Trekgeekscott
Posts: 39282
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CPAMAN quote:
ORIGINAL: twinsfan One of the best and most important days of the year. I watched MLB Network's roundtable HOF discussion last night. There was one guy in particular that was very annoying. He didn't think anyone should go in the HOF. Completely clinging to the past. "If he's not as good as Joe Morgan, he's not in." Can't remember the guy's name...he was the only guy at the table that didn't look familiar at all. Bob Costas seemed more old school than I thought he would be. Relies on the eye test for HOFers. Seems to only see the number he wants to see. I was a little surprised and disappointed in his analysis. I'm hoping Maddux, Glavine and Thomas get it. And I'm hoping Raines' percentage goes up, although I'm not too hopeful on that this year with the loaded ballot. Finally, I hope that Jeff Kent and Larry Walker have decent showings. Hopefully nobody that deserves further consideration gets under the 5% (like Kenny Lofton last year). If Maddux doesn't get in on the first try the voting criteria is entirely flawed. Thomas can sit for a season or two. The same for Glavine. But they both belong. Just say no to Craig Biggio. He was a roider. Same for Kent and Walker. They played during the PED era and I believe they were guilty even if they didn't use themselves. If they are HOFers in your eyes they why make them sit? What evidence do you have that Biggio is a roider and Thomas, Glavie and Maddux are not..they all played in the same era with Kent and Walker. and anyone that played in that era was guilty if if they didn't use, then why do you give Maddux a pass? and Glavine and Thomas? Your rant makes no sense.
_____________________________
“There is no hate like Christian love.”
|