RE:NFL News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> General NFL Talk



Message


Duane Sampson -> RE:NFL News (11/8/2007 7:31:28 PM)

Shula should watch what he says John Czarnecki FOXSports.com, Updated 13 hours ago Don Shula is a Hall of Fame coach, but his argument this week that an asterisk should be slapped on New England's current season if it ends in perfection belongs in the Hall of Shame. Shula is desperately trying to protect the image of his 1972 Miami Dolphins, the NFL's only team to have a perfect season. In the past, Shula has gotten upset whenever someone has pointed out that maybe the Steelers of the 1970s or the 49ers of the '80s or even the Cowboys of the early '90s were actually a better team than his unbeaten Dolphins, a team that was very good, but had few challengers that season, beating only one team with a winning record during the regular season. In case you missed it, here's what Shula told the New York Daily News: "The Spygate thing has diminished what they've accomplished. You would hate to have that attached to your accomplishments. They've got it. Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,000 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found. "I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds' home run record. I guess it will be noted that the Patriots were fined and a No.1 draft choice was taken away during that year of accomplishment. The sad thing is Tom Brady looks so good, it doesn't look like he needs any help." A lot has been written about Bill Belichick's elaborate videotaping of other team's defensive signals since the Patriots were caught with an employee on the sidelines during the first game of the season, filming the defensive signals from the Jets' coaching staff. But for what it's worth, the Patriots were never able to gain any advantage from that tape, because it was confiscated at halftime. And given that the team was severely disciplined for its behavior, it's a relatively safe assumption that Belichick hasn't resumed the most controversial taping program outside of the Bush administration. Which means — for those of you keeping track — the Patriots didn't gain an unfair advantage during any of their nine wins so far this season. Now whether Belichick and his staff may have benefited from similar tactics during New England's three Super Bowl runs is certainly open to debate, but what the team may have done in past seasons has no bearing on what he and his players are accomplishing this season. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who needed to protect the integrity of his sport, handed down the stiffest penalties in league history on the Patriots and Belichick: $750,000 in fines and the loss of a first-round draft pick. And there's a reason why. The league's popularity is intertwined with gambling from $5 office pools to the billion dollar Las Vegas sports books. If millions of fans thought the games were crooked, they probably wouldn't bet or ultimately watch the action on television. But Goodell's disciplinary tactics notwithstanding, there is absolutely no proof to suggest that this New England season is tainted by what Belichick may have done in the past seasons. Heck, the Patriots aren't alone in stealing signs on game days or any year for that matter. For Shula or any other coach to suggest otherwise, well, it's a complete crock. The Patriots are definitely motivated to win this season because of the allegations that their past championships are now somehow tainted. Shula's words simply add more fuel to drive. If the Patriots do go 16-0 in the regular season and win the Super Bowl to finish 19-0, Shula's words will come back to haunt him.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/8/2007 7:38:45 PM)

I wonder if the NFL could do a "Scared Straight" with guys like that? You know, take them to visit Lawrence Phillips, Clarett, Carruth, etc. I guess at this age they probably would just ignore it.




Easy E -> RE:NFL News (11/8/2007 11:59:48 PM)

[quote="Duane Sampson"]Shula should watch what he says John Czarnecki FOXSports.com, Updated 13 hours ago Don Shula is a Hall of Fame coach, but his argument this week that an asterisk should be slapped on New England's current season if it ends in perfection belongs in the Hall of Shame. Shula is desperately trying to protect the image of his 1972 Miami Dolphins, the NFL's only team to have a perfect season. In the past, Shula has gotten upset whenever someone has pointed out that maybe the Steelers of the 1970s or the 49ers of the '80s or even the Cowboys of the early '90s were actually a better team than his unbeaten Dolphins, a team that was very good, but had few challengers that season, beating only one team with a winning record during the regular season. In case you missed it, here's what Shula told the New York Daily News: "The Spygate thing has diminished what they've accomplished. You would hate to have that attached to your accomplishments. They've got it. Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,000 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found. "I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds' home run record. I guess it will be noted that the Patriots were fined and a No.1 draft choice was taken away during that year of accomplishment. The sad thing is Tom Brady looks so good, it doesn't look like he needs any help." A lot has been written about Bill Belichick's elaborate videotaping of other team's defensive signals since the Patriots were caught with an employee on the sidelines during the first game of the season, filming the defensive signals from the Jets' coaching staff. But for what it's worth, the Patriots were never able to gain any advantage from that tape, because it was confiscated at halftime. And given that the team was severely disciplined for its behavior, it's a relatively safe assumption that Belichick hasn't resumed the most controversial taping program outside of the Bush administration. Which means — for those of you keeping track — the Patriots didn't gain an unfair advantage during any of their nine wins so far this season. Now whether Belichick and his staff may have benefited from similar tactics during New England's three Super Bowl runs is certainly open to debate, but what the team may have done in past seasons has no bearing on what he and his players are accomplishing this season. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who needed to protect the integrity of his sport, handed down the stiffest penalties in league history on the Patriots and Belichick: $750,000 in fines and the loss of a first-round draft pick. And there's a reason why. The league's popularity is intertwined with gambling from $5 office pools to the billion dollar Las Vegas sports books. If millions of fans thought the games were crooked, they probably wouldn't bet or ultimately watch the action on television. But Goodell's disciplinary tactics notwithstanding, there is absolutely no proof to suggest that this New England season is tainted by what Belichick may have done in the past seasons. Heck, the Patriots aren't alone in stealing signs on game days or any year for that matter. For Shula or any other coach to suggest otherwise, well, it's a complete crock. The Patriots are definitely motivated to win this season because of the allegations that their past championships are now somehow tainted. Shula's words simply add more fuel to drive. If the Patriots do go 16-0 in the regular season and win the Super Bowl to finish 19-0, Shula's words will come back to haunt him.[/quote] There is as much proof that Bill's cheating ways of acquiring illegal videotape of his opponents signals over the years has tainted the Patriots and affected the outcome of game AT LEAST as much as the accusation of Barry Bonds taking substances tainted his performance. My problem is that the same wonks who delight with giggling cackles over an asteriks being on the record ball by Bonds absolutely freak out at the suggestion that cheating and being caught should be treated the same way by a slimeball coach. It's almost comical the amount of hypocrisy. Bill's defenders go "eh, the Patriots were so good that they didn't need to cheat, they would have won anyway".... this despite the fact that the Patriots won 3 of the closest Super Bowls ever and were caught red handed. Meanwhile, Bonds was so good without the juice that he was a multiple MVP, clear HOFer and best player in baseball. But that doesn't matter, they say, when it's a white football coach and not a black baseball player. Or, how about the funny "Well, lots of other teams in the NFL are probably doing the same thing". Despite the fact that Bill was caught redhanded, and that no other team has, and that Bill B is the absolute most paranoid coach on the planet, all of which makes it likely that he is either the only one or the only one doing it to such an extent.... NO ONE ELSE HAS BEEN CAUGHT! And he has been caught doing it over the years, and likely has done it forever. Meanwhile, even those that are positive that Bonds cheated admit he probably did so over a 2-3 year period. And tons and tons of his peers are STILL doing it and getting caught. But that doesn't matter when it comes to Barry and his cheating. When it's Bill, it's a valid excuse. Finally, when the NFL did get wind of this, what did they do? Get the tapes, do an internal investigation, and then quickly destroy the tapes and seal the results of the investigation. Can't have that stuff public, it's private and dealt with. This leads to the rather obvious conclusion that while receiving the harshest penalty for a team ever, the actual results of the investigation and the tapes themselves were so radioactive and damaging to the integrity of the game that they could never see the light of day. It isn't hard to imagine Bill B having an incredible library and truly knowing just what the other team was calling. It almost becomes the necessary conclusion, in fact. Meanwhile, despite having supposedly legally sealed records leaked to the public, and an army of federal prosecutors out to get him, they haven't been able to pin a single thing on Barry. And yet one is the poster boy for all that is bad with sports, and one is riding the recent wave of everything that is good. Where is the disconnect? I mean, the turning a blind eye has gotten so out of hand that when a legendary coach like Don Shula, who is a great person and contributed more to the NFL than perhaps any other single coach, has the "audacity" to basically say "Well, I'd congratulated Bill if they go undefeated, but you do have to remember that they received the biggest penalty ever and that might taint it a little" people lose their minds. A decent player like Vrabel drags Shula's name through the mud and eveyone thinks it's cool, because Don speaks the truth? We really are screwed up. The same people who hate Bonds, obviously hate him not for what he did, but for perception, while those same people love Bill despite what he did, and for what? Perception.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 12:14:04 AM)

Holy Double Standard Batman! The amount of venom thrown at Bonds is way out of line. Where was all this venom for McGwire?




djskillz -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 12:43:26 AM)

[quote="John Childress"]Holy Double Standard Batman! The amount of venom thrown at Bonds is way out of line. Where was all this venom for McGwire?[/quote] Agreed. That's well said E, but I don't really think it is a huge deal in EITHER case. The Pats are great without signals, and Bonds is great without roids.




Lynn G. -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 2:30:37 AM)

[quote="John Childress"]Holy Double Standard Batman! The amount of venom thrown at Bonds is way out of line. Where was all this venom for McGwire?[/quote] I honestly think that Bonds has gotten way more criticism in large part because he's known to be a jerk. McGwire was, by all accounts, considered a good teammate, a nice guy, a community guy, etc. - and Bonds was known to be a lousy teammate, a locker room cancer and a jerk in an interview. It may not be fair, but media people are human too, and it's human nature to give the benefit of the doubt to the nice guy over the jerk.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 6:50:47 AM)

[quote="Lynn G."][quote="John Childress"]Holy Double Standard Batman! The amount of venom thrown at Bonds is way out of line. Where was all this venom for McGwire?[/quote] I honestly think that Bonds has gotten way more criticism in large part because he's known to be a jerk. McGwire was, by all accounts, considered a good teammate, a nice guy, a community guy, etc. - and Bonds was known to be a lousy teammate, a locker room cancer and a jerk in an interview. It may not be fair, but media people are human too, and it's human nature to give the benefit of the doubt to the nice guy over the jerk.[/quote] I agree somewhat I would ammend that to say that McGwire knew to nice to the media and pretend to be a good guy




Guest -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 7:14:16 AM)

But the reality is that we don't truly know these guys, and neither does the media. It's a game that both sides play. There are plenty of Colts fans that are completely unaware of what Peyton did in the locker room at Knoxville. Now he's the poster boy of the NFL.




djskillz -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 7:18:41 AM)

[quote="Pete C"]But the reality is that we don't truly know these guys, and neither does the media. It's a game that both sides play. There are plenty of Colts fans that are completely unaware of what Peyton did in the locker room at Knoxville. Now he's the poster boy of the NFL.[/quote] Very well said, Pete. I've heard from some people first hand that Peyton is an absolute jerk/prima donna. I really don't put much stock into what the media wants us to believe about guys. Heck, even with Bonds, obviously there are are reports of his poor character, but I've also talked to people that have spent an hour or two talking to him and hated him, and have completely changed their views. Who knows what to believe with these guys. We've talked about this at various times/on various threads in these boards; It's one thing to like these guys as athletes, but for the most part, I wouldn't trust my daughter/sister with any of them.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 8:00:29 AM)

[quote="Pete C"]But the reality is that we don't truly know these guys, and neither does the media. It's a game that both sides play. There are plenty of Colts fans that are completely unaware of what Peyton did in the locker room at Knoxville. Now he's the poster boy of the NFL.[/quote] My point exactly Peyton Manning Ray Lewis Heck, for years some people thought OJ was a good guy I seriously doubt Mark McGwire was a good guy, he was a White guy so they didn't have a problem with him juicing up




Thomas O. Eliason -> Sad but true (11/9/2007 10:24:29 AM)

But they sure busted out Sammy Sosa, didn't they ? It's called a double-standard my friend. I'm sure it's not the first you've seen, and I'm not exactly proud of our (collective) history. Nevertheless, the media crams their newest hero down our throats incessantly, giving Him opportunities to make us laugh and relate to their (ahem) humanity. Truth be known, most of these guys are the definition of egomaniacal misanthropic narcissists, lacking the slightest miniscule prayer of a conscience or concern for their fellow human beings. We should feel bad (and pray) for these misguided souls but instead, most people hold them in abject reverence. Especially Brad H. who is about as misguided as any cell-of-awareness can possibly be ! . .




