Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: The Packers

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE: The Packers Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:17:28 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Ant bets on packers getting a home cooking call from the refs?

2 mins left, browns on the 28 of thier end down 22-24.. about 50 yards from a game winning FG..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3151
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:18:42 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Browns run for 14 then 4..

3-6 at the 44..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3152
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:19:07 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Just short…

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3153
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:20:08 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Measuring… 1:01 left..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3154
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:20:46 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Fd browns, 3 time outs.. midfield..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3155
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:21:31 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		2 nd and ten from the 50..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3156
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:22:04 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Batted down screen..

3-10..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3157
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:22:40 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Mayfield intercepted.. game over …

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3158
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:23:38 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Home cooking no DPI…

Lol

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3159
RE: The Packers - 12/25/2021 6:25:54 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Hard count for FD….penalty cleavland..

Game over…

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3160
RE: The Packers - 1/4/2022 1:34:57 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33033
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		Most of you guys remember Al Pann. He seems to be touting Aaron Rodgers for this season's MVP. I certainly hope that, with all of the baggage Rodgers brought this year - waffling about whether he'd play or not, out with covid, lying about his covid non-shot ... that no one would give him the honor of MVP.

But then, this is sports, and crappy mccrapperson stuff happens.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 3161
RE: The Packers - 1/11/2022 5:37:13 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Possible Packer playoff opponents:

Philly - Sure they can run the ball, but the officials won't let Philly win in GB just running the ball. They'll call holds on the Philly OL, force them to throw into the GB 2ndary that is getting Jaire back. Easy win for the Pack.

SF - Probably easy win for Pack

LA Rams - Stafford is familiar with losing at GB, he'll fall short

Arizona - The only team of the 4 that I feel could upset GB, only if Murray doesn't get hurt, and plays out of his mind. Is he any good in cold weather ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3162
RE: The Packers - 1/11/2022 5:41:22 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Other possible NFC Championship opponents for GB:

Dallas - Could pull an upset, there may be a revenge factor for McCarthy, could motivate him to get the team fired up, could win if the weather is nice and Prescott outduals Rodgers in a shootout

TB - Could beat GB, as long as most of their weapons are back. But they may miss Brown, and it's hard to keep beating the same team in their own stadium

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3163
RE: The Packers - 1/11/2022 6:20:29 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22985
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Possible Packer playoff opponents:

Philly - Sure they can run the ball, but the officials won't let Philly win in GB just running the ball. They'll call holds on the Philly OL, force them to throw into the GB 2ndary that is getting Jaire back. Easy win for the Pack.

SF - Probably easy win for Pack

LA Rams - Stafford is familiar with losing at GB, he'll fall short

Arizona - The only team of the 4 that I feel could upset GB, only if Murray doesn't get hurt, and plays out of his mind. Is he any good in cold weather ?

Philly and San Francisco can run the ball. I think that's the two teams Green Bay doesn't want to face.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 3164
RE: The Packers - 1/11/2022 6:45:50 PM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		The refs won't let Philly or SF win in Lambau running the ball, they'll call holding on them, forcing them to pass.

I suspect both Philly and SF will lose this week, along with the Rams.

TB, Dallas and Arizona advancing.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3165
RE: The Packers - 1/22/2022 10:10:44 PM  1 votes
thebigo


Posts: 28301
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		lmaolmaolmaolmaolmaolmaolmaolmaolmao
Post #: 3166
RE: The Packers - 1/22/2022 11:53:24 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33033
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		And now begins another offseason of Aaron Rodgers drama. At least tonight’s loss should end discussion of him being a candidate for mvp.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 3167
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 3:05:34 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		I thought MVP was determined by regular season play ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3168
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 3:12:42 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Thebigo, I was correct when SF had their 1st opportunity to score, the refs called a holding penalty, which killed that SF drive, and Jimmy helped the Pack by throwing a pick.

Now they could have stopped some more SF drives with holding penalties, but maybe they figured the Pack had it in the bag.

Or, refs are ok with games taken over by running in extreme cold, because refs want to get out of there faster. Lol


_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3169
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 3:15:45 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Some pretty funny Tweets tonight after the game.

One was something about Aaron defeated by snowflakes, cancel culture strikes again.

"Aaron had no shot". Lol

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3170
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 3:19:35 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline 		Hopefully Aaron doesn't use it as motivation, hopefully he retires, or is on another team next year.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3171
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 10:52:18 AM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33033
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		I vote that he retires. He's got one of those faces that after a while you can't stand to look at, and because of the media adoration, we've had to look at his face a ridiculous amount over the years. It would be good if he'd just go away.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 3172
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 11:14:53 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13968
Status: offline 		Yea, like maybe he could got to the jets for a year or so, then weasel his way, here, to you know.. lose in the playoffs, again, like his predecessor and mentor..

Just retire.. ya media whore..

You know he’s gonna end up as a color commentator next to Joe Suck.. right…



The man who invented the mute button is my hero…

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3173
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 11:20:40 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22985
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Possible Packer playoff opponents:

Philly - Sure they can run the ball, but the officials won't let Philly win in GB just running the ball. They'll call holds on the Philly OL, force them to throw into the GB 2ndary that is getting Jaire back. Easy win for the Pack.

SF - Probably easy win for Pack

LA Rams - Stafford is familiar with losing at GB, he'll fall short

Arizona - The only team of the 4 that I feel could upset GB, only if Murray doesn't get hurt, and plays out of his mind. Is he any good in cold weather ?

Philly and San Francisco can run the ball. I think that's the two teams Green Bay doesn't want to face.

Perhaps worth reposting!

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 3174
RE: The Packers - 1/23/2022 12:40:29 PM   
Lynn G.


Posts: 33033
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline 		You nailed it Brad.

_____________________________

Put our country back in the hands of people who actually want to do things to help everyday citizens. Elect Democrats.
Post #: 3175
Page:   <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE: The Packers Page: <<   < prev  125 126 [127] 128 129   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode