RE: College Basketball (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Other Minnesota Sports] >> Minnesota Timberwolves



Message

djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 5:00:42 PM)

Tough, tough loss for Tommy Amaker and Harvard.

Hopefully his boys get a chance to dance anyway.



drew -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 5:15:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: djskillz

Curious everyone's thoughts on these tourney bubble teams. Not what teams "will be in", but what teams "should be in" in your mind. I'll start:

11 spots up for grabs

Tennessee--no, most inconsistent team in the country
Michigan--yes
Washington--yes
Villanova--yes, barely
Richmond--yes
Illinois--yes, barely
Saint Mary's--yes, barely
USC--no
Colorado--yes
Virginia Tech--yes
Clemson--yes
Penn St.--no
Texas El-Paso--yes, barely
Georgia--no, barely
Boston College--yes, barely
Alabama--no, barely

Also, who should be the #1 seeds? I'd go:

Ohio State-win or lose
Kansas-win or lose
Whichever of Duke/UNC advances farther
Pitt

with the 2's being:
Notre Dame
Texas
Whichever of Duke/UNC loses out
Winner of BYU/San Diego State game


I agree with your 1's and 2's.  I know you're a Duke fan (hey, nobody's perfect) and I'm definitely not, but I think they're going to house UNC tomorrow after watching both games today.  Smith looked pretty damn good for not knowing if he was going to play early in the day.  UNC just loses their defensive intensity for stretches and that won't fly against the Devils.

Is there really a chance Harvard could get an at-large berth?  I hope so, but I can't see it happening.

And yes, there's no doubt this is the best time of the year.  The older I get, I almost like Championship Week as much as the tourney.  Such incredible effort these kids play with! 



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 5:24:29 PM)

I don't know; I'd never count out UNC. It will hinge on Nolan/Marshall, Singler/Barnes, and foul trouble (ie officiating) for the Plumlees. Should be another great game as usual IMO. It's also basically a home game for UNC.

Harvard's got an outside shot; not likely, but a shot. Feel terrible for Amaker and his boys. 65 years is a LONG time.

Totally agree on Championship Week. I'm glued!



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 5:33:37 PM)

Kansas would still be my pick to win it all, btw. If Irving somehow plays for Duke (you never know) that would change things and they'd be my heavy favorite. But failing that, I'll stick with Kansas.

I think Ohio State is very good, but will get beat.

Syracuse and Florida will both surprise a bit I think and go far. Big men.

I'd say the only other teams besides Kansas and OSU with really great shots to win it are Duke/UNC/Texas/Pitt. I'll be relatively shocked if anyone wins it but one of those 6 teams. And honestly I'll personally be fairly surprised if even OSU wins it.

The one thing that I think separates 4 of those 6 from the other 2 is coaching. I think Mata and Barnes are a step below the other coaches of those 6.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 6:39:13 PM)

REALLY pains me to see Malcolm Thomas enjoying so much success....at San Diego State.



Steve Lentz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 7:00:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: djskillz

Kansas would still be my pick to win it all, btw. If Irving somehow plays for Duke (you never know) that would change things and they'd be my heavy favorite. But failing that, I'll stick with Kansas.

I think Ohio State is very good, but will get beat.

Syracuse and Florida will both surprise a bit I think and go far. Big men.

I'd say the only other teams besides Kansas and OSU with really great shots to win it are Duke/UNC/Texas/Pitt. I'll be relatively shocked if anyone wins it but one of those 6 teams. And honestly I'll personally be fairly surprised if even OSU wins it.

The one thing that I think separates 4 of those 6 from the other 2 is coaching. I think Mata and Barnes are a step below the other coaches of those 6.


I wouldn't put Texas in that group. Florida is more dangerous IMO.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 7:03:58 PM)

Not sure, Steve. Texas has as much overall talent as anyone, if not more, IMO. I think they're very dangerous.



drew -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 7:41:52 PM)

Dang.  I missed the end of the Pac 10 game.  I bet Gus Johnson blew an O ring when Thomas made that shot.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 9:10:00 PM)

A pathetic turnout at the Staples Center for that one. Great game though.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 9:19:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: djskillz

Sullinger gets about as many BS calls as I've ever seen one college player get.



Wow. I don't see that at all. He maybe gets away with camping in the lane for 5 seconds at a time, but he certainly doesn't get the benefit of the call like Fredette or Thompson.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 9:24:12 PM)

I think a ton of his moves to the basket when he lowers his shoulder the opposition is in good straight-up defensive position and he gets the call. This happens a minimum of 4-5 times a game every time I see them play IMO.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 9:28:01 PM)

You're not a Sullinger fan nor a OSU fan, think that has anything to do with how you see it?



