RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message

Duane Sampson -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/16/2013 1:29:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


If you say so. You are very confident in what Speilman and Co. think.



Ricky J -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/16/2013 6:52:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

quote:

ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson

I predict a lot of people on this board will have a Cassel boner all week...



Considering half this board had a three year boner for Ponder, based on nothing more than excuses and hope, it wouldn't surprise me.

Im pretty sure I didn't have a boner



69in09 -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 8:32:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


Let's check back on that one Dec 30th.



Ricky J -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 8:53:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


Sure could do worse



Todd M -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 8:56:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


Sure could do worse



I was no believer in Cassel but he's done more to win me over than Ponder has.

We were waiting for a guy to be able to take advantage of the defenses set up to stop AD. Cassel lit it up without him.



69in09 -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 8:59:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

quote:

ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson

I predict a lot of people on this board will have a Cassel boner all week...



Considering half this board had a three year boner for Ponder, based on nothing more than excuses and hope, it wouldn't surprise me.


Yeah, tent city around here.



marty -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 10:24:44 PM)

10-5 and got my lock, not a bad week. NICE job Prescott, picking the Bears, and moving into 2nd place only being in it a for a short time. Brad and Ricky missed opportunities for sole possession of 2nd.

So, now we have:

DrViking 6
Brad 2
Marty 2
Prescott 2
Ricky 1
Ian -2 (J/K Ian !)



marty -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/17/2013 10:33:57 PM)

WOW, only missed this teaser by ONE, getting 13 out of 14. The one miss was the Over/Under with Seattle/NY, picked the over but Seattle pitched a shutout.

1) Atl +6, SF +4, Ari/TEN O 31 1/2, Sea/NY GIANTS O 31 1/2, Chi + 12 1/2, INDY + 5 1/2, JAX + 13, MIA +13, MIN + 13 1/2, Car -2, KC + 6 1/2, GB/Dal O38, PITTS + 11, Bal + 15 1/2

And only missed the other by 2, getting 12 of 14, so close. Just missed as Giants + 16 1/2 wasn't enough, and KC Oak didn't stay under by a long shot. There were quite a few high scores this past weekend.

2) Atl +6, SF/TB O 32, NO/ST.LOU O 37, NY GIANTS + 16 1/2, Chi/CLEV O 33, HOU/INDY U 55 1/2, Buf/JAX O 34, NE/MIA O 35 1/2, Phi/MIN O 40 1/2, NY Jets/Car U 51, KC/OAK U 51, GB + 18, Cincy/PITTS O 31, Bal + 15 1/2



Ricky J -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 8:22:21 AM)

Odds are off for GB/Pitt -- I'll take GB



John Childress -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 9:03:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


Sure could do worse

Not really

Cassel is not good enough to win a SB and not bad enough to lose enough games for us to get Bridgewater/Winston level of QB

football purgatory



drviking -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 10:24:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: John Childress

I don't think anyone thinks Cassel is the answer


Sure could do worse

Not really

Cassel is not good enough to win a SB and not bad enough to lose enough games for us to get Bridgewater/Winston level of QB

football purgatory



gotta have some balls....

swing for the fence....

try everything else, and if you end up with cassell, i can live with that


but to go 'ponder' on it, and dont even bring in any competition for cassell....then these morons didnt learn anything



Trekgeekscott -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 10:53:39 AM)

I will be ok with Cassell starting next year under one condition, they have a highly drafted rookied as his underling learning.  A Bridgewater, Bortles, Carr etc...  If they go into next year with Cassel and Ponder or Freeman or some other never will be or has been schlub, then this org is doomed to failure until the entire front office is cleaned out of everyone not nambed Brzezinski.




Troy Newell -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 11:06:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

I will be ok with Cassell starting next year under one condition, they have a highly drafted rookied as his underling learning.  A Bridgewater, Bortles, Carr etc...  If they go into next year with Cassel and Ponder or Freeman or some other never will be or has been schlub, then this org is doomed to failure until the entire front office is cleaned out of everyone not nambed Brzezinski.




It will be very hard financially for the Vikings to not keep Ponder as a back up QB. Ponder is going to cost the Vikings $3,232,313 dollars against the cap, whether he is on the roster or not.



Trekgeekscott -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 11:10:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Troy Newell

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

I will be ok with Cassell starting next year under one condition, they have a highly drafted rookied as his underling learning.  A Bridgewater, Bortles, Carr etc...  If they go into next year with Cassel and Ponder or Freeman or some other never will be or has been schlub, then this org is doomed to failure until the entire front office is cleaned out of everyone not nambed Brzezinski.




It will be very hard financially for the Vikings to not keep Ponder as a back up QB. Ponder is going to cost the Vikings $3,232,313 dollars against the cap, whether he is on the roster or not.


There is no justification for keeping Ponder on the roster.  If he can't play the game, he needs to go. 

Keeping him for something like a cap hit would be mind-numbingly stupid.



John Childress -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 12:27:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

I will be ok with Cassell starting next year under one condition, they have a highly drafted rookied as his underling learning.  A Bridgewater, Bortles, Carr etc...  If they go into next year with Cassel and Ponder or Freeman or some other never will be or has been schlub, then this org is doomed to failure until the entire front office is cleaned out of everyone not nambed Brzezinski.




BINGO

It would be waste of everyone's time to think Cassel is a legit starter and the answer at QB

Just as bad would be bringing Ponder back here

If EITHER of those two occur, then you know management is not serious about putting a winner on the field



Todd M -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 2:47:14 PM)

Me and Ricky are thinking...

WCWTSBWC! (we can win the super bowl with Matt Cassel)

WCHWTSBTYICS (we could have won the super bowl this year if Cassel started)



Trekgeekscott -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 3:12:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Me and Ricky are thinking...

WCWTSBWC!

WCHWTSBTYICS


Confirms what many believe...that what you think is often nonsensical jibberish.



Todd M -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 5:01:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Me and Ricky are thinking...

WCWTSBWC!

WCHWTSBTYICS


Confirms what many believe...that what you think is often nonsensical jibberish.


This you being funny? Or just a dick?

Pretty easy to decode...not that knowing what it says makes it less gibberish-y.

Anyway, GFY...can you decode that?



Prescott -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 5:20:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Me and Ricky are thinking...

WCWTSBWC! (we can win the super bowl with Matt Cassel)

WCHWTSBTYICS (we could have won the super bowl this year if Cassel started)


I wouldn't say hard, but I agree that it's a distinct possibility he remains on the roster.



Bill Jandro -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 6:04:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

I will be ok with Cassell starting next year under one condition, they have a highly drafted rookied as his underling learning.  A Bridgewater, Bortles, Carr etc...  If they go into next year with Cassel and Ponder or Freeman or some other never will be or has been schlub, then this org is doomed to failure until the entire front office is cleaned out of everyone not nambed Brzezinski.




Tarkenton suggested we go DE and then grab Murray in the 2nd

I think we should keep Cassell and draft two QB's. One high (Carr) and take a Murray or someone else in the third. Thats alot of resources but we cannot afford to fail again



Bill Jandro -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 6:07:51 PM)

I think we might be able to trade Ponder for maybe a 6th rd pick. I would easily take that just to get him not only out of here but not having to take a cap hit



thebigo -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 8:17:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

quote:

ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson

I predict a lot of people on this board will have a Cassel boner all week...



Considering half this board had a three year boner for Ponder, based on nothing more than excuses and hope, it wouldn't surprise me.

Im pretty sure I didn't have a boner


There's medicine for that.



marty -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 8:21:48 PM)

I agree with JC on this.

The question is, will there be a starter available that is definitely a better option than Cassel ?

A similar option like Matt Flynn ? Kirk Cousins ? ????



Ricky J -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 8:47:10 PM)

FRP!



Ricky J -> RE: Predictions for Next Week (and maybe beyond) (12/18/2013 8:48:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

quote:

ORIGINAL: Duane Sampson

I predict a lot of people on this board will have a Cassel boner all week...



Considering half this board had a three year boner for Ponder, based on nothing more than excuses and hope, it wouldn't surprise me.

Im pretty sure I didn't have a boner


There's medicine for that.

[&:]

You gotta love it!



Page: <<   < prev  106 107 [108] 109 110   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode