marty
Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
|
I think Jackson is a better WR than any Vick had in Atnalta, and McCoy is a better back than Dunn, he's stronger. Had the Vikes signed Vick last year, they probably wouldn't have had the season they had last year, but they might have had a monster season THIS year. I was all for getting Vick because I thought he was the best out there. He can be awfully hard to gameplan for if you're a defensive co-ordinator. Vick can also get hurt while he does all that running, but players are usually more likely to get hurt when they're are just standing there and others are coming at them full speed (especially if those others are big DL). When running, Vick usually passes the big guys and players aren't usually getting straight on hard hits on him, usually it's from the side. But lower leg injuries could be a concern. I think Vick can take a team all they way, but he may ALWAYS be a guy that comes up short because the tougher defenses in the playoffs can take away enough things to where his weakness on the intermediate passes gets exposed. He is GREAT at elusiveness, short passes and deep passes, but doesn't read the intermediate well enough, or quick enough. Also going against Vick is the fact that refs probably don't like him, and his teams' offense is likely to be the victim of calls against, and more contact (without flags) will probably be allowed with the opposing teams' defense. I think an Andy Ried team is also likely to find a way to come up short in the playoffs, or SB.
< Message edited by marty -- 9/13/2010 8:30:25 PM >
|