Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: 2023 NFL Draft

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2023 NFL Draft Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:22:32 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28301
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

Hrrmmm.... Ringo, Phillips, Rush, Smith & Hodges Tomlinson all rated higher.
Blackmon did have a really good year last year... we'll see how much Kwesi knows his business.

From CBS:
Mekhi Blackmon CB, USC
Height: 5-11, Weight: 178
Chippy, sticky outside CB with a tiny, spindly frame. Always around the football. Was a big-time sleeper. Can play inside or on the perimeter. Great pick. (Chris Trapasso) A-

Maybe he'll be the Wayne Gretzky of the NFL.
Post #: 551
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:22:54 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2365
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
PFF review

DB – MEKHI BLACKMON, USC
One cornerback in this draft class was in the top five of PFF coverage grade both for man coverage and zone coverage, Blackmon. At 5-foot-11 and 178 pounds, Blackmon is undersized, but he has the tenacity to offset that. He allowed a 46.1 passer rating into his coverage last season and just 47.6% of passes thrown his way to be caught. Blackmon’s game is exceptionally entertaining, and he plays much bigger than he actually is. He could be an absolute steal during the draft.

But feel free to doom and gloom...
Post #: 552
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:23:39 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Every year this comes up.

There could be 20 compensatory picks in a round and we trade into the last one. Come hell or highwater, by god we stayed in the round even though value wise we ended up with the 20th pick in the NEXT round.

What matters is how many slots you move, the round is pretty much irrelevant when the comp picks start. However, the NFL calls it the 3rd, so it's the 3rd.


It matters when teams are using value charts, which they do. Unlike you, they likely factor in adjusting them especially as the pool of comp picks become an ever larger factor as the rounds go on. It's stuff over your head.

KMA


Yep, you have nothing. Just don't trying assigning value to any trade from the 3rd round on and you'll be ok.



Not sure what you're getting at. Every pick has a value, the round is irrelevant. That being said, it doesn't appear that Queasy got good value here.

He gave up a pick worth 155 and received 92+24.6+1.1= 117.7

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Right, I don't get trade chart value, right... Like I said before the round doesn't matter as much as the # of spots you move, but it's still the 3rd round.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 553
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:24:00 PM   
DavidAOlson

 

Posts: 18931
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: online
Heckuvan over-the-shoulder catch.

https://youtu.be/XsY4lm2qUn0?t=42

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice
Post #: 554
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:28:34 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

Hrrmmm.... Ringo, Phillips, Rush, Smith & Hodges Tomlinson all rated higher.
Blackmon did have a really good year last year... we'll see how much Kwesi knows his business.

From CBS:
Mekhi Blackmon CB, USC
Height: 5-11, Weight: 178
Chippy, sticky outside CB with a tiny, spindly frame. Always around the football. Was a big-time sleeper. Can play inside or on the perimeter. Great pick. (Chris Trapasso) A-

Maybe he'll be the Wayne Gretzky of the NFL.

Or Allen Iverson of the NBA
Post #: 555
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:32:33 PM   
lyle chabot

 

Posts: 748
Joined: 7/26/2007
Status: offline
well 2 years in a row I have been disappointed in the Vikes draft. Not sure what they are thinking but they are more knowledgeable than I am. I was getting tired of seeing the Pukers Bears and Lions picking all over the place and we picked TWICE. I wanted Hooker and of course he goes to a division rival........
Post #: 556
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:34:11 PM   
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
He looks a little Duke Shelley’ish. Maybe we should’ve kept Duke and drafted DL.
Post #: 557
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:37:12 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Every year this comes up.

There could be 20 compensatory picks in a round and we trade into the last one. Come hell or highwater, by god we stayed in the round even though value wise we ended up with the 20th pick in the NEXT round.

What matters is how many slots you move, the round is pretty much irrelevant when the comp picks start. However, the NFL calls it the 3rd, so it's the 3rd.


It matters when teams are using value charts, which they do. Unlike you, they likely factor in adjusting them especially as the pool of comp picks become an ever larger factor as the rounds go on. It's stuff over your head.

KMA


Yep, you have nothing. Just don't trying assigning value to any trade from the 3rd round on and you'll be ok.



Not sure what you're getting at. Every pick has a value, the round is irrelevant. That being said, it doesn't appear that Queasy got good value here.

He gave up a pick worth 155 and received 92+24.6+1.1= 117.7

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Right, I don't get trade chart value, right... Like I said before the round doesn't matter as much as the # of spots you move, but it's still the 3rd round.



Don't know how simple I can make it: value wise, like when you access a value chart w/o comp picks to see the points on a trade, you'd have to look at the 7th spot in the 4th to see how much it's worth.

By not doing that, every pick does NOT have a value. The comp picks have to be factored in. Everything slips backwards.

The chart you reference, which I use and have posted here twice the last couple of days, does factor the comp picks in. Many don't. If they don't it's a 4th, point wise.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2023 10:38:14 PM >
Post #: 558
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:40:25 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

PFF review

DB – MEKHI BLACKMON, USC
One cornerback in this draft class was in the top five of PFF coverage grade both for man coverage and zone coverage, Blackmon. At 5-foot-11 and 178 pounds, Blackmon is undersized, but he has the tenacity to offset that. He allowed a 46.1 passer rating into his coverage last season and just 47.6% of passes thrown his way to be caught. Blackmon’s game is exceptionally entertaining, and he plays much bigger than he actually is. He could be an absolute steal during the draft.

But feel free to doom and gloom...


Read he had a great Senior Bowl, not sure if it was practice/drills and/or the game.
Post #: 559
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:40:38 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
Below are the picks between our original at 87 and ours at the END OF THE 3RD, pick 102.

Who did you want in this range more than the CB we took. Notice, no CB's were taken in this range, so if CB was our goal, in the 3rd, we achieved it without getting sniped and picked up additional draft capital.

Names I've heard of and would've considered. DeMarvion Overshown LB Texas went 90. Dorian Williams LB Tulane went 91, Broderic Martin DT Western Kentucky went 96 and Siaki Ika DT Baylor wend 98. The rest of them weren't likely on our board at all.

I personally would have leaned toward one of the behemoth DT's and try and plug the middle up, but I really don't know much about any of them.

24 (87) Ji'Ayir Brown Penn State S
25 (88) Tank Bigsby Auburn RB
26 (89) Kobie Turner Wake Forest DT
27 (90) DeMarvion Overshown Texas ILB
28 (91) Dorian Williams Tulane ILB
29 (92) Wanya Morris Oklahoma OT
30 (93) Darnell Washington Georgia TE
31 (94) Michael Wilson Stanford WR
32 (95) Jordan Battle Alabama S
33 (96) Brodric Martin Western Kentucky DT
34 (97) Ricky Stromberg Arkansas C
35 (98)Siaki Ika Baylor DT
36 (99) Jake Moody Michigan PK
37 (100) Tre Tucker Cincinnati WR
38 (101) Cameron Latu Alabama TE
39 (102) Mekhi Blackmon USC CB

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 560
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:41:14 PM   
The Happy Norseman

 

Posts: 758
Joined: 12/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

PFF review

DB – MEKHI BLACKMON, USC
One cornerback in this draft class was in the top five of PFF coverage grade both for man coverage and zone coverage, Blackmon. At 5-foot-11 and 178 pounds, Blackmon is undersized, but he has the tenacity to offset that. He allowed a 46.1 passer rating into his coverage last season and just 47.6% of passes thrown his way to be caught. Blackmon’s game is exceptionally entertaining, and he plays much bigger than he actually is. He could be an absolute steal during the draft.

But feel free to doom and gloom...


And the last thing I’m worried about is a kid’s weight coming out of college. The Vikings will get him up to 190-195lbs. Flores covets flexibility in his defensive players. Sounds like Blackmon fits the bill.

_____________________________

If the Cubs can win the World Series...
Post #: 561
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:43:59 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lyle chabot

well 2 years in a row I have been disappointed in the Vikes draft. Not sure what they are thinking but they are more knowledgeable than I am. I was getting tired of seeing the Pukers Bears and Lions picking all over the place and we picked TWICE. I wanted Hooker and of course he goes to a division rival........


Are you disappointed in the Vikes that the Div rivals picked more than the normal amount? Did you factor in Hock re us picking twice?

Points wise, even trading all our picks after #23 would not have got us to where Hooker was taken. What was your plan?

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2023 10:48:27 PM >
Post #: 562
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:44:04 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Every year this comes up.

There could be 20 compensatory picks in a round and we trade into the last one. Come hell or highwater, by god we stayed in the round even though value wise we ended up with the 20th pick in the NEXT round.

What matters is how many slots you move, the round is pretty much irrelevant when the comp picks start. However, the NFL calls it the 3rd, so it's the 3rd.


It matters when teams are using value charts, which they do. Unlike you, they likely factor in adjusting them especially as the pool of comp picks become an ever larger factor as the rounds go on. It's stuff over your head.

KMA


Yep, you have nothing. Just don't trying assigning value to any trade from the 3rd round on and you'll be ok.



Not sure what you're getting at. Every pick has a value, the round is irrelevant. That being said, it doesn't appear that Queasy got good value here.

He gave up a pick worth 155 and received 92+24.6+1.1= 117.7

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Right, I don't get trade chart value, right... Like I said before the round doesn't matter as much as the # of spots you move, but it's still the 3rd round.



Don't know how simple I can make it: value wise, like when you access a value chart w/o comp picks to see the points on a trade, you'd have to look at the 7th spot in the 4th to see how much it's worth.

By not doing that, every pick does NOT have a value. The comp picks have to be factored in. Everything slips backwards.

The chart you reference, which I use and have posted here twice the last couple of days, does factor the comp picks in. Many don't. If they don't it's a 4th, point wise.

I don't know how simple I can make it. The round doesn't matter in the value it's the # of slots between picks. However when talking about which round a pick is in, I will defer to the terminology used by the GD league that runs the draft, not your interpretation of what you think it should be.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 563
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 10:50:38 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Every year this comes up.

There could be 20 compensatory picks in a round and we trade into the last one. Come hell or highwater, by god we stayed in the round even though value wise we ended up with the 20th pick in the NEXT round.

What matters is how many slots you move, the round is pretty much irrelevant when the comp picks start. However, the NFL calls it the 3rd, so it's the 3rd.


It matters when teams are using value charts, which they do. Unlike you, they likely factor in adjusting them especially as the pool of comp picks become an ever larger factor as the rounds go on. It's stuff over your head.

KMA


Yep, you have nothing. Just don't trying assigning value to any trade from the 3rd round on and you'll be ok.



Not sure what you're getting at. Every pick has a value, the round is irrelevant. That being said, it doesn't appear that Queasy got good value here.

He gave up a pick worth 155 and received 92+24.6+1.1= 117.7

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Right, I don't get trade chart value, right... Like I said before the round doesn't matter as much as the # of spots you move, but it's still the 3rd round.



Don't know how simple I can make it: value wise, like when you access a value chart w/o comp picks to see the points on a trade, you'd have to look at the 7th spot in the 4th to see how much it's worth.

By not doing that, every pick does NOT have a value. The comp picks have to be factored in. Everything slips backwards.

The chart you reference, which I use and have posted here twice the last couple of days, does factor the comp picks in. Many don't. If they don't it's a 4th, point wise.

I don't know how simple I can make it. The round doesn't matter in the value it's the # of slots between picks. However when talking about which round a pick is in, I will defer to the terminology used by the GD league that runs the draft, not your interpretation of what you think it should be.


You keep bringing up the round, which is meaningless from the 3rd on unless the comp picks are factored in. I am talking value, and use a round-equivalent.

Why does it bother you so much that I say the #39 pick is the equivalent of the 7th pick in the 4th?

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2023 10:53:17 PM >
Post #: 564
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:01:01 PM   
Chris Olson


Posts: 6797
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
Status: offline
I'm good with this draft so far...

all the grown men crying over the GM not conforming to their hopes is just weird

We got maybe the best WR in the draft...and it was definitely a need spot, despite probably having more pressing need on D

We got Hock for the 2nd rounder

And we got a sneaky good, under the radar cb , plus a couple extra picks

characterize it how you will, but, imo, so far so good, based on where we were picking and the number of picks we had
Post #: 565
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:02:19 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
Why do you have to say it's the 7th pick of the 4th when the 7th pick of the 4th belongs to Las Vegas and is worth 76 pts. Our pick at the end of the 3rd was worth 92.

It would be more accurate to just say its the 87th pick vs the 102nd pick vs the 109th pick when the round is irrelevant, but when someone says we traded out of the 3rd round that is factually incorrect. 102 is the last pick of the 3rd round. Sorry Bill.

I get where you might want to talk like you are if someone isn't using the correct board, but you'd be smarter to just direct them to the correct board and quit all the mental gymnastics, you aren't as good at it as you think.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 566
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:03:25 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
So far this draft has allowed us to acquire:

Addison
Hockenson
Blackmon
Post #: 567
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:06:27 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40598
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Picked 2 to 3 rounds early = under the radar.
Post #: 568
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:07:15 PM  2 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

Why do you have to say it's the 7th pick of the 4th when the 7th pick of the 4th belongs to Las Vegas and is worth 76 pts. Our pick at the end of the 3rd was worth 92.

It would be more accurate to just say its the 87th pick vs the 102nd pick vs the 109th pick when the round is irrelevant, but when someone says we traded out of the 3rd round that is factually incorrect. 102 is the last pick of the 3rd round. Sorry Bill.

I get where you might want to talk like you are if someone isn't using the correct board, but you'd be smarter to just direct them to the correct board and quit all the mental gymnastics, you aren't as good at it as you think.


I don't think you read. ONCE AGAIN, the chart you have factored all that in. Many don't.

It is NOT more accurate to just say the pick number if someone is using the standard 1-32 boilerplate chart. That would not be accurate, value wise.

Of course the pick number is key if everything is factored in.

And it is factually true that we traded out of a normal (32 pick) third round. Which I mentioned. And that sent you into a "IDGAF" tizzy.

Direct them to the correct board? Again, I provided it twice the last two days. Well before you did.

And I'm ten times better at it than you are.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/28/2023 11:14:44 PM >
Post #: 569
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:08:13 PM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40598
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
We'll have one impactful guy when it's all said and done. Until he's sitting out or demanding a trade after 3 years...
Post #: 570
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/28/2023 11:41:49 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28301
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

He looks a little Duke Shelley’ish. Maybe we should’ve kept Duke and drafted DL.

Good point
Post #: 571
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/29/2023 12:25:56 AM   
marty


Posts: 13047
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Yet another teammate of Caleb Williams.

I hope they have a plan to moving up and getting Caleb next year.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 572
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/29/2023 12:59:38 AM   
Jeff Allen

 

Posts: 8660
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Twin Cities
Status: offline
Dummies here don't realize that no CB's were taken from 87 to 102. Complain about the pick if you want, but the trade got us two more picks in the draft so stop with the hyperbole.
Post #: 573
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/29/2023 2:37:58 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris Olson

I'm good with this draft so far...

all the grown men crying over the GM not conforming to their hopes is just weird

We got maybe the best WR in the draft...and it was definitely a need spot, despite probably having more pressing need on D

We got Hock for the 2nd rounder

And we got a sneaky good, under the radar cb , plus a couple extra picks

characterize it how you will, but, imo, so far so good, based on where we were picking and the number of picks we had

Its weird that you perceive it that way ...

Your mindset must be narrow and simplistic if people expressing different opinions have to be dismissed that way.
Post #: 574
RE: 2023 NFL Draft - 4/29/2023 2:57:42 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

So far this draft has allowed us to acquire:

Addison
Hockenson
Blackmon

Agree that's the bottomline so far.
Post #: 575
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2023 NFL Draft Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode