hagar
Posts: 2757
Joined: 3/3/2014
From: fresburg, ca
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: hagar quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: hagar quote:
ORIGINAL: thebigo quote:
ORIGINAL: hagar quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro It's easy to hate on kickers/punters Locke certainly isn't anything more than average if that. But I'm ok with giving him another season. However, he needs to do better as does Walsh. Both have had their ups and downs. I think both are going to look a whole lot better working the majority of their games indoors. They'll have to or Locke will be gone. Walsh will be a tough call based on his regular season FG%. In net average Locke was 18th in 2013, 22nd in 2014, and 31st in 2015. In 2015 Vikings opponents had a .2 yard better net than Locke. Locke needs to be more consistent without a doubt and bringing in competition would be great in my opinion. Let's see what he can do when someone is trying to take his job. That being said, 7+ inches less net average than our opponents over the season is meaningless. I wouldn't say it's meaningless, it just means it kind of a wash. As far as that stat will tell you. There are other factors that can skew that statistic. I'm just saying that as far as stats go, picking up 7 inches of field position on an exchange of punts is meaningless. Though to some people the all important stat is that the opponents had a better net no matter how small. Marcus Sherels was the #12 punt returner in the league in 2015. With him we still were bested by the opposition. A quick check of our opposition will show you that we played a big chunk of the bottom half of the league in punting last year also. We lost a contest that by luck was tilted in our favor to begin with. With even mediocre performance from our special teams we should have been in the top half of the league by default. Then the coach has the ignorance/audacity (pick one) to say his guy outperformed the competition which is straight up false. Bias or not this is exactly what happened. What contest are you referring to? That one up there I bolded that someone else posted earlier. Gotcha. Whoever posted that must be an idiot. However I tend to agree with him and yes your bias is showing through.
|