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 4:01:18 PM)

good points The way that star athletes are treated it is a wonder that any of them turn out to be good people - and many do. I watch the treatment the QB gets on my son's team already and it is amazing.




Steve Lentz -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 5:37:59 PM)

I can't see the comparison between Manning and Lewis. Wow.




Thomas O. Eliason -> Apples to pomegranates (11/9/2007 5:58:54 PM)

The only comparison is all the media attention SL. Manning's a self-important douchebag, but not a criminal.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 7:01:53 PM)

Perhaps you guys didn't see the story on Manning sexually assaulting a female co-ed?
quote:

Go all the way back into Manning's previous football incarnation, when he was a god-like superstar QB at the University of Tennessee. It is on that campus where his karmic problems may have started. A young lady by the name of Jamie Ann Naughright from New Jersey did not come from a well-known family like Manning. The first person in her family to attend college, she graduated from UT with a degree in exercise physiology and a master's and doctorate in health education. After working for the Lady Vols athletic teams, Naughright was transferred to men's athletics. In fact, she became the first female associate trainer in the university's history. This is where her intersection with the great QB started. Manning, already an All-SEC quarterback, was one of the players under Naughright's care. Trying to play a juvenile practical joke, Manning pulled down his pants to moon a fellow athlete, cross country runner Malcolm Saxon. Naughright just happened to be in eye's length of "the moon," according to Manning. Naughright and Saxon tell a far more graphic story. In fact, in a 2002 letter to Manning, shared with the court in Tennessee, Saxon, the intended target of the mooning, wrote: "Bro, you have tons of class, but you have shown no mercy or grace to this lady who was on her knees seeing if you had a stress fracture." Naughright and Saxon contend that the mooning was actually an incident of far greater vulgarity. Naughright described herself as examining Manning's foot to see why he was in pain. She was positioned on her knees behind him, when, entirely unprovoked, Manning pulled down his pants and sat on her head and face. In a deposition, Naughright was more specific about the incident, but let's just say that it was much more than just a mooning. Within hours, Naughright reported this to the Sexual Assault Crisis Center in Knoxville. She ended up the villain at the university, and ultimately agreed to leave Tennessee in a settlement that paid her $300,000. That should have been the end of this sordid tale, and maybe the beginning of a better karmic tale for Manning. But, Manning couldn't leave it alone. By 1998, Naughright seemed to have gotten back on track at Florida Southern College. She had become the director of the Athletic Training Educational Program and an assistant professor. According to papers in a later filing, Naughright was described as being a highly respected program director, and her supervisor Kathleen Benn, recommended Naughright for an exemplary salary increase, the highest increase in the school's promotional system. At this time, Manning and his father, Archie, co-authored "Manning: A Father, His Sons, and a Football Legacy." This book, for some reason, led to yet another square-off between Manning and Naughright. Manning chose to take total exception to Naughright and Saxon's account of what happened back in Knoxville. While not mentioning her by name, Manning says, "I did it [the mooning] thinking the trainer wasn't where she would see. Even when she did see, it seemed like something she'd have laughed at, considering the environment, or shrugged off as harmless. Crude maybe, but harmless." Naughright, who Manning characterized in the book as having a "vulgar mouth," was suddenly back in a limelight she didn't deserve and hadn't asked for. Copies of the book were all over the campus where she worked and her supervisor turned on her with a vengeance. Benn had praised Naughright and recommended the highest raise possible, but was suddenly referring to her as "demanding, hostile and vindictive." Just as suddenly, Naughright was demoted and removed as the program coordinator. What Manning said in his book wreaked havoc a second time on her life and wrecked her career again. This time Naughright proceeded legally against both Mannings, Peyton and Archie, and the publisher, Harper Collins, for defamation of character.
http://www.pressboxonline.com/story.cfm?ID=1451




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 7:04:52 PM)

quote:

Peyton Manning, son of the legendary Archie Manning, is a NFL star with the Indianapolis Colts. Even before he made that leap in his career, he was a Heisman trophy contender. While at the University of Tennessee he became the subject of a very serious sexual harassment suit against both him and the University. A female trainer, after suffering his continual acts of sexual harassment, had enough when Manning exposed his naked buttocks to her and nearly sat on her face. The media remained low key, and Manning was able to settle his case with very little fanfare. Manning's behavior, which bordered on the legal definition of rape, was minimized and labeled as "a lapse in judgment." By the time the media finished polishing up Manning's bad conduct, those who happened to read the small print of the sports page, would be under the impression that he'd merely mooned her. The incident was made to have been simply a childish prank misconstrued by the public. And then there's the double standard on substance abuse. Joe Montana, one of the most famous quarterbacks of all time used illegal drugs for several years. There were allegations at various times in his career. There was even proof. Yet the sports world and mainstream media didn't report on the story until he issued public denials. Even when he later admitted to his demons during an interview with CBS, there was little fanfare. Instead the media reported that he'd entered a rehab program because of back pain. The implication of such reporting is that his problems with drugs were a result of something that happened to him, rather than something he did. However Darryl Strawberry's admission into rehab and Lawrence Taylor's candid discussion about his drug use on 60 Minutes were splayed in the media as athletes who were out of control. The media made it impossible for either of them to be victims of circumstance. Their drug use had to be a demonstration of their lack of control. The escapades of former Green Bay Packer Mark Chamura were documented throughout the sports media outlets, but never made it to the mainstream media. Perhaps they didn't think it newsworthy that a major NFL athlete was at a post-prom party with high school children. It's interesting that the media hounds didn't think the public would want to know how he played drinking games with high school kids, or that his teenage babysitter accused him of raping her in the bathroom. More than likely the reason that the story didn't splash on front pages is that it would be too hard to clean up such a mess. It's hard to put a good spin on a grown man enticing underage drinking and committing sexual assault. It's hard to make it look like the mistake he claims it was.
http://www.yaaams.org/editorials/articles/kobe_bryant.php
quote:

Conflicting versions Manning claimed in his book that, while in the training room, in response to a track athlete who made a remark, Manning dropped his shorts to moon the athlete. "I did it thinking the trainer wasn't where she would see. ... Even when she did, it seemed like something she'd have laughed at, considering the environment, or shrugged off as harmless. Crude maybe, but harmless." Naughright and her lawyer provided a different version of events. In a court filing, her lawyer wrote that she was examining Manning to see why Manning was having pain in one of his feet and was crouched behind him when "entirely unprovoked, Peyton Manning decided to pull down his shorts and sit on Dr. Naughright's head and face." As Naughright described it in a deposition entered into the court record: "It was the gluteus maximus, the rectum, the testicles and the area in between the testicles. And all that was on my face when I pushed him up. ... To get leverage, I took my head out to push him up and off." The court record includes a letter to Manning from former Tennessee cross country runner Malcolm Saxon, who Manning said was the intended target of the mooning. Written in December 2002, the letter reads, in part: "Bro, you have tons of class, but you have shown no mercy or grace to this lady who was on her knees seeing if you had a stress fracture. ... "She was minding her own business when your book came out. Peyton, the way I see it, at this point, you are going to take a hit either way, if you settle out of court or if it goes to court. You might as well maintain some dignity and admit to what happened. ... Your celebrity doesn't mean you can treat folks that way. ... Do the right thing here." In a court filing, Naughright's lawyer says his client reported the incident within hours to the Sexual Assault Crisis Center in Knoxville. According to a filing by Naughright's lawyer, Manning at first didn't call the incident a "mooning." The lawyer wrote that Manning "denied" that anything had occurred between him and Naughright. An associate trainer, Mike Rollo, was never a witness to the incident, but he got involved because he tried to intervene to help Manning come up with a story. In a deposition cited in the filing, Rollo was asked if Naughright had ever referred to the incident as mooning. "No, unfortunately, I think that tagging is with me," Rollo answered. The next question: "In other words, you were the first person to characterize it as a mooning, is that correct?" "Unfortunately." Reached by telephone Monday, Rollo referred questions to Tennessee's lawyers, who didn't return telephone calls Monday. In court documents, Naughright's lawyer wrote that after the incident with Manning, Manning taunted her by re-enacting his conduct on two occasions. The document also said that Manning called her a "bitch" during a drug test, when he snatched a pen, which he was supposed to use to sign and date the specimen, and threw it across the room.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/colts/2003-11-04-manning-suit_x.htm




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 10:18:05 PM)

[quote="Steve Lentz"]I can't see the comparison between Manning and Lewis. Wow.[/quote] Do you see the comparison now?




Lynn G. -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 10:37:46 PM)

As appalling as that story is (and I remember reading it a couple of years ago), I think I'd hesitate to put his deed in the same category as Ray Lewis'.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 10:42:39 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]As appalling as that story is (and I remember reading it a couple of years ago), I think I'd hesitate to put his deed in the same category as Ray Lewis'.[/quote] Why? You don't consider sexual assault a major crime or you don't believe the victim? Ray Lewis didn't kill anyone. He was an accessory afer the fact. I would say that is in the same league, if you believe her story.




Lynn G. -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 10:45:20 PM)

I honestly don't have an opinion as to who is telling the truth. I don't have enough information to make that call. But no, I don't put it in the same category as accessory to murder.




John Childress -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 11:05:46 PM)

[quote="Lynn G."]I honestly don't have an opinion as to who is telling the truth. I don't have enough information to make that call. But no, I don't put it in the same category as accessory to murder.[/quote] You are missing the words "after the fact" in Ray Lewis' case. The crime was already committed and he helped cover it up. That is easily as bad as actively sexually assaulting a woman. But people will have their double standards.




Lynn G. -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 11:12:42 PM)

John, You continue to assign motives for people here and it has gotten pretty ridiculous. It doesn't have anything to do with double standards. In one case a person LOST THEIR LIFE! If you don't understand the significance of that, talk to their family. And just quit ASSUMING things about how some of us feel. You hate it when people do it to you - yet you are one of the guiltiest parties when it comes to that. Stop it.




Cheesehead Craig -> RE:NFL News (11/9/2007 11:48:06 PM)

Kum Ba Yah :rocker:




Lynn G. -> RE:NFL News (11/10/2007 12:09:30 AM)

:yeahthat:




Duane Sampson -> RE:NFL News (11/10/2007 7:49:04 AM)

Midseason awards: No Pats allowed Jay Glazer FOXSports.com, Updated 3 hours ago The NFL has crossed the midway point, which only means one thing: me and every other sports writer out there get to fill up space with our obligatory midseason awards. In my version, however, there will be a twist. No Patriots! They aren't allowed in this column. Before the Bostonians throw me overboard like a crate of tea, let me explain. If we include the Patriots in this column it will be nothing more than another New England piece. Heck people, I just wrote on Sunday that we can put a check in the win column for the rest of the year. There is no question in my mind that Brady and Co. go undefeated. I honestly do not believe they lose a game until 2008. The only question I have is where the 2007 Patriots team ranks on the all-time list. They make a normal midseason awards column boring, even cliche. Brady, MVP. Belichick, Coach of the Year. Moss, Comeback Player of the Year. Vrabel, all-everything award. Blah, blah, blah ... BORING! So in an effort to let the rest of the league in on the fun, I'm afraid we're going to have to give the Pats a bye in this one. With that said, envelope please ... MVP: Packers QB Brett Favre. It's between Favre and Cowboys QB Tony Romo, although I'd even give Eli Manning some love in this category. However, in the end, Favre is doing it with a horrific running game. He's not making the same mistakes he has in recent years and the ol' gunslinger isn't looking so old these days. Offensive Player of the Year: Vikings RB Adrian Peterson. His fullback, Tony Richardson, has blocked for Marcus Allen, Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson yet this week told me he's never, ever seen anything like the Vikings rookie running back. "The crazy thing is, he stays after every day and puts in all this extra work," said the Pro Bowl fullback. "I don't think he'll hit that wall because he's always pushing himself to do extra things. Personally, I've never seen anything like him and that's not a knock on anybody else. It's just that you've already seen what he can do and he still has so much room to grow." Rookie of the Year: Seriously? Do I really need to pick this? See above. Defensive Player of the Year: Colts safety Bob Sanders. No one player on any defensive unit helps his team more than Sanders. When he was hurt a year ago, that team couldn't stop anyone on the ground. The game he came back, it was a whole different story. Against the run, Sanders doesn't just make plays, he makes them when the Colts need them most. Packers DE Aaron Kampman, Lions DT Shaun Rogers, Titans DT Albert Haynesworth and Chiefs DE Jared Allen get some votes as well. Coach of the Year: Packers head coach Mike McCarthy. The Pack is 7-1, and that's without trading for Randy Moss. The Packers have the youngest team in the NFL for the second year in a row, but McCarthy has young and old completely bought into his program. Giants head coach Tom Coughlin and Browns head coach Romeo Crennel need some love here as well for coming back from the dead and Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin garners some votes. Mr. Underrated: Titans DE Kyle Vanden Bosch. May be one of my favorite players in this league to watch. Plays like a fighter who simply refuses to stop stalking his prey. He keeps coming and coming and coming. The Titans defense is the main reason that team has the third-best record in the conference. He has five sacks and one forced fumble, but it's the constant pressure against the run and pass that has opened things up for others on that Titans defense. Are You Kidding Me Award: Bears returner Devin Hester. People still kick to this kid? Are you kidding me? Coaches haven't figured out that kicking the ball out of bounds is a strategic must against the Bears yet? Are you kidding me? Rising Star Award: Giants DE Osi Umenyiora. He's long been overshadowed by Michael Strahan and Tiki Barber but folks, this kid is hilarious. One of the greatest secrets in the league when it comes to interviews. Absolutely hysterical and he's still learning from Strahan, which means he's still not reached his potential as a player. He'll be the next great quote in this league and the next great pass rusher. Comeback Player of the Year: Lions DT Shaun Rogers. Only played in six games a year ago but nobody has made a bigger impact on that surprising Lions defense than Rogers. The man is a beast and unstoppable when he wants to be. The Lions lead the league in takeaways and the destruction that Rogers causes goes a long way toward that. Comebacker Player of the Century: Vinny Testaverde. Just think, he's played with everyone from Steve Smith and Tom Brady to Red Grange and Jim Thorpe. That whole addition of the facemask must have been really strange for him to get used to. Breakout Player: Tie. Browns QB Derek Anderson and WR Braylon Edwards. Edwards is fourth in the NFL in receiving with 736 yards. This from a guy who the team tried to trade in the off-season. Actually, unload is probably more of an appropriate term. Anderson has certainly bucked the odds and now the odds are that he's going to get one heck of a nice, fat check. Most Disappointing Team: Dolphins. At least the Rams have the excuse of being decimated by injuries early. They lost their best player in Orlando Pace, along with Marc Bulger, Steven Jackson and Richie Incognito very early on. Nobody can come back from that. The Dolphins, however, had their core in place for a while. Plus, unlike the Rams who pretty much sat tight in free agency, Miami was aggressive this off-season, bringing in Trent Green and Joey Porter. They are so bad it's like they did something bad in a previous life and are being punished for it now. Most Improved: Chiefs DE Jared Allen. Spent nearly every free day this entire off-season training in mixed martial arts with some yahoo who pens an Internet column for a very, very reputable web site. That's right people, I'm taking full credit for every single one of Allen's league-leading sacks. Working in the cage dropped 20 pounds off his frame, increased his hand speed and his burst off the line is twice as fast as a year ago. Most Disappointing Trend: The running backs' lack of production. Steven Jackson, Larry Johnson, Frank Gore, LaDainian Tomlinson, Rudi Johnson, Shaun Alexander ... talk about screwing up your fantasy draft. Football fans can check out "Inside the Helmet: Life As A Sunday Afternoon Warrior," by Michael Strahan with Jay Glazer -- a hard-hitting revelatory portrait of America's most popular sport.




Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode