RE: General Vikes Talk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk



Message


thebigo -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 7:20:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

I don't want the bulk of my cap space tied up into two players, one who has been receiving elite QB money while not being elite ... the other a rising star at DE that is now sidelined or toothless because of neck issues.

The neck issues probably won't come to pass – that's a worst case scenario. But I'm not going to risk it or send the franchise back into cap strapped hell because Hunter signed a piss poor deal. We are just slowly oozing our way out of it.

Be responsible to the franchise (which is currently 89 CBs and no-show Hunter), make Hunter demonstrate he's healthy and then negotiate in good faith. The wink-wink-nudge-nudge that Brez and Spiels exchanged behind Hunter while he inked his deal tells you they new the deal was not going to last.


What wink-wink-nudge-nudge was that? Not sure why they would be wink-winking-nudge-nudging if they thought the contract would be a problem in short order.




thebigo -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 7:23:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.


Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 7:42:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.


Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Correctamundo.




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 8:39:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 9:01:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?




thebigo -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 9:42:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

In 2018, he signed a 5 year contract that covers years 2019-2023.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 9:44:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

In 2018, he signed a 5 year contract that covers years 2019-2023.


They paid him in 2018.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 10:09:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]

Not a gold brick, but did us no good.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 10:11:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

We are talking about his contract. He is two years into it with one year of play.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 10:20:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

We are talking about his contract. He is two years into it with one year of play.


Well since they paid him $17.4 million in 2018 I guess by your way of thinking he’s actually been paid for three years but only played one.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/11/2021 10:59:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.




bohumm -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 12:25:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.

For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem?




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 7:11:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.

For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem?

Inmates then run the asylum. When a star player doesn't like the coach it's easier for the owner to fire the coach than trade the player. It often creates insubordination.

There's a reason why the NFL is king. The root of it is nonguaranteed contracts.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 7:15:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

We are talking about his contract. He is two years into it with one year of play.


Well since they paid him $17.4 million in 2018 I guess by your way of thinking he’s actually been paid for three years but only played one.

my guess is the new contract/extension didn't kick in until 2019 as that teams usually do lock up good players a year before their rookie deal runs out. However, they still have to run the course of the rookie deal in it's entirety. Might even be a mandatory NFL rule.




bohumm -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 7:35:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.

For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem?

Inmates then run the asylum. When a star player doesn't like the coach it's easier for the owner to fire the coach than trade the player. It often creates insubordination.

There's a reason why the NFL is king. The root of it is nonguaranteed contracts.

The inmates? Plantation mentality much, Bill?

Name a time one player got a coach fired.




Bill Jandro -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 7:44:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.

For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem?

Inmates then run the asylum. When a star player doesn't like the coach it's easier for the owner to fire the coach than trade the player. It often creates insubordination.

There's a reason why the NFL is king. The root of it is nonguaranteed contracts.

The inmates? Plantation mentality much, Bill?

Name a time one player got a coach fired.

Just a phrase or saying. No disrespect to anybody or whatever.

Coaches don't get fired in the NFL if there is a rift between him and one player. That's my point. The player goes. However, it happens in the NBA. LeBron had at least one if not two coaches ousted in his career.




kgdabom -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 8:13:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

We are talking about his contract. He is two years into it with one year of play.


Well since they paid him $17.4 million in 2018 I guess by your way of thinking he’s actually been paid for three years but only played one.

He's got huge compensation for one year of play. Yes.




Mark Anderson -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 8:21:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.



FWIW, I hate the albatross that is Kirk Cousins contract.

Do you blame Kirk? Do you feel like the players should just appreciate whatever the owners are willing to give them while the owners get cost certainty?

Until they guarantee 100% of all player contracts, the owners are perpetrating an injustice, IMO. The have guaranteed revenue streams when they enter into contracts; why shouldn't the players? And how can you blame someone for fighting against that injustice?

Are you familiar with the NBA and MLB? They have guaranteed contracts and it creates a lot of different problems.

For whom? The players keep all of the money from their contracts, the teams make money, the franchises appreciate in value....what's the problem?

Inmates then run the asylum. When a star player doesn't like the coach it's easier for the owner to fire the coach than trade the player. It often creates insubordination.

There's a reason why the NFL is king. The root of it is nonguaranteed contracts.

The inmates? Plantation mentality much, Bill?

Name a time one player got a coach fired.

Just a phrase or saying. No disrespect to anybody or whatever.

Coaches don't get fired in the NFL if there is a rift between him and one player. That's my point. The player goes. However, it happens in the NBA. LeBron had at least one if not two coaches ousted in his career.

NFL players definitely love the NBA and MLB model. Guaranteed contracts.

Players had their chance to make a stand but they voted for the last agreement. High end players mostly voted "NO" because they can afford a Strike. The majority took the deal because it gave them a little more $$$ and no work stoppage.




Tom Sykes -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 8:41:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

I don't want the bulk of my cap space tied up into two players, one who has been receiving elite QB money while not being elite ... the other a rising star at DE that is now sidelined or toothless because of neck issues.

The neck issues probably won't come to pass – that's a worst case scenario. But I'm not going to risk it or send the franchise back into cap strapped hell because Hunter signed a piss poor deal. We are just slowly oozing our way out of it.

Be responsible to the franchise (which is currently 89 CBs and no-show Hunter), make Hunter demonstrate he's healthy and then negotiate in good faith. The wink-wink-nudge-nudge that Brez and Spiels exchanged behind Hunter while he inked his deal tells you they new the deal was not going to last.


