Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  135 136 [137] 138 139   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 2:24:41 PM   
Mark C. Johnson

 

Posts: 1191
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline
Lack of concentration and focus. Slow starts to each game. Is it a coaching thing with the drops and fumbles?
Post #: 3401
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 2:28:32 PM   
Mark C. Johnson

 

Posts: 1191
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline
For me, it's just evaluating the players we have. See how they perform during the season to determine who to keep. I thought Wonnum had one of the best games I've seen him play. So, there's some development there.
Post #: 3402
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 2:30:43 PM   
Mark C. Johnson

 

Posts: 1191
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline
Fields? No way. Don't want him. He's not accurate at all and that's a cardinal sin in the NFL. In my opinion, accuracy can not be taught. You either can place the ball where you want to or you can not. He can't.
Post #: 3403
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 2:37:58 PM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19464
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
I'm also starting to come around on the "re-up" Hunter idea that's been floated around. He's been great this year and we have no other options. You aren't getting 2 DE's, extensions to Darrisaw and JJ and figure out the QB situation in 1 window.
Post #: 3404
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 2:47:08 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark C. Johnson

This isn't a playoff caliber team. Not sure we have much any other team would trade for outside of Hunter or Jefferson. They will not trade Jefferson during the season and most likely not after it. I don't think any other team wants Cousins. I think he'd really struggle if he had to go to a new situation mid-season...he seems like a guy who likes to stay in his daily routine...not a guy that can handle sudden change.



The two OTs are the only other players I can think of that are worth something, but I don't want to see them get traded.
Post #: 3405
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 3:27:44 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark C. Johnson
This isn't a playoff caliber team. Not sure we have much any other team would trade for outside of Hunter or Jefferson. They will not trade Jefferson during the season and most likely not after it. I don't think any other team wants Cousins. I think he'd really struggle if he had to go to a new situation mid-season...he seems like a guy who likes to stay in his daily routine...not a guy that can handle sudden change.

The two OTs are the only other players I can think of that are worth something, but I don't want to see them get traded.


Rumor mill has KJ, Hunter, and Smith to a lesser extent of interest Hicks and Cleveland. Hunter is the only one probably getting us a higher pick, Cleveland has sneaky value if teams think he can play tackle.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/17/2023 3:30:00 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3406
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:01:42 PM  1 votes
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!
Post #: 3407
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:05:57 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 3408
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:14:55 PM   
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
With Kirk being such a planning type and memorizer, I'm amazed they don't employ a play call wrist band that many QBs have. It's loaded with plays for various down and distances and each play can be called with any number of variants or looks. That would be a visual aid to narrow down the list of viable plays KFC has to think about and maybe it would facilitate a better dialog with KOC rather than Kirk having to cover his earholes and listen to the 20 sentence play call coming in from the sideline after w/e process KOC uses to choose a play.
Post #: 3409
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:19:04 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Maybe just upgrade to some decent earbuds

Noise shoul not be an issue?
Post #: 3410
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:19:51 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
First, Tolstoy barks out his latest version of War and Peace that often takes 10 seconds.
Then KFC has to re-vomit it and they have to get to the LOS.
Then they need at least a ten second pad for KFC to go through his initial gyrations, have a guard look back and reset (sometimes twice!), then KFC to finish with the same dual set of fake hand gestures.
Then the C seems to be on his own passive-aggressive schedule thinking I'll hike the ball when I damn please.
Post #: 3411
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:20:17 PM   
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.



That's fair, and since he's a second year coach it's a lot to handle learning the HC ropes and improving upon OC skills. I'm sure he'll improve as time goes by like many coordinator to HC promos do but it remains to be seen if he can do both, if he's even a good OC to begin with and if he can develop a QB. He's young, which would potentially mesh well with a new young QB, and is a positive influence on people at least.
Post #: 3412
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:23:54 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

With Kirk being such a planning type and memorizer, I'm amazed they don't employ a play call wrist band that many QBs have. It's loaded with plays for various down and distances and each play can be called with any number of variants or looks. That would be a visual aid to narrow down the list of viable plays KFC has to think about and maybe it would facilitate a better dialog with KOC rather than Kirk having to cover his earholes and listen to the 20 sentence play call coming in from the sideline after w/e process KOC uses to choose a play.


Ah, but KFC is not a visual learner. He vocalizes plays to learn. This has been covered recently, lol.

I think his world as we know it would cease to exist, aka George Costanza.

But have thought the same thing many times.
Post #: 3413
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:24:03 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role
Post #: 3414
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:26:02 PM   
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

First, Tolstoy barks out his latest version of War and Peace that often takes 10 seconds.
Then KFC has to re-vomit it and they have to get to the LOS.
Then they need at least a ten second pad for KFC to go through his initial gyrations, have a guard look back and reset (sometimes twice!), then KFC to finish with the same dual set of fake hand gestures.
Then the C seems to be on his own passive-aggressive schedule thinking I'll hike the ball when I damn please.



