Brad H -> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) (9/23/2017 1:37:37 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer I don't know if you remember what was said about Leidner last year by McShay....but they thought he was a 1st round talent before the year started. Anyone that watched the Gophers play the year before knew he wasn't that good. The draft class this past year mostly Kizer, Mahomes, etc. was supposed to be one of the worst but all those guys have done is look good.....so I have a tough time agreeing with you when you are touting your favorite schools QB as the #1 pick, just saying. Please, lets not compare Leidner to Darnold. That's a complete injustice. And for what it's worth, USC is not my favorite team. I've been rooting for the Gophers for 50 years. I had an opportunity to go to the USC game last week (for free) and turned it down. I've been a realist on USC for years. I said Mike Williams was too slow. I said Lienart had a suspect arm. I said John David Booty was awful. Admittedly, I thought Jarrett would be a decent player. As for Kizer and Mahomes, we'll wait and see. Right now Kizer has a 57% completion percentage and one touchdown against four interceptions. That's a long ways from a good start. You were high on more USC guys than that and the PAC 10 in general......Booty was a 4th to 5th round pick. How many of those guys were #1 picks? The average QB is very athletic....Wentz, Bradford, etc. are very athletic guys that look slow on the NFL field....how do you think Darnold will look? All I am saying is he has to go the Brady route....work on his foot work immensely and be able to be better than a slow dancing bear back there. He is going to scare off a lot of teams. I don't see him as the #1 pick, 1st round yes. Can he be as good as Big Ben? He'll be fine. He moves well in the pocket, has a quick release, doesn't get too emotional and is very smart. And for it's worth, I was never a believer that Barkley was going to be any good either. He was the same quarterback at USC when he left as when he arrived. He had a strong arm, but would often try to fit the ball into holes that weren't there with his big arm. And also, I wouldn't put Bradford into the athletic category. You are missing the point, I am talking more in college and how that translates to the pros. Wentz, Bradford, etc. were able to move a lot more in college than in the pro game.... Lots of people with far more experience at choosing quarterbacks with NFL picks have missed on quarterback choices in the first round of the NFL draft. I think he'll be good, but I'm only one voice.
|
|
|
|