What wink-wink-nudge-nudge was that? Not sure why they would be wink-winking-nudge-nudging if they thought the contract would be a problem in short order.

I was in the room. or posing a hypothetical.

My guess is that Brez knows what he’s doing. And recognizes that 5 yr deals are fine for the middle swath of nfl players ... but that those deals are short-lived for young premier players rising to elite status.

Everybody else does ... don’t you?




TJSweens -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 9:29:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]

Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

Exactly. People are grinding on him being paid while he was injured and that couldn't be more irrelevant. When players go on IR they get paid. Barr missed 14 games last year. He still got paid. It's in the CBA. It has nothing to do with contract talks.




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 10:04:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]

Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

Exactly. People are grinding on him being paid while he was injured and that couldn't be more irrelevant. When players go on IR they get paid. Barr missed 14 games last year. He still got paid. It's in the CBA. It has nothing to do with contract talks.


Don't make blanket generalizations that start to put posters in opposing bins. You need to realize three days of posts about Hunter are not all going to be straightforward "contract talks" posts w/o any deviation. For example, showing how much Hunter received for not playing in reply to a post claiming woe are the players suffering all the burden all the time. And to THAT point, Pierce opted out and received $350,000. Not a bad gig if you can get it.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 10:12:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]


Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

We are talking about his contract. He is two years into it with one year of play.


Well since they paid him $17.4 million in 2018 I guess by your way of thinking he’s actually been paid for three years but only played one.

my guess is the new contract/extension didn't kick in until 2019 as that teams usually do lock up good players a year before their rookie deal runs out. However, they still have to run the course of the rookie deal in it's entirety. Might even be a mandatory NFL rule.


Yes. Because it would be foolish to let an elite talent reach free agency clubs usually extend them a year early. When this happens, because all of the signing bonus goes to the player immediately yet counts against the cap in a prorated fashion, the number of years of the extension PLUS the remaining year of the existing deal all come together to be the entire deal. A player with one year left on an existing contract (like Hunter) signs an extension for x amount of years (in Hunter's case five years). The five-year extension and the one remaining year combine to ACT LIKE a six-year contract. That's why Hunter got paid $17.4 million in 2018 instead of $1.9 million. His cap hit in 2018 was $5.6 million instead of $1.9 million because a pro-rated amount of his signing bonus COUNTED IN 2018.

He is in the third year of a six-year contract that included a five-year extension. The Vikings were wise to lock him up early but the deal ended up too favorable to the club as Hunter is one of the most elite defensive players in the league and still young - really young. He is woefully underpaid for his level of talent and production and the defensive guru's schemes fall apart without his pass rush.




ratoppenheimer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 10:13:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

I hope none of the people who are saying that Hunter is being a dick or even unreasonable for wanting to capture the value he's exceeded are people who also get mad at Kirk for having an all-guaranteed contract. If the NFL would just have two-way guarantees on all contracts (instead of just the guarantee for the team), which they can easily do with their public subsidies and monster revenues, all of this would be avoided.

Players have guaranteed money. It's called a signing bonus. Any agent worth shit will get the the player their fair value in the signing bonus. So far I think Hunter has been more than fairly compensated for one season of play.

Hunter signed his current deal in2018.


2 years of pay, one year of play.

Yes, the gold brick took a year off. [&o]

Once again - he signed his extension in 2018. If we’re insisting on this goofy x years of pay x years of play thingy then it’s two years of play, three years of pay. Two seasons of elite play. Can we count his first three years where he made under $2 million total for all three years combined?

Exactly. People are grinding on him being paid while he was injured and that couldn't be more irrelevant. When players go on IR they get paid. Barr missed 14 games last year. He still got paid. It's in the CBA. It has nothing to do with contract talks.


i think that it's somewhat relevant when a player is demanding to renegotiate a five-year contract after two years...ask yourself this; if hunter had been injured for both of the first two years of his present deal and had not played a single down under his current contract; would you agree that the Vikings should pay him more money in the 3rd year than the contract he signed stipulates?....




Bill Johanesen -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 10:18:30 AM)

Hunter is free to hold out and not do his job, just as his employer is free to fine him, collect a pro-rated portion of previously paid guaranteed money, and/or 'fire' him. The so-called contract is about transfer of funds and relatively meaningless from the employment angle.




David F. -> RE: General Vikes Talk (6/12/2021 10:29:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Hunter is free to hold out and not do his job, just as his employer is free to fine him, collect a pro-rated portion of previously paid guaranteed money, and/or 'fire' him. The so-called contract is about transfer of funds and relatively meaningless from the employment angle.


The term employer is just as meaningless. The NFL business model is an atrocity. Find me another industry where every franchise greatly succeeds financially in every city every year. The business model is to take the fans money, distribute some of it to the players and keep the rest of it for themselves and then repeat. (TV money is also just the fans' money as they drive the ratings that drives the advertising revenue) Why is there even any need for owners? A ten year old could smile for the camera at media events and hire a GM and coach from a list of ten or twelve familiar names. Oh dear did they guess wrong? So do 2/3rds of the existing owners - all the time.

But god forbid a player try to act in a business manner for his own benefit. What a selfish loser that guy is! Go do your job! What? People with commensurate skills and production are making double what you make? Too bad! Now excuse me, I have forty-three dumptrucks full of cash I need to find a place for.




Page: <<   < prev  105 106 [107] 108 109   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode