bohumm
Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: Hats4Bats Smith - Marsette hilights... This was what we needed. PUMPED Lengthy hilight reel.. but worth it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pR7m07KLqA Nate Stanley looks pretty good in these, as well! When I watched the Marsette Highlight I saw a player good at catching contested passes who seemed to have to catch far too many contested passes. In a highlight reel particularly shouldn't he be getting wide open? If he's willing to work and learn, he's got two very good route runners to help him get wide open to learn from. I expect Marsette to make the team and maybe even be our #3 eventually. I just am not too excited regarding him at this point. When I watched JJ highlights last year he was almost always wide open. He can return punts... so He can contribute there right away. And in the attached highlights above he was open a lot. I wouldn't expect JJ level burst onto the scene, but I do think he will be a big part of our offense eventually. Is this based on his zero punt returns at Iowa? He literally never even caught a punt in a game in college, so why why the declaration of certainty that he can contribute as a punt returner right away? I am optimistic about him and all the draft picks, as I always am because I'm a fan, but we don't have to embrace fiction or fantasy. The Iowa State RB is very fast, but for some reason couldn't get carries in college...in spite of being a very fast one-cut runner. Maybe he'll be great, maybe he'll be a poor man's Michael Bennett. Smith-Marsette has actual game production to base optimism on, but never as a punt returner. But people tout the pick based in part on his immediate impact as a punt returner (not just you). I have to say I don't get it.
|