Dave E
Posts: 25479
Joined: 8/1/2007
From: Minneapolis
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Pete M. quote:
ORIGINAL: Dave E What part of the search -- of which we have little detail beyond rumors -- don't you like? I think he's done a pretty NoGood job of managing the PR and the search in general. The national perception that "Minnesota is swinging and missing on everybody" is inarguably bad for the program. And although NoGood wasn't the source of those rumors, he created the fertile ground for them given the quick trigger on Tubby. Why not hold your powder dry for a couple of days on Tubby, do some behind-the-scenes checking on Shaka/Hoiberg, and then go public? Then, if Shaka and Hoiberg already have extensions, the public expectation starts at a manageable level. I admit to be picking nits to some extent, at least if and until we get more substantial background information. But it appears that NoGood (a) had an inflated sense of the type of candidate he realistically could entice; and (b) the Minnesota program has taken a PR hit -- both nationally and locally -- from the search to this point. I'd agree those are nits. I'm not sure at all that (a) is correct. You don't go calling the Izzos and Coach Ks of the world, obviously, but any responsible AD would reach out the Smarts/Stevens/Hoibergs to take their temp -- which appears to be exactly what Teague did. Not sure (b) is correct on a national level, either. Certainly on a local level, but that appears to be because local fans and media have wildly unrealistic expectations of what a coaching search would look like. Plus, I don't think you can reach a conclusion on (b) until a coach is hired. If the choice is perceived to be a sound hire, then whatever PR "hits" that occurred over the past week disappear.
|