Prescott -> RE: Vikes Water Cooler Thread (5/30/2014 2:02:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro quote:
ORIGINAL: Prescott quote:
ORIGINAL: hagar quote:
ORIGINAL: Prescott quote:
ORIGINAL: hagar quote:
ORIGINAL: Todd M Who cares more, Native Americans or white guilt Americans? With poverty, substance abuse, schooling atrocities...is it on their list even? You tell me that Native Americans, generally, HATE any reference to the Washington Redskins and I'll accept that. Should have never been done but does it really matter now? I can only speak for people that I know and have asked. My wife is slightly less than 50% native American. A combination of Potawatomi and Blackfoot, but, a bit more Potawatomi. Her dad was born on the Potawatomi reservation and has free housing, medical services and other services if he chooses to take advantage of them by living on the reservation. These are also available to my wife , my children and even my grandkids if any of them ever wanted to take advantage of them someday. I just asked my wife right now and have asked my father in law several times over the years about being offended by the Redskins name. The answer has always been that they could care less and it doesn't bother them at all. They just consider themselves Americans and wish other people could just get over the past and move on with their lives the way they have. That's a healthy way to view life. But - this is up to you obviously - ask her how she would feel if someone decided they would start referring to her, personally, whenever they saw here, as a redskin. Maybe it's the same answer, but for many it's not. I totally get why native Americans don't worry about this, especially if they aren't fans of the team or the NFL. Most of us have enough to worry about without making this a cause, but at the same time, if a new franchise were started we wouldn't put up with 'the blackies' or the 'wetbacks' or the 'slanteyes'. It's not on a par with world hunger, or even putting food on your kid's table, but at this point, with so many people asking the owner to change it, it's a no brainer. Good idea Prescott. She's asleep now and I'm on my way to bed, but, I will ask her that tomorrow and let you know what she says. She wondered why I was asking about it earlier this evening and I said that it's been in the news recently again. I know that friends of hers have called her Pocahontas occasionally in a joking manner and she laughs and tells them that she is an Indian princess, which she technically is because of her bloodlines. I'm curious what she'll say about it if it were a name given to a team today, so I'll let you know. On a less serious note if we start a new franchise I'm good with Beer Guzzling Krauts. Being one, I think we could kick ass. Same here. And those are the ones (like 'fighting irish') that get brought up, however they're slightly positive, and not quite comparable. More like "goose stepping krauts" or maybe 'gassing germans' or 'drunken irish' or 'stupid pollack'. Redskins just doesn't have any positive connotations. It's maybe not quite like calling a black person the n word, but it's pretty close to calling the vietnamese gooks, or chinese chinks. No reason for it. Guilt or no guilt. Yet it also does not contain any negative connotations. Such as "stupid pollacks" or some of your other examples. I'm not offended by it but I'm not a Native American either. i simply don't think it is derogotory or negative. Sure, like chink and gook don't have any negative connotations? At the base of it, they're all just words. You could say that darkie isn't 'negative', just descriptive. But in actual use, of course it has negative connotations, and it's why no one actually calls native Americans "redskins" any longer.
|
|
|
|