TJSweens -> RE: Gopher Football (11/28/2018 12:00:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke quote:
ORIGINAL: TJSweens I like the idea of the program pushing itself to the highest level it can achieve every year. Actually as young as they are, I honestly thought the ceiling this year was 6-6 and a little bowl berth. That's right where they ended up. But Fleck is still accountable. It's on Fleck that they did this great purge. They didn't 'Have' to go this young. He didn't inherit a bare cupboard. He inherited a 9 win team with a bowl win. I can see why a new coach does it. Loading up the team with a bunch of freshmen serves two purposes. It gets 'His' players on the team quicker and lets him start molding it his way. And it also gives him a built in 2 year excuse. Gives him a two year pass to have shitty records. They'll never call it an excuse. In true coach speak they'll emphatically deny it's an excuse...meanwhile pointing out every chance they get how young the team is. Let's be clear. The team Fleck inherited was not going to win 9 games again, no matter who coached it. They graduated good players, others transferred when Claeys was fired and other than RB, the cupboard was pretty bare. I disagree with the notion that Fleck played freshmen to build in 2 years of excuses. Coaches try to take advantage of the honeymoon phase to redshirt as many players as possible. Fleck was playing freshmen and sophmores because that is the bulk of his roster and the upper classmen on his roster weren't very good. Like I said, where Fleck is rippable is that he waited too long to address the defensive problems. The performance of this team after he changed DC's and simplified the scheme underscored the winnable games they tossed away earlier in the year. The talent on this team may be young, but with proper coaching on the defensive side of the ball, they could have been a lot more competitive than they were. This team had the talent to be more. The fact that they weren't is on Fleck.
|
|
|
|