isaiah, but he definitely got that evaluation from Flo."

KOC: "I think he's got the ability to make plays on the football, he's got some ability to do something with it when he does catch it. Whether he ends up being a part of the return game or not is really just going to come down to how the rest of our roster shapes out. Because I see Isaiah being an every-down impact guy."

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

Date check ya fools!

Yeah, Sports Illustrated and ESPN ran nationally with an April Fools story about Isaiah Rodgers...

SI - which I had already read and thought you were referring to - clearly was writing about CB Isaiah.

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/koc-brian-flores-had-major-conviction-vikings-first-free-agent-pickup

You think?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Bullshit. There were a few of who said the same thing. I said very few QB had been set up to fail the way Darnold had through his career and he could have a breakout year. Others said the same thing.

McCarthy was the long term plan. Darnold was the plan for 2024.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Even with a bad draft, with what the Vikings did in FA (and trades), if McCarthy is mediocre, the Vikings are a Super Bowl contender this season.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Bullshit. There were a few of who said the same thing. I said very few QB had been set up to fail the way Darnold had through his career and he could have a breakout year. Others said the same thing.

McCarthy was the long term plan. Darnold was the plan for 2024.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that. I don't think anyone saw Sam Darnold starting all 17 games in 2024. I know I didn't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

It's not foolish love. Packer players love playing in MN, what's the prob with that?

The "too many men on the field" followed by the interception, how can you blame anyone for thinking it'll never happen? But we carry on - especially that all those people are gone, not to be heard from again ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Why? You wait 2 weeks after we are building an amazing team with that money saved and you double down on the past. Each year is a new year Brad.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Why? You wait 2 weeks after we are building an amazing team with that money saved and you double down on the past. Each year is a new year Brad.

I asked what the backup plan was at quarterback. Got no answers, only criticisms.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

It's not foolish love. Packer players love playing in MN, what's the prob with that?

The "too many men on the field" followed by the interception, how can you blame anyone for thinking it'll never happen? But we carry on - especially that all those people are gone, not to be heard from again ...

I don't know if you remember Tavaris or not....but we moved up and down the field and kicked 6 FGs against Indy and the defense shutdown Indy for 3 quarters and still lost. That day was when a change was coming.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

It's not foolish love. Packer players love playing in MN, what's the prob with that?

The "too many men on the field" followed by the interception, how can you blame anyone for thinking it'll never happen? But we carry on - especially that all those people are gone, not to be heard from again ...

I don't know if you remember Tavaris or not....but we moved up and down the field and kicked 6 FGs against Indy and the defense shutdown Indy for 3 quarters and still lost. That day was when a change was coming.

No idea what your point is but we kicked 5 FG’s…missed another and only kept Indy in check the 1st half.

So good job making no point with faulty information.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Why? You wait 2 weeks after we are building an amazing team with that money saved and you double down on the past. Each year is a new year Brad.

I asked what the backup plan was at quarterback. Got no answers, only criticisms.

You are jumping the gun...we haven't even hit the draft yet. That is 3 weeks to go. We aren't even finished with phase 1 of a 3 or 4 phase offseason. You still are acting butt hurt.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Why? You wait 2 weeks after we are building an amazing team with that money saved and you double down on the past. Each year is a new year Brad.

I asked what the backup plan was at quarterback. Got no answers, only criticisms.

You are jumping the gun...we haven't even hit the draft yet. That is 3 weeks to go. We aren't even finished with phase 1 of a 3 or 4 phase offseason. You still are acting butt hurt.

Is that right? A 3-or-4 phase plan huh? You care to elaborate on those 3-4 phases, because nobody from Vikings management has ever mentioned them?

We saw what happened to Miami last season when they didn't have a backup plan. The offense was an absolute disaster after Tua got hurt.

But it's good they have this 3-or-4 phase plan that nobody seems to be aware of. I feel better now.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

All I am saying is this; it is very arrogant not to have a legitimate backup plan. Last year they had a legitimate backup plan. They won 14 games.

With a better interior o-line, my expectation is 15+ wins. If not, it will be a disappointing season.

What was the backup plan last year? Mullens? Rypien? Darnold being the starter was always the plan, even before McCarthy got hurt. We won 14 games because we didn't need the backup plan.

When we broke camp, Sam Darnold was the backup plan. He may have been tabbed the opening day starter, but there was no doubt that McCarthy was going to be the starter at some point in the very near future.

Thank goodness we had a backup plan.

Sam Darnold was not the backup plan. Do you really think he would have been yanked for McCarthy, given the year he was having?

Sam Darnold was never a long-term plan when they were at camp. McCarthy was the plan, which is why they drafted him.

What happened afterwards was irrelevant because McCarthy got hurt. Nobody thought Darnold was as capable as he ended up being, and I mean NOBODY! Nobody in here. Nobody in there. Nobody anywhere.

Turns out, he was. I was the only one in here claiming we need to give him a chance and that it was easily going to be the most talent he has ever had around him since being drafted. Admittedly, I never thought he would win 14 games.

When you win 14 games with that miserable-ass offensive line, you have some talent. It didn't end well. Nobody denies that.

Why? You wait 2 weeks after we are building an amazing team with that money saved and you double down on the past. Each year is a new year Brad.

I asked what the backup plan was at quarterback. Got no answers, only criticisms.

You are jumping the gun...we haven't even hit the draft yet. That is 3 weeks to go. We aren't even finished with phase 1 of a 3 or 4 phase offseason. You still are acting butt hurt.

Is that right? A 3-or-4 phase plan huh? You care to elaborate on those 3-4 phases, because nobody from Vikings management has ever mentioned them?

We saw what happened to Miami last season when they didn't have a backup plan. The offense was an absolute disaster after Tua got hurt.

But it's good they have this 3-or-4 phase plan that nobody seems to be aware of. I feel better now.

Every offseason is 3 or 4 phases. FA, Draft, Post Draft FA, Pre TC Cuts. You know it and everyone just sees you are butt hurt.

Oh and there was priority for Sam. He was signed in the 1st Phase last year.