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 9:58:06 PM)

Not really. I have nothing against OSU when it comes to basketball.

I'm not a Sullinger fan BECAUSE I think he (and they) are overrated because of the calls he gets.

They, and he, are very good, but I don't see him always getting those calls.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 10:06:46 PM)

I don't get the overrated thing. He's not going to be the Player of the Year, and he wasn't even the player of his conference. He's not flashy, he's humble, he has amazing lower body strength and positions himself well, and he has a very high BB IQ. He rebounds and plays defense. Who is overrating him? And aside from your highly subjective opinion that the officials love him, what's wrong with his game?



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 10:22:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

I don't get the overrated thing. He's not going to be the Player of the Year, and he wasn't even the player of his conference. He's not flashy, he's humble, he has amazing lower body strength and positions himself well, and he has a very high BB IQ. He rebounds and plays defense. Who is overrating him? And aside from your highly subjective opinion that the officials love him, what's wrong with his game?


Nothing's really wrong with his game. He's solid. I just don't think he's a superstar, like a lot of the media seems to make him out to be. He's very, very good though, certainly. One of the better players in the country.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 10:28:00 PM)

Incredibly impressive tournament performance by UConn. Hats off to them.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 10:49:32 PM)

Best conference in the country and best basketball played on a nightly basis, but I don't see a Big East team making it to the championship game.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 10:52:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

Best conference in the country and best basketball played on a nightly basis, but I don't see a Big East team making it to the championship game.


I tend to agree. I think Pitt's the only team with a real shot.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/12/2011 11:31:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: djskillz

quote:

ORIGINAL: JT2

Best conference in the country and best basketball played on a nightly basis, but I don't see a Big East team making it to the championship game.


I tend to agree. I think Pitt's the only team with a real shot.



I think Dixon is a great coach. But I think they are too guard heavy. I love what McGhee brings in terms of toughness, energy and hustle, but they are very limited inside.



Ian Joseph -> RE: College Basketball (3/13/2011 3:16:31 PM)

After a year hiatus, the bracket challenge returns.. stay tuned. It opens up later today.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/13/2011 3:19:12 PM)

Could see that, JT.

Gotta say; I didn't expect that easy of a win for Duke today. Thought it would be a dogfight. Very impressive. They played with a purpose all game, and Kelly has really grown on me. Such a smart big man and uses the skills he does have well.

Duke should be a #1 seed, and I still expect them to be. I just don't see a good argument for Notre Dame over them after ND lost and Duke won their conference title.



Steve Lentz -> RE: College Basketball (3/13/2011 5:38:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: djskillz

Not sure, Steve. Texas has as much overall talent as anyone, if not more, IMO. I think they're very dangerous.


Florida is a 2 seed. Texas is a 4.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/14/2011 9:38:10 AM)

Which is unbelievable to me. There was some serious overrating of the SEC in that selection committee.

Georgia a 10 seed? Really? And how the hell is Florida a 2 while Kentucky is a 4? That makes zero sense. Texas should have been at worst a 3.

VaTech and Colorado got royally screwed, as pretty much every analyst said last night. Ditto for St. Mary's IMO. The members that formed the committee this year should never be allowed to participate again. Just an awful, awful job on the whole this year.

And I agree with the sentiment that they should look to retired coaches (Knight, Thompson, etc.) to fill out the committee. Would be much better than the current system where it's clearly people who don't know anything.



JT2 -> RE: College Basketball (3/14/2011 12:02:40 PM)

VTech had some really bad losses.  Getting swept by Virginia and BC didn't help their cause.

There's always going to be teams left out that are deserving.  It's still better than the football playoff system.



djskillz -> RE: College Basketball (3/14/2011 12:08:28 PM)

Sure, but that's a pretty low bar, don't you think? [:D] I HATE college football's system; bowl games are an absolute joke; a .500 record should not merit a "bowl" game. Anyway...

Ya, they definitely had some bad losses. But they're still a better team, with a better overall resume, than VCU or UAB, IMO. Colorado has an even bigger gripe. Both should have been in. I would have put both in over Georgia, for that matter. The SEC is highly overrated by this bracket IMO. UT should have been a 10 or worse IMO. Georgia shouldn't have been in. Florida should have been a 4 or worse. Kentucky/Vandy were about right IMO. Vandy really got a tough draw again. I think they'll get by Richmond after two tough-loss exits the last two years, but if they're matched up with Louisville next? Ouch, that could really be a blowout IMO. I'm not a big fan of Vandy's ball-handling and I think Louisville could really hurt them with their defensive pressure there. About as bad a matchup as Vandy could get IMO.



Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode