Easy E -> RE:NFL News (11/8/2007 11:59:48 PM)
|
[quote="Duane Sampson"]Shula should watch what he says John Czarnecki FOXSports.com, Updated 13 hours ago Don Shula is a Hall of Fame coach, but his argument this week that an asterisk should be slapped on New England's current season if it ends in perfection belongs in the Hall of Shame. Shula is desperately trying to protect the image of his 1972 Miami Dolphins, the NFL's only team to have a perfect season. In the past, Shula has gotten upset whenever someone has pointed out that maybe the Steelers of the 1970s or the 49ers of the '80s or even the Cowboys of the early '90s were actually a better team than his unbeaten Dolphins, a team that was very good, but had few challengers that season, beating only one team with a winning record during the regular season. In case you missed it, here's what Shula told the New York Daily News: "The Spygate thing has diminished what they've accomplished. You would hate to have that attached to your accomplishments. They've got it. Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,000 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found. "I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds' home run record. I guess it will be noted that the Patriots were fined and a No.1 draft choice was taken away during that year of accomplishment. The sad thing is Tom Brady looks so good, it doesn't look like he needs any help." A lot has been written about Bill Belichick's elaborate videotaping of other team's defensive signals since the Patriots were caught with an employee on the sidelines during the first game of the season, filming the defensive signals from the Jets' coaching staff. But for what it's worth, the Patriots were never able to gain any advantage from that tape, because it was confiscated at halftime. And given that the team was severely disciplined for its behavior, it's a relatively safe assumption that Belichick hasn't resumed the most controversial taping program outside of the Bush administration. Which means — for those of you keeping track — the Patriots didn't gain an unfair advantage during any of their nine wins so far this season. Now whether Belichick and his staff may have benefited from similar tactics during New England's three Super Bowl runs is certainly open to debate, but what the team may have done in past seasons has no bearing on what he and his players are accomplishing this season. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, who needed to protect the integrity of his sport, handed down the stiffest penalties in league history on the Patriots and Belichick: $750,000 in fines and the loss of a first-round draft pick. And there's a reason why. The league's popularity is intertwined with gambling from $5 office pools to the billion dollar Las Vegas sports books. If millions of fans thought the games were crooked, they probably wouldn't bet or ultimately watch the action on television. But Goodell's disciplinary tactics notwithstanding, there is absolutely no proof to suggest that this New England season is tainted by what Belichick may have done in the past seasons. Heck, the Patriots aren't alone in stealing signs on game days or any year for that matter. For Shula or any other coach to suggest otherwise, well, it's a complete crock. The Patriots are definitely motivated to win this season because of the allegations that their past championships are now somehow tainted. Shula's words simply add more fuel to drive. If the Patriots do go 16-0 in the regular season and win the Super Bowl to finish 19-0, Shula's words will come back to haunt him.[/quote] There is as much proof that Bill's cheating ways of acquiring illegal videotape of his opponents signals over the years has tainted the Patriots and affected the outcome of game AT LEAST as much as the accusation of Barry Bonds taking substances tainted his performance. My problem is that the same wonks who delight with giggling cackles over an asteriks being on the record ball by Bonds absolutely freak out at the suggestion that cheating and being caught should be treated the same way by a slimeball coach. It's almost comical the amount of hypocrisy. Bill's defenders go "eh, the Patriots were so good that they didn't need to cheat, they would have won anyway".... this despite the fact that the Patriots won 3 of the closest Super Bowls ever and were caught red handed. Meanwhile, Bonds was so good without the juice that he was a multiple MVP, clear HOFer and best player in baseball. But that doesn't matter, they say, when it's a white football coach and not a black baseball player. Or, how about the funny "Well, lots of other teams in the NFL are probably doing the same thing". Despite the fact that Bill was caught redhanded, and that no other team has, and that Bill B is the absolute most paranoid coach on the planet, all of which makes it likely that he is either the only one or the only one doing it to such an extent.... NO ONE ELSE HAS BEEN CAUGHT! And he has been caught doing it over the years, and likely has done it forever. Meanwhile, even those that are positive that Bonds cheated admit he probably did so over a 2-3 year period. And tons and tons of his peers are STILL doing it and getting caught. But that doesn't matter when it comes to Barry and his cheating. When it's Bill, it's a valid excuse. Finally, when the NFL did get wind of this, what did they do? Get the tapes, do an internal investigation, and then quickly destroy the tapes and seal the results of the investigation. Can't have that stuff public, it's private and dealt with. This leads to the rather obvious conclusion that while receiving the harshest penalty for a team ever, the actual results of the investigation and the tapes themselves were so radioactive and damaging to the integrity of the game that they could never see the light of day. It isn't hard to imagine Bill B having an incredible library and truly knowing just what the other team was calling. It almost becomes the necessary conclusion, in fact. Meanwhile, despite having supposedly legally sealed records leaked to the public, and an army of federal prosecutors out to get him, they haven't been able to pin a single thing on Barry. And yet one is the poster boy for all that is bad with sports, and one is riding the recent wave of everything that is good. Where is the disconnect? I mean, the turning a blind eye has gotten so out of hand that when a legendary coach like Don Shula, who is a great person and contributed more to the NFL than perhaps any other single coach, has the "audacity" to basically say "Well, I'd congratulated Bill if they go undefeated, but you do have to remember that they received the biggest penalty ever and that might taint it a little" people lose their minds. A decent player like Vrabel drags Shula's name through the mud and eveyone thinks it's cool, because Don speaks the truth? We really are screwed up. The same people who hate Bonds, obviously hate him not for what he did, but for perception, while those same people love Bill despite what he did, and for what? Perception.
|
|
|
|