RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Other Minnesota Sports] >> Minnesota Twins



Message


Trekgeekscott -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 8:32:34 AM)

You guys are funny.

Y'all would "have integrity" and quit and just leave 60 Million Dollars + on the table?

I seriously doubt it.

He's playing a game and getting boatloads of money. Sure it's more than he could possibly ever spend. but he can give a shitload to charity (he probably already does and get a lot of it protected from taxes that way.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 12:05:10 PM)

Sorry Pete .... No reinstatement for you!

Good call, Manfred Mann




Trekgeekscott -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 12:07:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Sorry Pete .... No reinstatement for you!

Good call, Manfred Mann



AMEN.

He knew the rules. No gambling on baseball. He knew what the punishment would be if he did. And couldn't help himself.

It didn't help that he was a total ass about it for years.




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 12:24:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Sorry Pete .... No reinstatement for you!

Good call, Manfred Mann




Did the Earth Band get consulted?




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 12:25:49 PM)

Blinded by the light.....

"Wrapped up like Pete Rose, another gambler in the night."




ewen21 -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 4:00:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

You guys are funny.

Y'all would "have integrity" and quit and just leave 60 Million Dollars + on the table?

I seriously doubt it.

He's playing a game and getting boatloads of money. Sure it's more than he could possibly ever spend. but he can give a shitload to charity (he probably already does and get a lot of it protected from taxes that way.


You read my whole post? I said if he didn't retire after another shitty year (2016) he is an idiot. In that case he'd be earning ANOTHER 23 million this year. NO matter...

Even if you didn't my whole post read this one so I can relay something personal to you to show you I am not kidding. Put aside the words "have integrity" and let me tell you about what I intend on doing over the six or seven years.

I have taught in the NY state public school system for 19 years. The magic number is 30 years. When you get there, on my step, you get the max pension. It would be nice to get that, but I am 49 and that would make me 60 at my ideal retirement age. Sounds pretty good, however, I am pretty realistic about my situation. My pay grade will be way up there in about five or six years. By that time, I will be in my mid 50s. I am not sure I still want to do it at that point because I have seen what happens to teachers in my district when they get to that point. The powers that be start finding clever ways to force you out. Furthermore, teaching isn't a piece of cake. At least not the way I see it. It requires a ton of energy to be effective and if I can't bring it then I don't want to do it anymore. Especially if they start playing games with me like they have with other teachers. I am not going to be one of those guys. I am going to leave at my peak. A lot of teachers take a "screw them" attitude and stick around just to stick it to them. That ain't going to be me. No way, no how. I am not going to hang on just to milk the max money out of the job. It's that simple. I'd rather leave money on the table and get out before things start to happen. I came to this conclusion within the last year.

My goal now is to get in 25 years and get out. I will still make a decent pension, although it will probably end up being about ten to fifteen grand less a year if I stuck around for 30. Sooner or later I am going to need to figure out what I am going to do with my life after teaching. I will hopefully have my mortgage paid down by then. And when I am done teaching I will simply move on to something else. Even if it means trading in my plan book for an orange apron at Home Depot. I will figure it out.

I am not just saying this stuff. This is what I intend on doing and it is for the reasons stated. Nothing more, nothing less. If that is laughable or ignorant then OK.....y'all can call me an idiot. I am not offended. I have heard it before. I guess I don't understand the mentality that dictates you need to milk the system just because you can. I can understand it if you are doing it to survive, but that is hardly the case with me and it is most certainly not the case with Joe Mauer.

I think Mark's summary is spot on. Why in the world would Joe need to make another dollar? He's already made 150 million. He is a shadow of what he was. I surely wouldn't continue teaching if I was diminished to the point where I was not effective. Why should I cheat the taxpayers? Call me crazy, but I honestly feel this way. Add to the Mauer scenario all this talk about "post concussion" affects. What in the world is he putting himself in peril for? That is straight up foolish.




ewen21 -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 4:11:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CPAMAN

quote:

ORIGINAL: ewen21

quote:

ORIGINAL: CPAMAN

This coming season will be the swan song for Joe Mauer. Either hit .300 or have a repeat of 2014-2015 and he should follow in Cuddyer's footsteps.


If he insists on carrying on after another shitty season he is an idiot. I'm sorry. Show some integrity and admit you've lost interest or that you simply cannot live up to the contract.