LOL, that's the other benefit of a wrist band, they can tell him to run play #28 with w/e variant the current personnel dictates, rather than describe each players duty in a monologue worthy of a self-help seminar. The other pre-snap stuff is just as infuriating, like watching Sergio Garcia twitch for 5min before hitting the ball.
Post #: 3415
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:26:45 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?
Post #: 3416
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:27:20 PM   
Nate

 

Posts: 2295
Joined: 9/10/2009
From: A Galaxy Far Far Away...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

With Kirk being such a planning type and memorizer, I'm amazed they don't employ a play call wrist band that many QBs have. It's loaded with plays for various down and distances and each play can be called with any number of variants or looks. That would be a visual aid to narrow down the list of viable plays KFC has to think about and maybe it would facilitate a better dialog with KOC rather than Kirk having to cover his earholes and listen to the 20 sentence play call coming in from the sideline after w/e process KOC uses to choose a play.


Ah, but KFC is not a visual learner. He vocalizes plays to learn. This has been covered recently, lol.

I think his world as we know it would cease to exist, aka George Costanza.

But have thought the same thing many times.


ah, true, I guess I remember his audio learner style being mentioned. Dang, I guess that explains the pre-snap confusion reading the defense and telling the OL where to block....
Post #: 3417
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:28:07 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Check out the blocking of the C & RG

https://x.com/eric_j_thompson/status/1714377811345936760?s=20
Post #: 3418
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:32:19 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?

Three active QBs that have won a SB, why not now? Seems like as good as time as any to have a few more wins
Post #: 3419
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:33:12 PM  1 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

First, Tolstoy barks out his latest version of War and Peace that often takes 10 seconds.
Then KFC has to re-vomit it and they have to get to the LOS.
Then they need at least a ten second pad for KFC to go through his initial gyrations, have a guard look back and reset (sometimes twice!), then KFC to finish with the same dual set of fake hand gestures.
Then the C seems to be on his own passive-aggressive schedule thinking I'll hike the ball when I damn please.



LOL, that's the other benefit of a wrist band, they can tell him to run play #28 with w/e variant the current personnel dictates, rather than describe each players duty in a monologue worthy of a self-help seminar. The other pre-snap stuff is just as infuriating, like watching Sergio Garcia twitch for 5min before hitting the ball.


I think KOC has about a 100 plays on his double-sided laminated sheet. Now, even though he only calls out 20 of them it would still require multiple players to know 100 things versus something simple for the WR like "S X-ray double burn slow ouch" which means "stand at the LOS for a zero yard pass and be prepared to get the snot knocked out of you".
Post #: 3420
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:34:02 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?

Three active QBs that have won a SB, why not now? Seems like as good as time as any to have a few more wins


Tell that to the team.
Post #: 3421
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:34:20 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?


Some QBs don't peak until they're pushing 40...
Post #: 3422
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:35:46 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?

Three active QBs that have won a SB, why not now? Seems like as good as time as any to have a few more wins


How many active QBs have more than 1 Playoff win the past dozen years?
Post #: 3423
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:37:41 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nate

At least on the offensive side, I, like many here, think KOC should give up the OC duties at a minimum. The offense stalls way to much, has too many rushed plays or TOs attributed to the play clock running down, which all points to lack of planning/preparation. We could argue that it's new personnel and still a relatively new offense but they need to be much crisper in execution and being able to handle adversity or adjustments. Watching some of the top teams, even in losing they were much crisper in getting to the line, making shifts/audibles and had more situational awareness (knowing when to spike the ball, getting to the line quickly to try to draw the defense offsides on 4th and short, getting to the line quickly if there's a challengeable play to force the other team to quickly decide whether to gamble on a challenge, hot routes on obvious blitzes, attacking a new player that's in for someone just injured, etc). There's just so much rote roboticism in the offense, some is due to KFC's style, but I don't see KOC being more efficient or innovative, or even as aware of the situation as a former QB should be!


In fairness to Kevin O'Connell, I'd like to see him have a shot with a different QB before casting a significant portion of the blame on him.

Or maybe a couple games where turnovers and dropped passes didn't play a role


Hasn't mattered for 12 years including when KFC had Diggs and Thielen who caught any dang ball within 10 feet, why now?

Three active QBs that have won a SB, why not now? Seems like as good as time as any to have a few more wins


Tell that to the team.

Ok. I'll get on it.
Post #: 3424
RE: General Vikes Talk - 10/17/2023 4:38:13 PM  1 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28651
Status: offline
Not to mention Jesus Boy already has 4 picks and 3 fumbles.
Post #: 3425
Page:   <<   < prev  135 136 [137] 138 139   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  135 136 [137] 138 139   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode