Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: College Football (Future Vikings!)

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) Page: <<   < prev  153 154 155 156 [157]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/4/2024 1:38:45 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22940
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

The committee just couldn't get out of their own way and put Alabama in the CFP. Everyone saw it coming after last night but what an absolute sham.

Every Florida State player who is going pro after this year won't play in their Bowl game. Why would they?

What a joke to keep them out of it.


I'd love to see Georgia and Fl. State players not sit out then watch Georgia kill them.

In the era of Name Image and Likeness (NIL), bowl games have become unwatchable. The kids at high-profile schools have already had a taste of big money, and they aren't going to jeopardize their future on a money grab for the school.

Shedeur Sanders's NIL value currently sits at $4.8-million.
Arch Manning doesn't even start at Texas and his is worth $2.8-million.

I say adopt a 3 tier system.

1. Power 5 conferences

2. Every other FBS team. Have a 16-24 team playoff like the FCS has.

3. FCS


So Oklahoma and Texas are joining the SEC? That's crazy.

Two tiers:
1. SEC
2. Others

The top conference in college football this season was the Pac 12. The top four programs are all going to the Big Ten.

SEC still better.

Washington and Oregon obviously very good. But Alabama, Georgia, Miss. State could beat them at a neutral site.

The SEC was way down this season. It's still a great conference, but the star-power wasn't there in 2023.

Outside of Jayden Daniels, the quarterbacks were awful. The Pac 12 could have three quarterbacks drafted in the top-10 of the draft.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 1/4/2024 1:43:13 PM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 3901
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/4/2024 1:47:13 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27205
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

The committee just couldn't get out of their own way and put Alabama in the CFP. Everyone saw it coming after last night but what an absolute sham.

Every Florida State player who is going pro after this year won't play in their Bowl game. Why would they?

What a joke to keep them out of it.


I'd love to see Georgia and Fl. State players not sit out then watch Georgia kill them.

In the era of Name Image and Likeness (NIL), bowl games have become unwatchable. The kids at high-profile schools have already had a taste of big money, and they aren't going to jeopardize their future on a money grab for the school.

Shedeur Sanders's NIL value currently sits at $4.8-million.
Arch Manning doesn't even start at Texas and his is worth $2.8-million.

I say adopt a 3 tier system.

1. Power 5 conferences

2. Every other FBS team. Have a 16-24 team playoff like the FCS has.

3. FCS


So Oklahoma and Texas are joining the SEC? That's crazy.

Two tiers:
1. SEC
2. Others

The top conference in college football this season was the Pac 12. The top four programs are all going to the Big Ten.

SEC still better.

Washington and Oregon obviously very good. But Alabama, Georgia, Miss. State could beat them at a neutral site.

The SEC was way down this season. It's still a great conference, but the star-power wasn't there in 2023.

Outside of Jayden Daniels, the quarterbacks were awful. The Pac 12 could have three quarterbacks drafted in the top-10 of the draft.


How about in NFL talent though.....will the SEC lead once again?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3902
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/4/2024 1:56:05 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12132
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

The committee just couldn't get out of their own way and put Alabama in the CFP. Everyone saw it coming after last night but what an absolute sham.

Every Florida State player who is going pro after this year won't play in their Bowl game. Why would they?

What a joke to keep them out of it.


I'd love to see Georgia and Fl. State players not sit out then watch Georgia kill them.

In the era of Name Image and Likeness (NIL), bowl games have become unwatchable. The kids at high-profile schools have already had a taste of big money, and they aren't going to jeopardize their future on a money grab for the school.

Shedeur Sanders's NIL value currently sits at $4.8-million.
Arch Manning doesn't even start at Texas and his is worth $2.8-million.

I say adopt a 3 tier system.

1. Power 5 conferences

2. Every other FBS team. Have a 16-24 team playoff like the FCS has.

3. FCS


So Oklahoma and Texas are joining the SEC? That's crazy.

Two tiers:
1. SEC
2. Others

The top conference in college football this season was the Pac 12. The top four programs are all going to the Big Ten.

SEC still better.

Washington and Oregon obviously very good. But Alabama, Georgia, Miss. State could beat them at a neutral site.

The SEC was way down this season. It's still a great conference, but the star-power wasn't there in 2023.

Outside of Jayden Daniels, the quarterbacks were awful. The Pac 12 could have three quarterbacks drafted in the top-10 of the draft.

Pac12 definitely has the best QBs. Most defenses were below average.

It's nice to see a Championship game without the SEC in it. Next year will be better with the expanded playoffs.
Post #: 3903
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/4/2024 5:06:17 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22940
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

The committee just couldn't get out of their own way and put Alabama in the CFP. Everyone saw it coming after last night but what an absolute sham.

Every Florida State player who is going pro after this year won't play in their Bowl game. Why would they?

What a joke to keep them out of it.


I'd love to see Georgia and Fl. State players not sit out then watch Georgia kill them.

In the era of Name Image and Likeness (NIL), bowl games have become unwatchable. The kids at high-profile schools have already had a taste of big money, and they aren't going to jeopardize their future on a money grab for the school.

Shedeur Sanders's NIL value currently sits at $4.8-million.
Arch Manning doesn't even start at Texas and his is worth $2.8-million.

I say adopt a 3 tier system.

1. Power 5 conferences

2. Every other FBS team. Have a 16-24 team playoff like the FCS has.

3. FCS


So Oklahoma and Texas are joining the SEC? That's crazy.

Two tiers:
1. SEC
2. Others

The top conference in college football this season was the Pac 12. The top four programs are all going to the Big Ten.

SEC still better.

Washington and Oregon obviously very good. But Alabama, Georgia, Miss. State could beat them at a neutral site.

The SEC was way down this season. It's still a great conference, but the star-power wasn't there in 2023.

Outside of Jayden Daniels, the quarterbacks were awful. The Pac 12 could have three quarterbacks drafted in the top-10 of the draft.

Pac12 definitely has the best QBs. Most defenses were below average.

It's nice to see a Championship game without the SEC in it. Next year will be better with the expanded playoffs.

It's a chicken or an egg thing. A lot of the defenses in the Pac 12 look bad because the quarterbacks are great.

Many people are unaware, but the Pac 12 was very competitive with the SEC during the BCS era. If you only listened to the hype coming from ESPN or lazy journalists, you would have thought the SEC trounced the Pac 12 in head-to-head competition. However, over the 10 years of the BCS the SEC held a 1-or-2 game advantage over the Pac 12 in head-to-head competition. It was very close. The hype machine created by the SEC was off the charts. Nobody shouted louder and created more first round draft picks. But when the two conferences played, it was very close.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 3904
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/10/2024 5:49:14 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77785
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: online
Nick Saban is retiring, sources tell ESPN. He won six national titles at Alabama.

Stat of the day: Under Nick Saban, Alabama had more players drafted in the first-round (44) than it had losses (29).
Post #: 3905
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 1/10/2024 10:12:27 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
And 0-1 against Iowa ;)
Post #: 3906
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 2/7/2024 2:05:27 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12132
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
Is the general thought among recruits that Deion will be jumping to the NFL?

According to CBS Sportsline, his Colorado recruiting class ranks #118.
Post #: 3907
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/6/2024 12:11:54 AM   
DavidAOlson

 

Posts: 18826
Joined: 8/2/2007
Status: offline
A+ trolling at Vanderbilt.

quote:

Vandy played this quote from Nick Saban after the upset over Alabama:

“The only place that’s not hard to play in the SEC is Vanderbilt.”


https://x.com/billyderrick10/status/1842715689830039851 (clip of end of game, with Saban on the big screen)

_____________________________

I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it. --- Alice
Post #: 3908
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 10:39:57 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39146
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

_____________________________

If a cow doesn't provide milk, is that a milk dud or and udder failure?
Post #: 3909
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 10:46:57 AM   
thebigo


Posts: 28293
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

And replay the last part of the game?
Post #: 3910
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 2:01:21 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39146
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

And replay the last part of the game?


If they do that, the NCAA should just stop playing actual Football games and just have Ohio State and Alabama play for the national title every stinking January.

They should fix the rule, but they should table any discussion about it until after the season. They Ducks used the rule to their advantage. The Rule is the rule at this time. They shouldn't change it until after the season, they shouldn't replay anything as no rule was actually broken.

If Ohio State were all that great they wouldn't have needed the 6 seconds they lost for a last minute to win it FG. Ducks beat them. They LOST. No rule was broken. They can wallow in misery for all time.

_____________________________

If a cow doesn't provide milk, is that a milk dud or and udder failure?
Post #: 3911
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 2:18:22 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28395
Status: offline
There is nothing wrong with immediately instituting a rule or a change in order to stop an asinine loophole.

What is wrong is to wait.

Edit: They changed it already. Bravo. Great rationale by the way!

In a release Wednesday, the NCAA issued a new rules interpretation on how to handle a penalty for 12 players on the field in the final two minutes of either half. If the defense has 12 players actively participate in the down, the offense can choose, along with the 5-yard penalty, to have the game clock reset to the time that had been displayed at the snap.

"Football is a very dynamic game," Shaw said. "Occasionally there are specific situations where committing a penalty can give a team an advantage. A guiding principle of the NCAA Football Rules Committee is that there should be no benefit when a team commits a penalty."

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/16/2024 2:24:06 PM >
Post #: 3912
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 2:26:56 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28395
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

And replay the last part of the game?


If they do that, the NCAA should just stop playing actual Football games and just have Ohio State and Alabama play for the national title every stinking January.

They should fix the rule, but they should table any discussion about it until after the season. They Ducks used the rule to their advantage. The Rule is the rule at this time. They shouldn't change it until after the season, they shouldn't replay anything as no rule was actually broken.

If Ohio State were all that great they wouldn't have needed the 6 seconds they lost for a last minute to win it FG. Ducks beat them. They LOST. No rule was broken. They can wallow in misery for all time.


Your post reads more about some itch you have with perennial top teams.

Wallow in misery for all time? LMAO. Good thing you don't pay much attention to CFB. Wow.
Post #: 3913
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 2:27:19 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39146
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

There is nothing wrong with immediately instituting a rule or a change in order to stop an asinine loophole.

What is wrong is to wait.

Edit: They changed it already. Bravo. Great rationale by the way!

In a release Wednesday, the NCAA issued a new rules interpretation on how to handle a penalty for 12 players on the field in the final two minutes of either half. If the defense has 12 players actively participate in the down, the offense can choose, along with the 5-yard penalty, to have the game clock reset to the time that had been displayed at the snap.

"Football is a very dynamic game," Shaw said. "Occasionally there are specific situations where committing a penalty can give a team an advantage. A guiding principle of the NCAA Football Rules Committee is that there should be no benefit when a team commits a penalty."


Now, do you think if this happened in a Maryland/Northwestern game that they would have acted this quickly to correct it?

_____________________________

If a cow doesn't provide milk, is that a milk dud or and udder failure?
Post #: 3914
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 2:31:11 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39146
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

And replay the last part of the game?


If they do that, the NCAA should just stop playing actual Football games and just have Ohio State and Alabama play for the national title every stinking January.

They should fix the rule, but they should table any discussion about it until after the season. They Ducks used the rule to their advantage. The Rule is the rule at this time. They shouldn't change it until after the season, they shouldn't replay anything as no rule was actually broken.

If Ohio State were all that great they wouldn't have needed the 6 seconds they lost for a last minute to win it FG. Ducks beat them. They LOST. No rule was broken. They can wallow in misery for all time.


Your post reads more about some itch you have with perennial top teams.

Wallow in misery for all time? LMAO. Good thing you don't pay much attention to CFB. Wow.



I don't have a problem with perennial top teams. I have a problem with preferential treatment that those teams get from the organization they are governed by, giving them advantage to remain perennial top teams. NCAA, MLB, NFL, NBA...etc, they all do it. and it infuriating. It's not about even competition....It's about making a buck.

If what happened was in a game between NDSU and Miami of Ohio...do you think the NCAA would have even noticed much less acted on it?

I seriously don't.

But it was OHIO STATE, one of their chosen few....So they must ACT NOW.

_____________________________

If a cow doesn't provide milk, is that a milk dud or and udder failure?
Post #: 3915
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 4:29:30 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28395
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

There is nothing wrong with immediately instituting a rule or a change in order to stop an asinine loophole.

What is wrong is to wait.

Edit: They changed it already. Bravo. Great rationale by the way!

In a release Wednesday, the NCAA issued a new rules interpretation on how to handle a penalty for 12 players on the field in the final two minutes of either half. If the defense has 12 players actively participate in the down, the offense can choose, along with the 5-yard penalty, to have the game clock reset to the time that had been displayed at the snap.

"Football is a very dynamic game," Shaw said. "Occasionally there are specific situations where committing a penalty can give a team an advantage. A guiding principle of the NCAA Football Rules Committee is that there should be no benefit when a team commits a penalty."


Now, do you think if this happened in a Maryland/Northwestern game that they would have acted this quickly to correct it?


If the coach said he did it on purpose like what happened with the Oregon coach, then yes.

And who cares who the teams were. Ohio State still lost and that won't be reversed. The game is just > < that much better for what happened, unless of course one is ok with a team gaining an advantage by intentionally committing a penalty.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/16/2024 4:35:40 PM >
Post #: 3916
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 4:31:53 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28395
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

OK. So I don't pay much attention to college football but I didn't realize that Oregon Ducks beat Ohio State and a controversial play was involved.


https://www.yahoo.com/sports/ncaa-mulling-in-season-action-after-oregons-controversial-late-game-situational-move-helped-ducks-beat-ohio-state-154542363.html

So after a timeout the defense put 12 men on the field intentionally...and in college football they don't put the time back on the clock...so the Ducks intentionally got a penalty that ate time off the clock and kept THE Ohio state from getting into FG range for the game winning kick...

Two things here. In the NFL they put the time back on the clock so this wouldn't work in the NFL. 2. If this had happened to say Kansas State, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota, or NDSU or any number of NOT OHIO STATE Schools...the NCAA would've have just chalked it up as a quirk in the rules and maybe looked at it in the offseason to correct it. But since THE Ohio State was negatively impacted here....We need to look into it NOW.

And replay the last part of the game?


If they do that, the NCAA should just stop playing actual Football games and just have Ohio State and Alabama play for the national title every stinking January.

They should fix the rule, but they should table any discussion about it until after the season. They Ducks used the rule to their advantage. The Rule is the rule at this time. They shouldn't change it until after the season, they shouldn't replay anything as no rule was actually broken.

If Ohio State were all that great they wouldn't have needed the 6 seconds they lost for a last minute to win it FG. Ducks beat them. They LOST. No rule was broken. They can wallow in misery for all time.


Your post reads more about some itch you have with perennial top teams.

Wallow in misery for all time? LMAO. Good thing you don't pay much attention to CFB. Wow.



I don't have a problem with perennial top teams. I have a problem with preferential treatment that those teams get from the organization they are governed by, giving them advantage to remain perennial top teams. NCAA, MLB, NFL, NBA...etc, they all do it. and it infuriating. It's not about even competition....It's about making a buck.

If what happened was in a game between NDSU and Miami of Ohio...do you think the NCAA would have even noticed much less acted on it?

I seriously don't.

But it was OHIO STATE, one of their chosen few....So they must ACT NOW.


In this case, it's GOOD that it happened to a top team because it shed light on a gap in the rules.
Post #: 3917
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/16/2024 4:43:30 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28395
Status: offline
I have a problem with preferential treatment that those teams get from the organization they are governed by, giving them advantage to remain perennial top teams.

So how did the NCAA give preferential treatment to Ohio State? What was the enduring advantage?

And since Oregon is ALSO a top team, how did the NCAA give THEM preferential treatment?
Post #: 3918
RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) - 10/19/2024 1:13:15 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12132
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

I have a problem with preferential treatment that those teams get from the organization they are governed by, giving them advantage to remain perennial top teams.

So how did the NCAA give preferential treatment to Ohio State? What was the enduring advantage?

And since Oregon is ALSO a top team, how did the NCAA give THEM preferential treatment?

It's early in the process but they probably need a salary cap of some sort.
Post #: 3919
Page:   <<   < prev  153 154 155 156 [157]
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: College Football (Future Vikings!) Page: <<   < prev  153 154 155 156 [157]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode