Tim Cady
Posts: 10549
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: Wonderful World
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: marty GB will NOT lose to Cleveland. Cleveland is starting a QB who only looked accurate when he had Braylon Edwards and Kellen Winslow Jr., just had to throw it in their radius and they caught it. It will be another, probably lopsided win for GB. GB ran the ball better on the Vikes, than the Vikes did on GB, and that game was in Minnesota, the next one is in Lambau. I think Peterson is playing, but hurting with a bad back. Add to that the injury he sustained against Baltimore, he probably can't wait for the bye. Then he'll probably take a pounding with Pittsburgh all geared up to knock off our 6-0 team. It's not looking good for the game at Lambau. The schedule makers did the Vikings NO favors. I think there is a 90% chance the Vikes lose at Pittsburgh, and a 60% chance they lose at Lambau. OTOH, this is the time of year where last year Favre played like a maniac and went and beat both the undefeated Titans and the high scoring Patriots on the road. So maybe he can do the same this year, rock the Steeler and Packer 2ndaries, make it easier so Peterson, Allen and others aren't so exhausted and banged up by the bye. I think you watch so much Green Bay football that you over rate them. Ryan Grant did not run well against us. I truly believe we made better adjustments against them in the 2nd half than they did. This will improve imo from game one to game two. AD did what we needed him to do as GB sold out to stop the run. They are not a good team, just because they played us close at the dome, says more about it being a divisional rival than it says about their ability. If GB was coming off a bye the week before us like they did every year for a while, I would agree that the schedule makers didn't help us. They play Detroit and Cleveland before us, just like we did before we played them the first time, They are still games you have to play and get dinged up in.
|