I get he's entitled to a lot of money, but there is more to life than grabbing as much money as you can get. He needs to wring every single dollar out of the Twins because the system allows him that? I would have retired by now ESPECIALLY if any of the concussion crap you hear about him as any basis in reality. If the concussions are an issue then he is a stupid person for carrying on simply because he stands to make more money. The guy has earned 150,000,000 dollars!

Call me nuts, tell my I am crazy....but if I were presented with the same circumstances Mauer now faces I would walk away. For myriad reasons.


Precisely Ralph. Mauer has a beautiful wife, two twin daughters and a boat load of money that he cannot possibly spend in his, his children, or his grandchildren's lifetime. At this point, all he stands to gain is additional income that will be paid to the IRS at the rate of 45% in federal estate tax. MN will take an additional bite of 16% of his estate on his MN assets. He is playing supposedly with the risk of a very serious concussion syndrome that could end his career during any game. He could be hit by a pitch in the head (helmet), hit by a ball as a base-runner, be subjected to a collision (with an opposing player or a catcher/2B on his own team) or dive at first base as a defensive player, or be injured via contact at any base as a base-runner. Any of these things happening could cause irreparable damage as we are being told. Yet, Joe takes on the risk that presumably is far less than playing at catcher. If given the same choice as Joe, I would choose retirement without hesitating, especially considering the results Joe has shown the past two seasons.


The underlined. Either he is or he isn't playing with a "concussion syndrome"
The effects are either there or they aren't. If they are then what in the world is he doing playing?
He saw what happened to Koskie. He saw what has gone on with Morneau. This is why when I hear the concussion excuse I roll my eyes. Retire if it's that bad. Pure and simple

If he is going to keep on playing AND have the concussion excuse floated out there then I question his sanity.
He has made 150 million dollars for heaven's sake.




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 4:19:47 PM)

Giants roll the dice with soon-to-turn 30 Cueto,with some security


The Giants have confirmed the signing of Cueto to a six-year deal, tweets Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle, though it’s still pending a physical.

ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick reports that Cueto will be guaranteed $130MM wTwitter link). The contract contains both a club option for the 2017 season and an opt-out clause after two seasons, which would give Cueto the ability to hit the free-agent market again in advance of his age-32 season. As we saw with Zack Greinke this winter, that timing can be highly beneficial to a pitcher.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 6:47:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

Giants roll the dice with soon-to-turn 30 Cueto,with some security


The Giants have confirmed the signing of Cueto to a six-year deal, tweets Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle, though it’s still pending a physical.

ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick reports that Cueto will be guaranteed $130MM wTwitter link). The contract contains both a club option for the 2017 season and an opt-out clause after two seasons, which would give Cueto the ability to hit the free-agent market again in advance of his age-32 season. As we saw with Zack Greinke this winter, that timing can be highly beneficial to a pitcher.


Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. [X(]

Speaking as a Giant admirer ....




ewen21 -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 8:25:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

Giants roll the dice with soon-to-turn 30 Cueto,with some security


The Giants have confirmed the signing of Cueto to a six-year deal, tweets Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle, though it’s still pending a physical.

ESPN’s Jerry Crasnick reports that Cueto will be guaranteed $130MM wTwitter link). The contract contains both a club option for the 2017 season and an opt-out clause after two seasons, which would give Cueto the ability to hit the free-agent market again in advance of his age-32 season. As we saw with Zack Greinke this winter, that timing can be highly beneficial to a pitcher.


Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. [X(]

Speaking as a Giant admirer ....


So as a Giant admirer you are not on board with this Cueto deal?

I'll say I am not a Cueto fan. In that brawl with the Cardinals he kicked Jason LaRue in the head.
That was low. I can never like the guy




Black 47 -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/14/2015 11:59:28 PM)

Samardja and Cueto. Two risky contracts. Admire the giants for trying, but they could get burned.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 9:32:00 AM)

It's a decent contract for the Giants to me only because he can opt out in 2 years.
One of my least-favorite players, hopefully they get the best out of him before he bolts.
Always a sideshow with him.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 1:17:18 PM)

Fascinating Pete Rose presser going on.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 1:26:11 PM)

And ...... Now the truth starts rearing its ugly head.
Still bets most days.
He's a character, plain and simple.




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 1:30:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

And ...... Now the truth starts rearing its ugly head.
Still bets most days.
He's a character, plain and simple.


That makes it an even easier call.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 1:33:02 PM)

It's life to him
Talks about loving sports, but can't watch it without betting on it.




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 3:32:31 PM)

WHEWWWWWWWW

Nationals reliever Jonathan Papelbon has the right to name 17 clubs to which he cannot be traded without his consent, and ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick reports on this year’s list.

Papelbon can block deals to the following clubs: the Athletics, Blue Jays, Brewers, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Giants, Indians, Marlins, Orioles, Phillies, Pirates, Rangers, Rockies, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Tigers, and Yankees. The league’s remaining teams can acquire the controversial veteran without his approval.




Trekgeekscott -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/15/2015 3:36:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

WHEWWWWWWWW

Nationals reliever Jonathan Papelbon has the right to name 17 clubs to which he cannot be traded without his consent, and ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick reports on this year’s list.

Papelbon can block deals to the following clubs: the Athletics, Blue Jays, Brewers, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Giants, Indians, Marlins, Orioles, Phillies, Pirates, Rangers, Rockies, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Tigers, and Yankees. The league’s remaining teams can acquire the controversial veteran without his approval.


We can still get him if he approves...

Just throwing that out there.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 9:40:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

WHEWWWWWWWW

Nationals reliever Jonathan Papelbon has the right to name 17 clubs to which he cannot be traded without his consent, and ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick reports on this year’s list.

Papelbon can block deals to the following clubs: the Athletics, Blue Jays, Brewers, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Giants, Indians, Marlins, Orioles, Phillies, Pirates, Rangers, Rockies, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Tigers, and Yankees. The league’s remaining teams can acquire the controversial veteran without his approval.


Thank god.
Mr unlikable hates us.
Makes me verrrry happy.




MDK -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 10:42:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

WHEWWWWWWWW

Nationals reliever Jonathan Papelbon has the right to name 17 clubs to which he cannot be traded without his consent, and ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick reports on this year’s list.

Papelbon can block deals to the following clubs: the Athletics, Blue Jays, Brewers, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Giants, Indians, Marlins, Orioles, Phillies, Pirates, Rangers, Rockies, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Tigers, and Yankees. The league’s remaining teams can acquire the controversial veteran without his approval.


Thank god.
Mr unlikable hates us.
Makes me verrrry happy.

Maybe having Papelbon and Perkins in the same pen, both thinking they are closers on the same team, both with bigger egos than their talent suggests, might make for some interesting clubhouse battles and provide the fans with some entertainment.




Mr. Ed -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 10:42:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MDK

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Ed

WHEWWWWWWWW

Nationals reliever Jonathan Papelbon has the right to name 17 clubs to which he cannot be traded without his consent, and ESPN.com’s Jerry Crasnick reports on this year’s list.

Papelbon can block deals to the following clubs: the Athletics, Blue Jays, Brewers, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Giants, Indians, Marlins, Orioles, Phillies, Pirates, Rangers, Rockies, Tigers, Twins, White Sox, Tigers, and Yankees. The league’s remaining teams can acquire the controversial veteran without his approval.


Thank god.
Mr unlikable hates us.
Makes me verrrry happy.

Maybe having Papelbon and Perkins in the same pen, both thinking they are closers on the same team, both with bigger egos than their talent suggests, might make for some interesting clubhouse battles and provide the fans with some entertainment.


Would give a whole new meaning to choking as a closer[:D]




twinsfan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 11:41:56 AM)

3-team trade between Reds, Dodgers and White Sox.

Todd Frazier to the White Sox.




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 12:30:16 PM)

White Sox never sit still in the off season
Props for that

Frazier will hit some bombs




SoMnFan -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 1:07:53 PM)

Bryce Harper hits FA at 26
They're speculating he could see $500 mil
The Pohlads and TR read that, and instantly seized up.




MDK -> RE: MLB General Information PT 4 (12/16/2015 1:15:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoMnFan

Bryce Harper hits FA at 26
They're speculating he could see $500 mil
The Pohlads and TR read that, and instantly seized up.


An awful lot of players owe their riches to one Curt Flood




Page: <<   < prev  272 273 [274] 275 276   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode