Guest -> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) (1/2/2015 1:29:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer quote:
ORIGINAL: Art quote:
ORIGINAL: djskillz I think it's a bit like baseball/moneyball. Moneyball isn't dead in baseball. It's more alive than ever. It's just that teams with more money started copying Billy Beane and the approach and, not shockingly, had success with it. Similarly, and I think you've alluded to this in the past, Andy: Ohio State looked like a freaking SEC team yesterday. SEC recruits, and Urban Meyer coaching, who along with Saban, is head and shoulders above anybody else in the college coaching ranks right now. Hell, Urban Meyer has stated his ENTIRE goal in building the OSU program was to beat "the gold standard Alabama". He's accomplished it, quickly. Agree on this year's QB play, Andy. Sims and Kiffin sure did Alabama in. They should have relied more heavily on Henry, who may be the best back in the country, when they actually give him the ball. Very impressive win by OSU, and I think they have an outstanding chance vs. Oregon now. But I'm not sure if any of these games are played out 100 times that this result happens even 25-30 times. But hey, you have to give credit; that's why they play the games. Still, don't kid yourself; all these SEC teams will be back among the top next year, and (except maybe OSU/TCU), will likely win the championship in 2016. You are certainly in the minority Dustin. I'm an old school guy and like defense and a running game as much as anyone. But the game is changing ... as it always has ... and it won't be long before the SEC either has to adapt or become a dinosaur. Agree with your premise Art, but I haven't seen much defense out of the SEC this year. The scores have been higher than ever. I don't watch a ton of SEC, but the yards aren't always indicative of the defense played. I've learned that from watching a lot of Oregon football over the years. For instance yesterday vs. FSU ... Oregon basically gave them between the hashes and between the 20's as a game plan. No outs and nothing deep. They were OK giving up the middle and trying to create turnovers. 500+ yards, but 20 points. Some heads today are saying FSU made their own errors, and they did, but the first two turnovers were conscious efforts to strip the ball. Oregon saw things on film and wanted to take advantage of them.
|
|
|
|