Phil Riewer -> RE: General Vikes Talk (1/17/2023 2:40:55 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: David Levine quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: TJSweens Every year that the Vikings hovered just either side of .500, there seemed to be those who would say that the Vikings were just handful of plays away from being a playoff team. This year the Vikings won 13 games and you could make the argument that the Vikings were several key plays away from being a 3 win team. I was at the Patriots game and in that one alone, the Vikings had great fortune. The referees missed a huge hold on Nwangwu's kick return for a TD. Ham had his arms around the man he was blocking and both hands were full of jersey. Nwangwu ran right past him as he was doing it. How the refs missed that one, I will never know. After that the Pats helped the Vikes game winning drive with two personal foul penalties. Why bring this up? You can't look to next year and say if they just make just an incremental improvement in certain areas, they will x amount of games and make the playoffs again. The Vikings could have an incrementally better team on paper next year and come away with half as many wins. They have to look at this in terms of what are the components of a real contender and how do we put that together. This defense is old, slow as molasses in January and has the wrong players for the scheme. The offense featured guys like Cook and Thielen who are visibly losing steps. The line continues to be held together with two good blockers, bailing wire and chewing gum. The long and short of it is that there are too many holes to fill in one off season. They need to start the process of a full rebuild now. Cut Thielen, Smith, Cook, Kendricks, Hicks, Ham +1 (I am more on the full rebuild on the def side as many of the cuts are on that side of the ball) May have to include not resigning Dalvin Tomlinson plus cutting/trading Hunter and ZED..... So who is left on defense? Who is any good on defense now? Asamoah, Evans, Cine, Booth, Bynum, Phillips, Jones, Lynch, Tonga, Metullus, Blacklock, Boyd, Bullard, Dye, Otomewo, Vilain, Wonnum, and Dantzler (may be gone too). That's my point. How far does all this money go when you need 6 or 8 starters on defense? S Cine and Bynum Metullus backup CB Evans and Booth (Dantzler, Boyd, Shelley) LB Dye LB Asamoah DL Phillips Tonga Bullard and Lynch Otomewo OLB Vilain/Wonnum Jones It isn't as bare as you are suggesting and it isn't much worse than the starters of 2022 before the draft, FA, and UDFA periods They have added CB and LB to future contracts already. That's even uglier than what I was picturing... Just because you like guys or know their names makes them starters? How many of those guys have an actual history of playing well as starters? On paper its significantly worse than 2022... I don't agree. I think the LB are better, faster for one. Jones and Wonnum can rush. Again that is before the draft, FA, and UDFA and trades. You can't be serious. Asamoah Dye an improvement over Kendricks Hunt? Last offseason, people in here (including you) were calling Kendricks near-elite and Hunt a solid FA value. Asamoah and Dye are not automatically better because the other guys looked bad this year. Booth, Cine? You have consistently over time made these kind of pronouncements ... We are a long way from knowing what the defense is going to look like going into camp but the line-up in your post would not only be 10 time worse than this year, it would be the first known suicide by defensive ineptitude. It changed in less than a year...you can see that neither are even near elite now...little to no drop off to Dye and the rookie. My opinion changed after the Philly game (Sanders), then verified with Dallas game (Pollard) GB game and finally the NYG game (Barkley). If you have a defense designed where he has to defend the middle of the field or cover RBs you are better off with a younger version.
|
|
|
|