Guest -> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) (1/7/2015 11:42:32 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: djskillz I guess I just don't put a lot of stock in 1-2 games. The best team doesn't always win, which is what makes sports great. Hell, baseball has 7-game series, but does anyone really believe the Giants and Royals were the best teams this year? I think very few would say that. But they won when they had to and deserve credit for it. Was UConn the best team in college basketball last year? No way. But they played extremely well when it mattered and won those 6 critical games in the tourney. Similarly, I don't think one game means Alabama wasn't the best team. I think if they play the playoff 100 times Alabama probably comes out on top 50 of them and the rest are split with mainly Oregon/OSU. Of course, that still leaves a 50% chance the other way, as we saw. In the NFL this year, I highly doubt the best team will win it all. It may happen, but a lot of times it doesn't. That's what makes sports great. It's not decided on paper. Doesn't diminish what those teams were. IMO. And this in no way takes away from what these teams accomplish. Oregon or OSU will win it all and play the best when it matters most, in the championship. Just like those '87 and '91 Twins teams probably weren't the best teams in either of those years, but no one is ever taking those titles away from us. It's not a subjective argument. The team that beats the other team is better. That game, or that season. Hence the old "they were better than us today' line. They don't get to play 100 times. I know you feel strongly about it but it's not the way it is. I do believe the Giants were the best team in baseball this year. Aside from the trophy that have to prove it, they had pitching, defense and they won it without long balls. They were the best team. As were your Twins on their championship years. UConn ... they rose to the top. When you are at the top, you are the best.
|
|
|
|