Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (1/13/2019 6:04:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen quote:
ORIGINAL: Pager After Saffold, it is very slim pickings. http://walterfootball.com/freeagents2019G.php Mark Glowinski might be the best available guy to hit the market. His PFF ranking is above average (69.7) But he was not good in Seattle. Took over starting job game 6 for Indy. Indy has a ton of cap space so if they want him back, they have the resources. it would take a massive overpay to get him imo. On a side note, Indy has 140M in cap space and won a playoff game, franchise QB. After Glow, a lot of average/old/or simply bad options. Our best bet might be to trade for NE Ted Karras (RFA). But he's never been a starter. Would have to probably give up a third. But desperate times..... If we can get an OL coach who can actually make individual linemen and the group better, then it is not slim pickings. Every year young players get released for a myriad of reasons. It's the job of the front office and the coaches to identify them and coach them to be better. It's the same with the draft.... John Randle, Theilen, RFA Anthony Harris, all undrafted. Or Diggs in the 5th. Yes, they are a minority percentage, but so what. Go find the players with potential, sign them, and coach them. C'mon Bill. Do you really think an Oline challenged GM is going to somehow unearth some good olineman in the non-traditional fashion? If this option was so easy, most teams would have a good oline and we wouldn't be having this discussion. And the point is, evidence suggests it is not necessarily "slim pickings" as you say. Perhaps you'd throw in the towel on young players before free agency even gets started. I say otherwise, and hope they do sign a player coming off his first contract to battle for a spot vs. an "aged veteran name or bust" methodology.
|
|
|
|