RE:The Packers

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE:The Packers

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk >> RE:The Packers

Page: << < prev 29 30 [31] 32 33 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE:The Packers - 11/30/2007 9:14:49 PM

Phil

Posts: 188
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: packerland
Status: offline

I was utterly shocked beyond belief that the ref's didn't all throw their flags once they saw that Favre was hurt. They sure did the game E.J. hit him.

Post #: 751

RE:The Packers - 12/1/2007 1:00:37 AM

Rob Viking

Posts: 2069
Joined: 8/8/2007
Status: offline

McCarthy has done a great job thus far. But he should have challenged the spot towrds the end of the game opting for a 50+ yard FG. Grant clearly had the 1st. As for Rodgers, he really impressed me with how calm he was. So much so it looked like he was at mini camp. He looked good better than Alex Smith ever has, a guy chosen 23 spots ahead of him.

Post #: 752

RE:The Packers - 12/1/2007 6:02:38 AM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Rob Viking"]McCarthy has done a great job thus far. But he should have challenged the spot towrds the end of the game opting for a 50+ yard FG. Grant clearly had the 1st. As for Rodgers, he really impressed me with how calm he was. So much so it looked like he was at mini camp. He looked good better than Alex Smith ever has, a guy chosen 23 spots ahead of him.[/quote] He didn't have a challenge left at that time. He had used them up. Rodgers is going to be a prime example of having a first round QB sit for a year or two and learn and the benefits you get from that.

Post #: 753

RE:The Packers - 12/1/2007 7:57:37 PM

Ward Peterson

Posts: 880
Joined: 8/1/2007
From: Anchorage Alaska
Status: offline

Rodgers has got to lose that Radar O'Riley hat for the post game interview. You're in the spotlight now kid.

Post #: 754

RE:The Packers - 12/1/2007 9:22:27 PM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Ward Peterson"]Rodgers has got to lose that Radar O'Riley hat for the post game interview. You're in the spotlight now kid.[/quote] Plus he needs a decent haircut. I cringed when they showed him on the sidelines. Blech.

Post #: 755

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 6:29:20 PM

David Moufang

Posts: 1177
Joined: 7/29/2007
From: Columbia Crest
Status: offline

Favre named Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year

Post #: 756

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 6:37:38 PM

John Childress

Posts: 42898
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

Why does that pic look it was photoshopped and it is really Favre on a toilet?

Post #: 757

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 6:40:38 PM

Toby Stumbo

Posts: 18455
Joined: 12/11/2006
From: Central Minnesota
Status: offline

You have some weird perversions??? :lol:

Post #: 758

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 6:41:07 PM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline

[quote="David Moufang"]Favre named Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year

[/quote] Well isn't that nice. Not even the best QB in the NFC. At BEST, 4th best QB in the NFL. Not the best player in his own division. Well it sure looks like Madden, Buck and Berman did a good job in their campaign to give the old man another worthless award.

Post #: 759

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 9:47:05 PM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

I never noticed how much the yellow helmet doesn't match the yellow pants! How could they be that far off?

Post #: 760

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 9:57:03 PM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]I never noticed how much the yellow helmet doesn't match the yellow pants! How could they be that far off?[/quote] We're talking about rural Wisconsin here. Not fashion mecca's like Milan or Paris.

Post #: 761

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 10:29:31 PM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

Bummer about the Sports Illustrated cover jinx thing Packer fans. :whistling:

Post #: 762

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 11:25:16 PM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]Bummer about the Sports Illustrated cover jinx thing Packer fans. :whistling:[/quote] Yeah, it really turned out bad for those other losers like Armstrong, Brady and the Boston Red Sox.

Post #: 763

RE:The Packers - 12/4/2007 11:37:07 PM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

Hey - I'm sure the jinx doesn't work every time. You'll be fine. Really you will. :D

Post #: 764

RE:The Packers - 12/5/2007 3:53:01 AM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]Hey - I'm sure the jinx doesn't work every time. You'll be fine. Really you will. :D[/quote] Quiet you!

Post #: 765

RE:The Packers - 12/5/2007 4:24:34 AM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

Just praying that they don't put Adrian Peterson on Madden. :whistling:

Post #: 766

RE:The Packers - 12/5/2007 6:02:19 PM

Jeff Jesser

Posts: 19458
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: online

[quote="Lynn G."]Just praying that they don't put Adrian Peterson on Madden. :whistling:[/quote] Terrible for us but it's a lock unless he turns them down (he won't IMO). :angry:

Post #: 767

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 3:54:31 AM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:

Post #: 768

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 6:22:30 AM

Todd M

Posts: 40668
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online

Nice work from the trenches Lynn. :viking:

Post #: 769

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 6:51:28 AM

Easy E

Posts: 10871
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Everytime I hear that, I think what whiny babies they are. I'd like to think Viking fans are better than that.

Post #: 770

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 3:56:23 PM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

We won't whine for five years Eric. Maybe a couple of months... ;)

Post #: 771

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 3:57:48 PM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline

[quote="Easy E"][quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Everytime I hear that, I think what whiny babies they are. I'd like to think Viking fans are better than that.[/quote] The way I see it, the hit on Adrian was bad, unfortunate and it cost us Adrian for a couple of games. We haven't lost since and Adrian came back last Sunday and looked as good as ever. No harm done. We can now move on... I just don't want to see DBs throwing their bodies at his knees like Harris did again. I am ready to move on though.

Post #: 772

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 5:12:08 PM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]I checked out a Packer forum to see how they're anticipating the game vs. Oakland this weekend. Facing Warren Sapp again has brought up the discussion of the Clifton hit, and they're once again complaining about how the hit was ruled legal, but unneccesary and dirty. So this is officially year five of complaints about that hit. I think we've got a LONG time to complain about Al Harris' tactics. :whistling:[/quote] Way to do a broad painting job on how all Packer fans are Lynn. In the 4 Packer forums I see, no one has said anything about this. But then why bother with facts when misrepresentation is so much more fun.

Post #: 773

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 5:13:50 PM

Lynn G.

Posts: 33035
Joined: 7/15/2007
Status: offline

Way to misread my post. I never said that ALL Packer fans are doing this. I certainly know my husband isn't. You may need to check YOUR facts Craig before you berate me for misrepresentation.

Post #: 774

RE:The Packers - 12/7/2007 7:40:31 PM

Cheesehead Craig

Posts: 967
Joined: 7/30/2007
From: The Frozen Tundra
Status: offline

[quote="Lynn G."]Way to misread my post. I never said that ALL Packer fans are doing this. I certainly know my husband isn't. You may need to check YOUR facts Craig before you berate me for misrepresentation.[/quote] Forget it. I apologize as I told myself I wouldn't about this garbage and only talk football.

Post #: 775